midranger wrote:Bowen was startable mainly because he played between Duncan, Parker, and Ginobili AND became a legit elite level corner shooter. He lead the league in 3 point shooting one year despite being an awful FT shooter.
I think that development is really hard to assume in any player, and by the time it’d potentially develop a few years down the road, this Bucks team would need more dynamic offensive threats (assuming Mids and Dame don’t find some font of youth).
I’m not against Dunn, but I think you need to view him as a one way guy.
Well said. I'm in the same position.
I'll throw out Trevor Ariza as an example. 5 times he was top 20 in All Defense voting. But wasn't until his 5th season when he was able to shoot in the 30s even & a team felt they could justify playing him even (barely) half the game. By that point he was on his 3rd club. And it wasn't until his 9th season, 6th team, until he was unequivocally a good enough 3 pt shooter to be an asset.
Kris Dunn was 11th in All Defense voting, but was traded already after his first season, & washed out of the league in a few yrs due to his bad offense. He's had a rejuvenation...to a guy we're talking about maybe adding w/ the TPMLE (if we have it).
Ryan Dunn could be even better than his defensive brother, and he may develop shooting/scoring, but what use will it be to us? If we have to sell players low because they haven't developed yet, we don't benefit. That's not factored in enough. Projects usually benefit someone else. That could be true of Dunn, or he's a useful but very flawed role guy early. Is that a good equation? There are plenty of worse options, but plenty of better ones too, imo.




















