tbhawksfan1 wrote:Whole Truth wrote:tbhawksfan1 wrote:Pel's fans are trying so hard to get a good BI deal but it ain't happening
IMO Pelicans are better off keeping BI & trading CJ. Regardless of their respective trade markets.
CJ is the reason Jonas was let go & he will be the reason BI will be seen & traded as a poor fit.
Book mark the thread. The team that trades for BI will get a better player than the one seen in NO's.
He's averaging less than 60 games a season over his last
7 seasons and want to get paid the max. You will not get much value in a BI trade
Fair assessment & opinion, most large contracts come with financial risk known & unknown. As far as I'm concerned. I think all NO's have to really to do is open cap space by trading CJ & extend BI, they will ultimately save on their dead/risky money. Move Murphy in over CJ who's also not a PG but playing a role instead of BI. Turn to point Zion as they have been wanting to do for a while now, without the offensive overlap of BI & CJ taking 30 APG, with more defensive comp having Murphy's added length or maybe even Daniels versatility, if there's progression in his offensive game.
Maybe for NO's, Daniels (20), takes an offensive leap over the summer. He'd immediately be a better defensive option than Murray with more versatility 1-4 on rookie scale & all of a sudden Murray's 25-30m, doesn't look as appealing with that option. If Daniels can provide adequate spacing. He & Herb would be less than 20m combined starting, which would offset any financial risk of adding 15m of CJ's 30m to BI's extension.
Agree or disagree, NO's fans see BI as the better more versatile player than Murray but have Murray's value in fit & contract. With CJ not blocking Daniels with his 30m, an offensive leap & CJ dumped for cap space addresses BI's extension/financial risk
CJ + Murray = 60-65m
BI extended 50m, Herb 12m, Daniels 6m = 65-70m