cdubbz wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:^Stephen A doesn't know sh*t about women's hoops. That's why Monica McNutt isn't appearing on First Take anymore because she exposed him for talking out of his ass.
This trash thread is 15 pages of people arguing for Clark to be named to a roster, where she would be sitting bench throughout the entire tournament because she isn't better than any of the guards on the roster and that includes a 42 year old Diana Taurasi.
Yall can stay mad about it, but those are facts. If you want to argue that Clark is better than Ionescu, Plum, Loyd, Gray, Taurasi, and Young right now, you might as well just admit that you don't watch women's hoops, because she isn't and that's why she isn't on the team.
A lot of the arguments i've seen from SAS and other NBA analysts or NBA players isn't for Clark to be on the team because she's BETTER than anyone on the roster, but because she's more MARKETABLE to grow the game. It's frustrating for myself to see TeamUSA fumble this.
- More eyeballs watching. More eyeballs = exposing A'Ja Wilson, Stewie, & Sabrina to those who are newer.
- Sellout Clark USA jerseys.
Yes I get that Team USA has been together and have continuity, but they've won Gold fairly easily in how many straight Olympics now? They will win the Gold with or without Clark.
I also don't think Clark would need to sit on the bench the entire tournament - USA blows out some teams by 20+ points. Showcase Clark here and there. She doesn't need to play big minutes.
I get that. However:
Team USA Basketball's top brass is not in the marketing Caitlin Clark business, their job is to form the best program possible over a multiple year period to win gold. And looking at the roster, they did what they needed to do.
Also, I dunno how anyone could have watched CC get the brakes beaten off her by Dijonai Carrington last night and still are here demanding that CC be gifted a roster spot. She has a LONG way to go before this should even be a discussion