ImageImageImageImageImage

More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread

Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks

nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1001 » by nykballa2k4 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 4:16 pm

Wildcat wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:You are being foolishly confident here.
You may disagree with my belief, but to be so absolute about it is ignorant.

Why could there be buyers remorse?
Well we traded for a player who proved to be a flawless fit in our system, however his availability was poor (as has been the case throughout his career). Perhaps it was expected he would miss a fraction of the games he did miss. Our doctors may be trash, but I imagine they expected him back sooner than he did come back. he appears to struggle playing through pain.

Where am I getting this "top gun" thing from?
Back in his Toronto days, OG trade rumrs kicked up about 1.5 years ago because he wanted a bigger role on the team. The team already had Siakam and FVV (similar to how we have Randle/Brunson). He may very well look in the mirror and see Jaylen Brown based on how that article came off.
The quote "unhappy with his role" was said as he was averaging 17ppg.
He also already declined an extension 4/117 which obviously had injury risk baked into it (offered well in advance of the end of the contract). So 30M is that starting point of negotiations, likely much higher with the cap rising.

If the current offer is 35M, but there are games played factored in (that implies he is choosing to not play), then he really might not be getting a much better deal than he declined.

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/rankings/player/_/year/2024/sort/cap_base
looking at this salaries list perhaps he thought with is strong w/l that he would be in that 40M camp (putting him in that top 20 category).

TLDR version: He was unhappy with a role as #3 scoring option avg 17ppg, he balked at 30M, we traded for him with expectations and it appears that our management thinks he was sitting when he did not need to thus falling short on those expectations.


And I think you're being annoyingly pessimistic.


You got me there :lol:


This "rumor" of him wanting to be top gun is an exaggeration of what he "allegedly" said. Which -- by the way -- he never said. He never said he was unhappy. What started all this, was Nurse, and I quote, saying, "He wants to be more a part of the offense. So I certainly can help him with that. I can design plays, I can get him in situations, etc., but it's kind of a working relationship that he's got to go take some of that, right." A literal who writer took that quote and exaggerated it, then other outlets regurgitated the literal who's comment. Put distance from this ridiculous notion. It's not true. You're not going to convince me that Fischer has some Raptor insider info when this originated from Nurse.

I am not prepared to be definitive either way. There were multiple articles that had gone out to the effect that OG wanted a bigger role. it is an assumption from you that it was a mis-characterized Nick Nurse comment, just like it is an assumption from me that it is from actual journalism.

To my understanding, a contract extension was never offered by the Raptors, but he always had plans to hit free agency no matter what because his extension would be only 4 years @ 117 million, which is obviously a bargain. Betting on myself -- like all NBA players do -- isn't some unique phenomenon.

He declined the extension as an oft-injured but developing player. There is a lot of risk to that. A often hurt player will not often thumb their nose at near 30M/year guaranteed. He did bet on himself, and he is going to make sure that effort pays off, IMO, literally.

Philly would be better off with Paul George at a similar price, but the advantage of signing OG is that it weakens us.
There are finite teams with cap space, and even fewer who have the means to add long term large salary.
OKC may have cap space, but they are going to have to increase their salary every year keeping their core.

This bodes well for us being able to keep him at a price that is manageable.
At the same time, we are looking over the next few years at OG, Brunson and Randle making upwards of 120.

The new salary cap stuff is going to make it very painful for fans who want to see young players developed and kept on their home teams.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
Riot Randolph
RealGM
Posts: 11,013
And1: 9,592
Joined: Nov 28, 2011
     

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1002 » by Riot Randolph » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:23 pm

Prepare for timelord and Jarrett Allen
Formerly Knicks85

Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1003 » by nykballa2k4 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:27 pm

BigShot Bojan wrote:Prepare for timelord and Jarrett Allen


If we get Timelord, keep Mitch and retain OG, do all three combine for 100 games?
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,653
And1: 5,779
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1004 » by spree2kawhi » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:37 pm

BigShot Bojan wrote:Prepare for timelord and Jarrett Allen

With Mitch on board, I don’t know about these additions. I like the players per se but I’d be surprised.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,653
And1: 5,779
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1005 » by spree2kawhi » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:40 pm

Wildcat wrote:This obsession with bringing KAT here is ludicrous.

Everybody understands that. He’s a great fit basketball-wise though, just like Markkanen.
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 15,397
And1: 7,970
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1006 » by sol537 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:43 pm

I would not be opposed to trading out Mitch's $12m for some assets and then using part of the MLE ($5m?) to get Looney, instead. More durable player with championship experience to back-up iHart. Use that savings elsewhere...
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1007 » by nykballa2k4 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:01 pm

sol537 wrote:I would not be opposed to trading out Mitch's $12m for some assets and then using part of the MLE ($5m?) to get Looney, instead. More durable player with championship experience to back-up iHart. Use that savings elsewhere...


No interest in Looney, but the concept is fine. The problem is a healthy Mitch is a force that is a problem for basically every team. I don't see much separation between Looney and Precious. Precious moves better, is more athletic. Looney I suppose has a better mid-range game and has been tasked with passing more I guess?

Not going to happen, no way, no how, but I still see that Mitch + Bojan (contract) can land us Ayton.
As much as it hurts, we can let iHart walk if he does not want to accept what we can offer.
At the moment, most mock drafts put Kyle Filipowski in our range, if he is getable, we have to get him.
As for an immediate back up
Ayton-Precious-Sims-Rookie(Kyle Filipowski)
Randle-
OG - Hart
DDV - McBridge
Brunson - Rokas Jokubaitis

Looking at FA's - Obi Toppin is going to be on the open market. Jared Vanderbilt is a FA. Obi would pretty much lock right into the rotation and we would be a VERY deep team which would be needed obviously.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
Appleshampoo
Starter
Posts: 2,300
And1: 1,111
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
     

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1008 » by Appleshampoo » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:34 pm

Siakim is getting 4-years $189M. When Siakim was OG's age he signed a 4 year $136.9 million contract. Salary cap heads can probably figure out what the equivalent of a $35M per year average salary is in 2024.
User avatar
Appleshampoo
Starter
Posts: 2,300
And1: 1,111
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
     

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1009 » by Appleshampoo » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:41 pm

Imagine if the reports of Dolan "wanting a star" are realer than expected. Hell on earth is Dolan putting down his harmonica and Sphere money to whine to Leon Rose, "No going over the cap threshold for OG and IHart cause I want a 'star' instead". It's a Stephen A Smith reading level of Knicks roster construction. Good thing Leon Rose seems to keep Dolan at a safe distance.
douggood
General Manager
Posts: 9,767
And1: 6,551
Joined: Jun 13, 2001

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1010 » by douggood » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:50 pm

Appleshampoo wrote:Siakim is getting 4-years $189M. When Siakim was OG's age he signed a 4 year $136.9 million contract. Salary cap heads can probably figure out what the equivalent of a $35M per year average salary is in 2024.


$136.9 contract he signed when the cap was $109
which makes it equivalent to $177 now when the cap is currently $141
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,188
And1: 3,871
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1011 » by KnixinSix » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:51 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
Wildcat wrote:This obsession with bringing KAT here is ludicrous.

Everybody understands that. He’s a great fit basketball-wise though, just like Markkanen.



He is arguably the best shooting big in the NBA, and subsequently stretches the floor marvelously for Brunson's multiple forays in the paint

The pick and pop with Brunson could be lethal. And open up stuff for Brunson even more.

He can legit play 4 and 5 esp when complemented by a strong defensive 5. (I Hart or Mitch)

He is not a Diva and would not have to be alpha. Yes he had a WCF series but prior to that was very good.

Again he is not nearly my Plan A but we would almost undoubtedly be a much more dynamic team with him on the roster.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,188
And1: 3,871
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1012 » by KnixinSix » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:53 pm

Spree2Houston wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:I feel like we have run out of time waiting patiently for that star. The new CBA now will make it very hard to trade. We are going to be right there at the 2nd Apron. We need to strike now and kind of lock in a team at this point and say let's go for it.

The guy I think becomes the most available is KAT. Not my first choice but I definitely think that him and Brunson could be dynamite together.

KAT has so many connections to the Knicks from Rose, CAA , being a local Jersey kid, and of course the former MINNY head honcho now on our payroll Rosas.

Minny it seems wants the cap relief. Also Naz Reid continues to grow into a potential capable replacement for KAT

If you trade for KAT prior to July 1 his cost is 36M vs 49M.

You trade Bogey (19M) and Mitch Robinson (15M) and another smaller contract plus 3-4FRPs for KAT. This is on the assumption Minny is very averse to the cap ramifications of keeping KAT while we might be willing to take it on.

KAT because of the monster salary is not going to have a huge market .Knicks might be willing to deal with the cap ramifications with a 'locked in' team.

Rotation (minutes):
KAT(16), I-HART (32)
Randle (32), KAT(16)
OG(32), Hart (16)
DDV(32), Hart(16)
Brunson (32), McBride (16)

My 2nd attempted trade I would shoot for is the hope withall that turnover in Detroit they will want to reshape the team a bit. I would trade them Randle and McBride for Isaiah Stwart, Jayden Ivey and Troy Brown. This gives us a more complete , deeper and better fitting Thibodeau team.

Rotation (minutes):
I-HART (32), KAT(8), Stewart (8)
KAT(24), Stewart (16), OG(5), Hart (3)
OG(26), Hart (22)
DDV(30), Ivey (12), Hart(6)
Brunson (32), Jayden Ivey (16)


I thought we can’t combine Bogey’s contract with another player in a trade. Unless there’s something I missed


I believe we can if it is executed in a certain way but not 100% positive.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1013 » by HopelessKnick » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:21 pm

Appleshampoo wrote:Imagine if the reports of Dolan "wanting a star" are realer than expected. Hell on earth is Dolan putting down his harmonica and Sphere money to whine to Leon Rose, "No going over the cap threshold for OG and IHart cause I want a 'star' instead". It's a Stephen A Smith reading level of Knicks roster construction. Good thing Leon Rose seems to keep Dolan at a safe distance.


At this point I doubt even Dolan is silly enough to interfere with what the Knicks are doing. The franchise is really in the best spot it has been since the mid 90s. He isn't going to mess with that IMO.

The other big question is: With the structure of the salary cap and it's punitive nature....does it make more sense to have 2 stars and a strong supporting cast or 3 stars and a much thinner bench. I personally like the first model a lot. Not only for the Knicks but also for the league it is good to have an even distribution of talent.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1014 » by nykballa2k4 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:28 pm

KnixinSix wrote:
Spree2Houston wrote:
KnixinSix wrote:I feel like we have run out of time waiting patiently for that star. The new CBA now will make it very hard to trade. We are going to be right there at the 2nd Apron. We need to strike now and kind of lock in a team at this point and say let's go for it.

The guy I think becomes the most available is KAT. Not my first choice but I definitely think that him and Brunson could be dynamite together.

KAT has so many connections to the Knicks from Rose, CAA , being a local Jersey kid, and of course the former MINNY head honcho now on our payroll Rosas.

Minny it seems wants the cap relief. Also Naz Reid continues to grow into a potential capable replacement for KAT

If you trade for KAT prior to July 1 his cost is 36M vs 49M.

You trade Bogey (19M) and Mitch Robinson (15M) and another smaller contract plus 3-4FRPs for KAT. This is on the assumption Minny is very averse to the cap ramifications of keeping KAT while we might be willing to take it on.

KAT because of the monster salary is not going to have a huge market .Knicks might be willing to deal with the cap ramifications with a 'locked in' team.

Rotation (minutes):
KAT(16), I-HART (32)
Randle (32), KAT(16)
OG(32), Hart (16)
DDV(32), Hart(16)
Brunson (32), McBride (16)

My 2nd attempted trade I would shoot for is the hope withall that turnover in Detroit they will want to reshape the team a bit. I would trade them Randle and McBride for Isaiah Stwart, Jayden Ivey and Troy Brown. This gives us a more complete , deeper and better fitting Thibodeau team.

Rotation (minutes):
I-HART (32), KAT(8), Stewart (8)
KAT(24), Stewart (16), OG(5), Hart (3)
OG(26), Hart (22)
DDV(30), Ivey (12), Hart(6)
Brunson (32), Jayden Ivey (16)


I thought we can’t combine Bogey’s contract with another player in a trade. Unless there’s something I missed


I believe we can if it is executed in a certain way but not 100% positive.


the rules say that as long as it is within 110%. 125% hard caps.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
Appleshampoo
Starter
Posts: 2,300
And1: 1,111
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
     

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1015 » by Appleshampoo » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:33 pm

HopelessKnick wrote:
Appleshampoo wrote:Imagine if the reports of Dolan "wanting a star" are realer than expected. Hell on earth is Dolan putting down his harmonica and Sphere money to whine to Leon Rose, "No going over the cap threshold for OG and IHart cause I want a 'star' instead". It's a Stephen A Smith reading level of Knicks roster construction. Good thing Leon Rose seems to keep Dolan at a safe distance.


At this point I doubt even Dolan is silly enough to interfere with what the Knicks are doing. The franchise is really in the best spot it has been since the mid 90s. He isn't going to mess with that IMO.

The other big question is: With the structure of the salary cap and it's punitive nature....does it make more sense to have 2 stars and a strong supporting cast or 3 stars and a much thinner bench. I personally like the first model a lot. Not only for the Knicks but also for the league it is good to have an even distribution of talent.


I agree, that's the argument against acquiring KAT and his contract. There's other ways to acquire a stretch 5. The nature of the salary cap rewards continuity and distribution of talent. Brunson's ability to find Hartenstein for the floater over and over verse Philly. Best to build on that.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,846
And1: 8,101
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1016 » by WargamesX » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:36 pm

Appleshampoo wrote:
HopelessKnick wrote:
Appleshampoo wrote:Imagine if the reports of Dolan "wanting a star" are realer than expected. Hell on earth is Dolan putting down his harmonica and Sphere money to whine to Leon Rose, "No going over the cap threshold for OG and IHart cause I want a 'star' instead". It's a Stephen A Smith reading level of Knicks roster construction. Good thing Leon Rose seems to keep Dolan at a safe distance.


At this point I doubt even Dolan is silly enough to interfere with what the Knicks are doing. The franchise is really in the best spot it has been since the mid 90s. He isn't going to mess with that IMO.

The other big question is: With the structure of the salary cap and it's punitive nature....does it make more sense to have 2 stars and a strong supporting cast or 3 stars and a much thinner bench. I personally like the first model a lot. Not only for the Knicks but also for the league it is good to have an even distribution of talent.


I agree, that's the argument against acquiring KAT and his contract. There's other ways to acquire a stretch 5. The nature of the salary cap rewards continuity and distribution of talent. Brunson's ability to find Hartenstein for the floater over and over verse Philly. Best to build on that.


Is it even worth investing in a stretch 5 when so much of our offense is offensive rebounds to get second shots?
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
Appleshampoo
Starter
Posts: 2,300
And1: 1,111
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
     

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1017 » by Appleshampoo » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:48 pm

WargamesX wrote:
Appleshampoo wrote:
HopelessKnick wrote:
At this point I doubt even Dolan is silly enough to interfere with what the Knicks are doing. The franchise is really in the best spot it has been since the mid 90s. He isn't going to mess with that IMO.

The other big question is: With the structure of the salary cap and it's punitive nature....does it make more sense to have 2 stars and a strong supporting cast or 3 stars and a much thinner bench. I personally like the first model a lot. Not only for the Knicks but also for the league it is good to have an even distribution of talent.


I agree, that's the argument against acquiring KAT and his contract. There's other ways to acquire a stretch 5. The nature of the salary cap rewards continuity and distribution of talent. Brunson's ability to find Hartenstein for the floater over and over verse Philly. Best to build on that.


Is it even worth investing in a stretch 5 when so much of our offense is offensive rebounds to get second shots?


True.. Thibs + it worked. My minimum expectation is decline Sims club option and add a big with offensive skills beyond screens and rim running. Zach Edey, as an example, is a 70%+ free throw shooter.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,653
And1: 5,779
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1018 » by spree2kawhi » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:53 pm

WargamesX wrote:
Appleshampoo wrote:
HopelessKnick wrote:
At this point I doubt even Dolan is silly enough to interfere with what the Knicks are doing. The franchise is really in the best spot it has been since the mid 90s. He isn't going to mess with that IMO.

The other big question is: With the structure of the salary cap and it's punitive nature....does it make more sense to have 2 stars and a strong supporting cast or 3 stars and a much thinner bench. I personally like the first model a lot. Not only for the Knicks but also for the league it is good to have an even distribution of talent.


I agree, that's the argument against acquiring KAT and his contract. There's other ways to acquire a stretch 5. The nature of the salary cap rewards continuity and distribution of talent. Brunson's ability to find Hartenstein for the floater over and over verse Philly. Best to build on that.


Is it even worth investing in a stretch 5 when so much of our offense is offensive rebounds to get second shots?

Our limited offense is what kept us from advancing / is what will keep us from advancing to the ECF and beyond. The answer is already in your question.
User avatar
Appleshampoo
Starter
Posts: 2,300
And1: 1,111
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
     

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1019 » by Appleshampoo » Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:10 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
Appleshampoo wrote:
I agree, that's the argument against acquiring KAT and his contract. There's other ways to acquire a stretch 5. The nature of the salary cap rewards continuity and distribution of talent. Brunson's ability to find Hartenstein for the floater over and over verse Philly. Best to build on that.


Is it even worth investing in a stretch 5 when so much of our offense is offensive rebounds to get second shots?

Our limited offense is what kept us from advancing / is what will keep us from advancing to the ECF and beyond. The answer is already in your question.


Yeah we need to space the floor better. Hartenstein wasn't known for rebounding with the Clippers. Add in Thibs coaching obsession with offensive boards and there's an overall net-positive addition to be had.

* Jonas Valanciunas :dontknow:
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,941
And1: 4,725
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: More Trades and Transactions Ideas Thread 

Post#1020 » by Wildcat » Wed Jun 19, 2024 9:32 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
Appleshampoo wrote:
I agree, that's the argument against acquiring KAT and his contract. There's other ways to acquire a stretch 5. The nature of the salary cap rewards continuity and distribution of talent. Brunson's ability to find Hartenstein for the floater over and over verse Philly. Best to build on that.


Is it even worth investing in a stretch 5 when so much of our offense is offensive rebounds to get second shots?

Our limited offense is what kept us from advancing / is what will keep us from advancing to the ECF and beyond. The answer is already in your question.


The team's injuries is what kept them from advancing. Hell, they were about to drop the Pacers if OG didn't go down.

Return to New York Knicks