Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Detroit trade - (Ivery, cap space) for (CJ, #21)
Hawks trade - (Capela) for (cap space)
NO's trade - (CJ, #21) for (Ivey, Capela)
Detroit could use spacing & after the season they just had, some veteran leadership, guidance.
Hawks trying to avoid the tax apron, dump an expiring for pure cap space.
NO's turn a veteran creator & elite floor spacer into a rental C & an upside guard. Buys them some time to address the hole at C & gives them an avenue to shed some future salary.
Hawks trade - (Capela) for (cap space)
NO's trade - (CJ, #21) for (Ivey, Capela)
Detroit could use spacing & after the season they just had, some veteran leadership, guidance.
Hawks trying to avoid the tax apron, dump an expiring for pure cap space.
NO's turn a veteran creator & elite floor spacer into a rental C & an upside guard. Buys them some time to address the hole at C & gives them an avenue to shed some future salary.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,448
- And1: 17,247
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
#21 is light, Pistons should consider it if it's the best of LAL/NOP pick in 25...
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Mavrelous wrote:#21 is light, Pistons should consider it if it's the best of LAL/NOP pick in 25...
In the Detroit cap space thread, I worked out the NO's/Lakers 25 pick valued in the teens with lottery protection discussed with Oldncreeky,
The offer above of #21, was from another accepted trade in the Ivey value thread. It's better value for my team so I went with it.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,448
- And1: 17,247
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Whole Truth wrote:Mavrelous wrote:#21 is light, Pistons should consider it if it's the best of LAL/NOP pick in 25...
In the Detroit cap space thread, I worked out the NO's/Lakers 25 pick valued in the teens with lottery protection discussed with Oldncreeky,
The offer above of #21, was from another accepted trade in the Ivey value thread. It's better value for my team so I went with it.
Not sure what were the discussions, but selling 33mils in cap space and Ivey is worth more than #21, Ivey alone is worth more than #21 IMO, one could argue Ivey for #21, but combined with the cap space, it's really hard sell.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,417
- And1: 98,296
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Whole Truth wrote:Detroit trade - (Ivery, cap space) for (CJ, #21)
Hawks trade - (Capela) for (cap space)
NO's trade - (CJ, #21) for (Ivey, Capela)
Please edit in reasons why each team should make the proposed trade per board policy.
Thanks!
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,959
- And1: 4,137
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
This is way too good for New Orleans. They are giving up an albatross contract of a one way player for a quality big and a young guy who still has upside
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,323
- And1: 2,289
- Joined: Nov 23, 2018
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
I know CJ is a good shooter, but I'm not sure he offers enough else to make this trade make sense for Detroit. But, yeah, maybe with a slightly better pick.
I'd still rather aggregate Ivey with another asset or two in hopes of finding a quality 3 and D wing, but maybe we just try to draft that.
I'd still rather aggregate Ivey with another asset or two in hopes of finding a quality 3 and D wing, but maybe we just try to draft that.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Whole Truth wrote:Detroit trade - (Ivery, cap space) for (CJ, #21)
Hawks trade - (Capela) for (cap space)
NO's trade - (CJ, #21) for (Ivey, Capela)
Detroit could use spacing & after the season they just had, some veteran leadership, guidance.
Hawks trying to avoid the tax apron, dump an expiring for pure cap space.
NO's turn a veteran creator & elite floor spacer into a rental C & an upside guard. Buys them some time to address the hole at C & gives them an avenue to shed some future salary.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Mavrelous wrote:Whole Truth wrote:Mavrelous wrote:#21 is light, Pistons should consider it if it's the best of LAL/NOP pick in 25...
In the Detroit cap space thread, I worked out the NO's/Lakers 25 pick valued in the teens with lottery protection discussed with Oldncreeky,
The offer above of #21, was from another accepted trade in the Ivey value thread. It's better value for my team so I went with it.
Not sure what were the discussions, but selling 33mils in cap space and Ivey is worth more than #21, Ivey alone is worth more than #21 IMO, one could argue Ivey for #21, but combined with the cap space, it's really hard sell.
CJ, #21 wasn't mine. It was accepted value in the Ivey value thread of listed trades.
I discussed (CJ, NO's/lakers projected teens, lottery protection), with OnC & would be ok with that.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
daoneandonly wrote:This is way too good for New Orleans. They are giving up an albatross contract of a one way player for a quality big and a young guy who still has upside
Atlanta want to start OO & draft a big, they have to move Capela & might squeeze some value for the expiring C but I assume where they sit financially, they'd prefer the salary dump to a late first & return salary. You mention CJ's contract but Capela is a declining player. I see nothing more than a stop gap option that buys NO's some time to fill a hole.
Ivey realizing his potential is unlikely but I am trading old for young & the disputed difference is a late pick vs one in the teens. This #21 was another posters trade in another thread based on valuing Ivey's value & it was not disputed. I went with it.
Now that I've suggested it & ripping off value, A 25 projected teens pick with lotto protection is what I negotiated with a Detroit mod.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Instead of starting a new thread what do Nets fans think of
Nets S&T (Claxton 20m) for (Ivey, #21)
Detroit trade (Ivey, 28m cap space) for (CJ, NO/Lakers lotto protected)
NO's trade (CJ, NO's/Lakers lotto protected) for (Claxton, 10m cap space)
Nets S&T (Claxton 20m) for (Ivey, #21)
Detroit trade (Ivey, 28m cap space) for (CJ, NO/Lakers lotto protected)
NO's trade (CJ, NO's/Lakers lotto protected) for (Claxton, 10m cap space)
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Not enough value coming back
Would rather just gamble on Ivey's upside over a return like that
Would rather just gamble on Ivey's upside over a return like that
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
MotownMadness wrote:Not enough value coming back
Would rather just gamble on Ivey's upside over a return like that
The teen pick or #21 ?
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Whole Truth wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Not enough value coming back
Would rather just gamble on Ivey's upside over a return like that
The teen pick or #21 ?
Not seeing the teens pick
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
MotownMadness wrote:Whole Truth wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Not enough value coming back
Would rather just gamble on Ivey's upside over a return like that
The teen pick or #21 ?
Not seeing the teens pick
I took the #21 from the Ivey value thread.
I discussed the NO's/Lakers projected teen pick with lotto protection with OldnCreeky. Mention it later in this thread.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Whole Truth wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Whole Truth wrote:
The teen pick or #21 ?
Not seeing the teens pick
I took the #21 from the Ivey value thread.
I discussed the NO's/Lakers projected teen pick with lotto protection with OldnCreeky. Mention it later in this thread.
It's better but not the direction i would go
Would rather package him with something else and get a clear upgrade now
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Forum Mod - Pistons
- Posts: 16,858
- And1: 3,450
- Joined: May 22, 2001
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
I like CJ, but not that contract. There are several teams that will want cap relief - I think Detroit can do better in a trade, or just using it themselves.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
MotownMadness wrote:Whole Truth wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Not seeing the teens pick
I took the #21 from the Ivey value thread.
I discussed the NO's/Lakers projected teen pick with lotto protection with OldnCreeky. Mention it later in this thread.
It's better but not the direction i would go
Would rather package him with something else and get a clear upgrade now
You don't see CJ as an upgrade ? or by upgrade you mean long term ?.
I'm aware CJ is a short term answer but he's shooting 42% on more than 8 APG & is an elite floor spacer, if Detroit looking for that, he should be considered an upgrade. To address the short term solution, is why the pick is offered as the long term value.
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Whole Truth wrote:MotownMadness wrote:Whole Truth wrote:
I took the #21 from the Ivey value thread.
I discussed the NO's/Lakers projected teen pick with lotto protection with OldnCreeky. Mention it later in this thread.
It's better but not the direction i would go
Would rather package him with something else and get a clear upgrade now
You don't see CJ as an upgrade ? or by upgrade you mean long term.
I'm aware CJ is a short term answer but he's shooting 42% on more than 8 APG & is an elite floor spacer, if Detroit looking for that, he should be considered an upgrade. To address the short term solution, is why the pick is offered as the long term value.
Yeah he's too old for us to consider a replacement for a 22 year old on the worst team in the league
Not that hes not a big upgrade though as well
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Detroit, Hawks, NO's, not involving #1
Any Detroit fan care to list some of your preferred targets ?
Return to Trades and Transactions