New York Trading Up

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

JayTWill
Starter
Posts: 2,358
And1: 1,569
Joined: May 14, 2011

New York Trading Up 

Post#1 » by JayTWill » Thu Jun 13, 2024 12:20 pm

If the Knicks attempted to trade up in this year's draft for whatever reason how high could they possibly move? They have picks 24,25, and 38.

Are there any teams that may be looking to move back in the draft? What pick would you be willing to offer for any combination of those 3 picks?
Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,767
And1: 8,071
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#2 » by Mamba4Goat » Thu Jun 13, 2024 12:43 pm

If the Lakers aren’t really sold on anyone at 17, moving back to the Knicks picks could make sense. Add extra youth and it wouldn’t be as much of a reach to grab more of the high floor guys like Kolek, Dunn, Holmes, etc.that could potentially contribute right away.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#3 » by Colbinii » Thu Jun 13, 2024 1:30 pm

It depends who is on the board.
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,930
And1: 5,998
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#4 » by R-DAWG » Thu Jun 13, 2024 4:58 pm

Colbinii wrote:It depends who is on the board.


And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#5 » by Colbinii » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:20 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
Colbinii wrote:It depends who is on the board.


And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.


What?

You aren't moving up more than 1 spot with just #38.

#24 + #25 gets to like #16-19
User avatar
tacos
Senior
Posts: 652
And1: 495
Joined: Dec 27, 2015

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#6 » by tacos » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:27 pm

Colbinii wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
Colbinii wrote:It depends who is on the board.


And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.


What?

You aren't moving up more than 1 spot with just #38.

#24 + #25 gets to like #16-19


Exactly... the difference in value between a mid-teen prospect and a mid-20s prospect is a lot more than the almost nothing that end of the 30s draft pick is worth
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,930
And1: 5,998
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#7 » by R-DAWG » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:34 pm

tacos wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.


What?

You aren't moving up more than 1 spot with just #38.

#24 + #25 gets to like #16-19


Exactly... the difference in value between a mid-teen prospect and a mid-20s prospect is a lot more than the almost nothing that end of the 30s draft pick is worth


IDK - all I hear is how bad this draft is.
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,879
And1: 1,908
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#8 » by orlando_joe » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:41 pm

if da silva gone as magic fan would not mind trade back for holmes and furphy ? and would give pick 47 back to ny..so 24,25 for 18 and 47...would take ny having player on the board
magic just send them to g league 2 swings for 1 hope 1 will stick on the cheap future backups for paolo and franz
supertruck97
Veteran
Posts: 2,564
And1: 237
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#9 » by supertruck97 » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:41 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
tacos wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
What?

You aren't moving up more than 1 spot with just #38.

#24 + #25 gets to like #16-19


Exactly... the difference in value between a mid-teen prospect and a mid-20s prospect is a lot more than the almost nothing that end of the 30s draft pick is worth


IDK - all I hear is how bad this draft is.


It's a bad draft because the top few players would likely be 5-10 picks in a better draft. But the guys between 12-30 are all roughly the same as you'd find in any other draft....
Xman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,642
And1: 469
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#10 » by Xman » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:49 pm

Draft pick chart show pick value to up around #10. But, that seems too high. POR at #14 would be first attempt - hoping they want more bodies at this point.
Xman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,642
And1: 469
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#11 » by Xman » Thu Jun 13, 2024 5:55 pm

Seems like there are groupings:
In top 5 - Risacher, Sarr
In top 8 - Clingan, Sheppard
In top 10 - Castle, Dillingham, Buzelis
Rounds out the top12: Saluan, Topic, Knecht, Holland, CWilliams
Maybe pops up: JWalter, DCarter, McCain or one of the bigs (Edey, Ware, Filipowski, Missi all in next tier).
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#12 » by ejftw » Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:05 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
Colbinii wrote:It depends who is on the board.


And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.


I mean, if Clips can turn 46 and a FSRP into the 20s for, say, Isaiah Collier, that'd be exciting too.

It just...isn't going to happen.

24/25/38 for 17/57/FSRP (or two) is more likely.
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,930
And1: 5,998
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#13 » by R-DAWG » Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:44 pm

ejftw wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
Colbinii wrote:It depends who is on the board.


And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.


I mean, if Clips can turn 46 and a FSRP into the 20s for, say, Isaiah Collier, that'd be exciting too.

It just...isn't going to happen.

24/25/38 for 17/57/FSRP (or two) is more likely.


1) I have seen mocks showing Walter falling to the late teens
2) 24 + 39 is much more valuable than 46 + future 2nd rd pick
3) NY has a protected WAS 1st that will likely convey as a high 2nd that should be included in these discussions as well.
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,661
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#14 » by ejftw » Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:52 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
ejftw wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
And the cost to move up as well.

If I can move up to the mid teens to grab Ja'Kobe Walter at the cost of Pick #39 and retain pick #25 in the process, that's exciting.


I mean, if Clips can turn 46 and a FSRP into the 20s for, say, Isaiah Collier, that'd be exciting too.

It just...isn't going to happen.

24/25/38 for 17/57/FSRP (or two) is more likely.


1) I have seen mocks showing Walter falling to the late teens
2) 24 + 39 is much more valuable than 46 + future 2nd rd pick
3) NY has a protected WAS 1st that will likely convey as a high 2nd that should be included in these discussions as well.


1) I said nothing in relation to the stock of JaKobe. In fact, last board I did, I think I had him around 23.
2) Sure, and a mid teens pick is more valuable than a mid 20s pick, if not late as I just said 20s with no specification.
3) A second in 2027 doesn't hold much value, at least not nearly enough to turn 24, along with 39, into a mid teens pick. Value of the Wiz pick would be if they somehow ended up in the early teens next year, but that's not a worthy gamble for any team trading for it imo..
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#15 » by Colbinii » Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:23 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
tacos wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
What?

You aren't moving up more than 1 spot with just #38.

#24 + #25 gets to like #16-19


Exactly... the difference in value between a mid-teen prospect and a mid-20s prospect is a lot more than the almost nothing that end of the 30s draft pick is worth


IDK - all I hear is how bad this draft is.


Okay, why does that matter here though?

Do you think #1 and #60 have the same value?
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#16 » by Colbinii » Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:24 pm

supertruck97 wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
tacos wrote:
Exactly... the difference in value between a mid-teen prospect and a mid-20s prospect is a lot more than the almost nothing that end of the 30s draft pick is worth


IDK - all I hear is how bad this draft is.


It's a bad draft because the top few players would likely be 5-10 picks in a better draft. But the guys between 12-30 are all roughly the same as you'd find in any other draft....


Ding ding ding
theBigLip
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 16,858
And1: 3,451
Joined: May 22, 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
       

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#17 » by theBigLip » Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:25 pm

Detroit will give you #5 for #24,#25 and the future first that may never convey.

Details of that pick:
2025 first round draft pick to New York
Detroit's 1st round pick to New York protected for selections 1-13 in 2025, 1-11 in 2026 and 1-9 in 2027; if Detroit has not conveyed a 1st round pick to New York by 2027, then Detroit will instead convey its 2027 2nd round pick to New York (via Houston to Oklahoma City) [Detroit-Houston, 11/24/2020; Houston-Oklahoma City, 7/30/2021; New York-Oklahoma City, 6/23/2022]
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,070
And1: 17,590
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#18 » by babyjax13 » Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:36 pm

theBigLip wrote:Detroit will give you #5 for #24,#25 and the future first that may never convey.

Details of that pick:
2025 first round draft pick to New York
Detroit's 1st round pick to New York protected for selections 1-13 in 2025, 1-11 in 2026 and 1-9 in 2027; if Detroit has not conveyed a 1st round pick to New York by 2027, then Detroit will instead convey its 2027 2nd round pick to New York (via Houston to Oklahoma City) [Detroit-Houston, 11/24/2020; Houston-Oklahoma City, 7/30/2021; New York-Oklahoma City, 6/23/2022]

You are all over the place on the value of this pick :lol: Detroit could do a lot better than this. Even something like 5 for 12 + a future first from OKC would be better.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,930
And1: 5,998
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#19 » by R-DAWG » Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:51 pm

ejftw wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
ejftw wrote:
I mean, if Clips can turn 46 and a FSRP into the 20s for, say, Isaiah Collier, that'd be exciting too.

It just...isn't going to happen.

24/25/38 for 17/57/FSRP (or two) is more likely.


1) I have seen mocks showing Walter falling to the late teens
2) 24 + 39 is much more valuable than 46 + future 2nd rd pick
3) NY has a protected WAS 1st that will likely convey as a high 2nd that should be included in these discussions as well.


1) I said nothing in relation to the stock of JaKobe. In fact, last board I did, I think I had him around 23.
2) Sure, and a mid teens pick is more valuable than a mid 20s pick, if not late as I just said 20s with no specification.
3) A second in 2027 doesn't hold much value, at least not nearly enough to turn 24, along with 39, into a mid teens pick. Value of the Wiz pick would be if they somehow ended up in the early teens next year, but that's not a worthy gamble for any team trading for it imo..


Number 2 is not necessarily true. The salary slot in the mid to late teens is higher than that of a mid 20's pick. So a team with payroll concerns as it relates to apon's, ect who isn't in love with a player at their slot might prioritize a lower salary slot

Remember, in 2021, the Knicks traded the 19th pick in the draft for a heavily protected future 1st (that will convey as 2 2nds) because they didn't love what was available at that slot and needed the use of the salary cap space elsewhere.
JayTWill
Starter
Posts: 2,358
And1: 1,569
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: New York Trading Up 

Post#20 » by JayTWill » Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:25 pm

theBigLip wrote:Detroit will give you #5 for #24,#25 and the future first that may never convey.

Details of that pick:
2025 first round draft pick to New York
Detroit's 1st round pick to New York protected for selections 1-13 in 2025, 1-11 in 2026 and 1-9 in 2027; if Detroit has not conveyed a 1st round pick to New York by 2027, then Detroit will instead convey its 2027 2nd round pick to New York (via Houston to Oklahoma City) [Detroit-Houston, 11/24/2020; Houston-Oklahoma City, 7/30/2021; New York-Oklahoma City, 6/23/2022]


I have actually been trying to figure out ways for the Knicks to move up to the #5 pick using the future protected first from Detroit.
The Pistons are basically in the same position the Rockets have been in adding a ton of youth but not developing in the way they were expected to. The Rockets added some veteran talent last off-season along with a new coach to turn things around but in the process they forfeited the #12 pick to OKC this year since it fell outside of the protections.

I feel Detroit should start to add some veteran talent around these young players and hopefully in the process get out of the basement of the league. I could see the protected pick falling in the 10-16 range in the next 3 years unless the Pistons plan to be in the bottom 9 teams all the way through 2027 which may be a terrible idea for how long the team has been bad.

I like the idea of adding some size and defense to the Knicks backcourt. If Castle is there at 5 I would love to move up and gamble on his development on the offensive end with the hope that he could be a positive defender at the 1 and 2 next to Brunson and the Knicks' other small guards until then.

Edit - I also like the idea of the Knick's possibly moving off of Robinson's contract and replacing him with someone cheaper and hopefully healthier like Goga if they believe they can re-sign iHart for the starting center role. I would be willing to add him with some combination of other assets to move up and free up some money and create some financial flexibility this year.

Return to Trades and Transactions


cron