New York trade: Randle
New York receive: Kuzma
Chicago trade: Lavine, 11
Chicago receive: Randle, Holmes
Washington trade: Kuzma, Holmes
Washington receive: Lavine, 11
Why for Chicago: fill PF hole and improve chance of making playoffs
Why for New York: avoid having to shell out for Randle's extension and get a cost controlled, albeit less good PF
Why for Washington: try to rebuild Lavine's value while nabbing a lotto pick for Kuzma. Lavine's contract comes off the books same time as Poole
New York - Chicago - Washington
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
New York - Chicago - Washington
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,978
- And1: 13,902
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,327
- And1: 6,693
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
No way for the Wizards. No one in their right mind is trading for Lavine given his terrible contract and recent foot surgery. The #11 in this draft is nowhere close to being suitable compensation.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,686
- And1: 9,242
- Joined: Jul 23, 2011
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
-
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
God no from Chicago, absolutely no.
No interest in Randle and giving up 11.
No interest in Randle and giving up 11.
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,011
- And1: 22,428
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
Given Lavine's inability to stay healthy, I'd say that Kuzma is at least as valuable, if not more valuable than Lavine as a basketball player. For argument's sake, let's assume they are roughly equal in terms of on-the-court production.
So effectively, this trade is using the #11 pick to incentivize Washington taking on the salary differential between Lavine and Kuzma. That salary differential is a whopping $25M a year for the next 3 years. The Wizards are being asked to pay $75 MILLION DOLLARS for the #11 pick in a weak draft.
Edit: I guess dumping Holmes has some value, so it's actually like paying $63M dollars for the #11 pick. Which is still pretty insane.
So effectively, this trade is using the #11 pick to incentivize Washington taking on the salary differential between Lavine and Kuzma. That salary differential is a whopping $25M a year for the next 3 years. The Wizards are being asked to pay $75 MILLION DOLLARS for the #11 pick in a weak draft.
Edit: I guess dumping Holmes has some value, so it's actually like paying $63M dollars for the #11 pick. Which is still pretty insane.
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,918
- And1: 2,185
- Joined: Mar 19, 2016
-
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
Godaddycurse wrote:New York trade: Randle
New York receive: Kuzma
Chicago trade: Lavine, 11
Chicago receive: Randle, Holmes
Washington trade: Kuzma, Holmes
Washington receive: Lavine, 11
Why for Chicago: fill PF hole and improve chance of making playoffs
Why for New York: avoid having to shell out for Randle's extension and get a cost controlled, albeit less good PF
Why for Washington: try to rebuild Lavine's value while nabbing a lotto pick for Kuzma. Lavine's contract comes off the books same time as Poole
Randle and Kuzma are not equally valuable.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential
and still be treated as if you were reasonable.

Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,060
- And1: 8,603
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
Knickfan1982 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:New York trade: Randle
New York receive: Kuzma
Chicago trade: Lavine, 11
Chicago receive: Randle, Holmes
Washington trade: Kuzma, Holmes
Washington receive: Lavine, 11
Why for Chicago: fill PF hole and improve chance of making playoffs
Why for New York: avoid having to shell out for Randle's extension and get a cost controlled, albeit less good PF
Why for Washington: try to rebuild Lavine's value while nabbing a lotto pick for Kuzma. Lavine's contract comes off the books same time as Poole
Randle and Kuzma are not equally valuable.
I agree. Kuzma does have a better contract situation, but Randle has much more impact on the court.
If OG has NYK over a barrel and they want mostly salary relief for Randle, there are better deals -- if there were any assurance he'd extend with DET I'd love to have him
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,415
- And1: 98,295
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
On this one, I'm still down for Chicago. Don't like this one for the Knicks as much, but maybe? Agree with those saying this is just too much money to take on for the Wizards. I just don't think LaVine represents a meaningful upgrade over Kuzma. And he and Poole together is just a terrible combination. I don't mind another tanking year, but I'd not want to set up 3 more.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,930
- And1: 5,998
- Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
Texas Chuck wrote:On this one, I'm still down for Chicago. Don't like this one for the Knicks as much, but maybe? Agree with those saying this is just too much money to take on for the Wizards. I just don't think LaVine represents a meaningful upgrade over Kuzma. And he and Poole together is just a terrible combination. I don't mind another tanking year, but I'd not want to set up 3 more.
It's a money saving move for the Knicks. Only makes sense if there is a different non Randle trade for a #2 scoring option (ie Bogdonvovic plus Robinson as salary plus picks for star player).
At that point, Kuzma on his contract has value for NY.
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,083
- And1: 14,454
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: New York - Chicago - Washington
I wouldn't mind bringing Kuzma in as an expensive back up so that we were covered if Julius got hurt before the playoffs again...but we can't downgrade our starting lineup like that.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Return to Trades and Transactions