More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread

3toheadmelo · Post #621 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 12:59 am

DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:seeing how successful tatum and brown have been just shows how important wings are in todays nba. get me ingram plzz

rather get maga porter instead if we can

hell no

3toheadmelo · Post #622 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:00 am

indiana has no answer for him too

Read on Twitter

DaGawd · Post #623 » by **DaGawd** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:00 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:seeing how successful tatum and brown have been just shows how important wings are in todays nba. get me ingram plzz

rather get maga porter instead if we can

hell no

hell yeah… way better fit. he can space the hell out the floor for randle and brun

3toheadmelo · Post #624 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:04 am

DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:rather get maga porter instead if we can

hell no

hell yeah… way better fit. he can space the hell out the floor for randle and brun

how is he a better fit? you playing og at the 2? ingram has been playing the 2 most of the time for the past 2 years so at least that works. and porter is a cone on defense.

DaGawd · Post #625 » by **DaGawd** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:09 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:hell no

hell yeah… way better fit. he can space the hell out the floor for randle and brun

how is he a better fit? you playing og at the 2? ingram has been playing the 2 most of the time for the past 2 years so at least that works. and porter is a cone on defense.

where does ingram fit? he’s not really a 2.. and he’s a meh shooter from 3.. i don’t see it

3toheadmelo · Post #626 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:17 am

DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:hell yeah… way better fit. he can space the hell out the floor for randle and brun

how is he a better fit? you playing og at the 2? ingram has been playing the 2 most of the time for the past 2 years so at least that works. and porter is a cone on defense.

where does ingram fit? he’s not really a 2.. and he’s a meh shooter from 3.. i don’t see it

ingram is used to playing the 2. thats what hes been doing on the pelicans. he's a career 36% 3pt shooter from 3 which is fine.

i dont see how forcing og to play the 2 is any better

DaGawd · Post #627 » by **DaGawd** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:20 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:how is he a better fit? you playing og at the 2? ingram has been playing the 2 most of the time for the past 2 years so at least that works. and porter is a cone on defense.

where does ingram fit? he’s not really a 2.. and he’s a meh shooter from 3.. i don’t see it

ingram is used to playing the 2. thats what hes been doing on the pelicans. he's a career 36% 3pt shooter from 3 which is fine.

i dont see how forcing og to play the 2 is any better

no you both then.. **** brandon ingram :lol:

F N 11 · Post #628 » by **F N 11** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:22 am

DaGawd wrote:
F N 11 wrote:What’s the latest scoop? I’m not locked in. Turn me up.

we feel confident in resigning ihart and og. that’s about it

Very good news.

3toheadmelo · Post #629 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:33 am

DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:where does ingram fit? he’s not really a 2.. and he’s a meh shooter from 3.. i don’t see it

ingram is used to playing the 2. thats what hes been doing on the pelicans. he's a career 36% 3pt shooter from 3 which is fine.

i dont see how forcing og to play the 2 is any better

no you both then.. **** brandon ingram

eventually you'll be on the bandwagon 8-)

aggo · Post #630 » by **aggo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:45 am

Don’t be stupid.

Go get kat

All in.

DaGawd · Post #631 » by **DaGawd** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 1:52 am

aggo wrote:Don’t be stupid.

Go get kat

All in.

dear lord

Fat Kat · Post #632 » by **Fat Kat** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 2:35 am

Eewww. What happened in here?

Guano · Post #633 » by **Guano** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:12 am

3toheadmelo wrote:ingram can be our jaylen brown to brunson

you're not slick with this one

Guano · Post #634 » by **Guano** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:13 am

going to be real hard for any team to win a chip with KAT on that deal in this new cba

3toheadmelo · Post #635 » by **3toheadmelo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:23 am

Guano wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:ingram can be our jaylen brown to brunson

you're not slick with this one

Have no idea what you’re taking about!!

NoDopeOnSundays · Post #636 » by **NoDopeOnSundays** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:24 am

Guano wrote:going to be real hard for any team to win a chip with KAT on that deal in this new cba

It's going to be hard for us to win with the centers we have though, if they plan on keeping Randle they cannot continue to put rim runners next to him, it's so stupid at this point. Trade Mitch and actually draft someone that profiles as a stretch 5. The era of the rim runner is completely over, the only way I can any team winning with one of them is if they're under $10 million per year. As much as I like IHart, his lack of a shot is also going to be a hinderance to winning a chip.

aggo · Post #637 » by **aggo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:29 am

Guano wrote:going to be real hard for any team to win a chip with KAT on that deal in this new cba

wait until you see Randle's new deal

8516knicks · Post #638 » by **8516knicks** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:30 am

Capn'O wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:To KD or not KD:

Read on Twitter

Boy might be legit down to play for the 'Bockers

IF YOU HAD GONE THERE SOLO THEY WOULD HAVE BUILT AN AMAZING TEAM AROUND YOU, YOU HUGE DUMMY!!!

KD & Kyrie's song. I WILL FOLLOW HIM (to the ends of the FLAT Earth!) :nod:

Watch on YouTube

HarthorneWingo · Post #639 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:36 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:ingram is used to playing the 2. thats what hes been doing on the pelicans. he's a career 36% 3pt shooter from 3 which is fine.

i dont see how forcing og to play the 2 is any better

no you both then.. **** brandon ingram

eventually you'll be on the bandwagon

Guano · Post #640 » by **Guano** » Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:51 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Guano wrote:going to be real hard for any team to win a chip with KAT on that deal in this new cba

It's going to be hard for us to win with the centers we have though, if they plan on keeping Randle they cannot continue to put rim runners next to him, it's so stupid at this point. Trade Mitch and actually draft someone that profiles as a stretch 5. The era of the rim runner is completely over, the only way I can any team winning with one of them is if they're under $10 million per year. As much as I like IHart, his lack of a shot is also going to be a hinderance to winning a chip.

it would be a lot harder to win with KAT playing C for us than those 2. he is a dummy, can't be counted on in the playoffs, limits roster construction on that deal, and isn't a good defender.

as for our centers, they both are nice yet limited. iHart is the better offensive player and if we're interested in upgrading with a stretch 5 he can go, because mitch is the better defender of the two.