ImageImageImageImageImage

2024 Draft Thread - Part II

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,670
And1: 4,546
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1861 » by closg00 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:10 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46


Gossip, but at this point I am just hoping we land Sarr, I would be seriously bummed to take Risacher @2. However, we have the excitement of watching to see who may fall to us at 26, 51, + a Kuzma trade watch.
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1862 » by J-Ves » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:30 pm

Oof if ATL takes Clingan and we take Risacher I’ll be absolutely incensed as Buck would say
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,677
And1: 5,263
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1863 » by tontoz » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:33 pm

If we had a poll about who we dont want to draft at 2, Risacher would be my top pick. Bottom tier athlete at the wing who lacks on ball creation...no thanks.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1864 » by DCZards » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:17 pm

I don’t have a problem with drafting Risacher. He’s widely considered the first or second best player in this draft.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,611
And1: 8,843
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1865 » by AFM » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:32 pm

I’d rather have Sheppard personally. But resigned to it being Risacher at this point.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,677
And1: 5,263
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1866 » by tontoz » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:37 pm

If i wanted to trade down it would certainly make sense to feign interest in Sarr/Risacher.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,659
And1: 3,730
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1867 » by Frichuela » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:38 pm

closg00 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46


Gossip, but at this point I am just hoping we land Sarr, I would be seriously bummed to take Risacher @2. However, we have the excitement of watching to see who may fall to us at 26, 51, + a Kuzma trade watch.


Likewise. No Risacher and his tiny hands please…
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1868 » by NatP4 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:44 pm

tontoz wrote:If i wanted to trade down it would certainly make sense to feign interest in Sarr/Risacher.


Can only hope. Haven’t been linked to Sheppard/Topic at all.

Still 1/2 on my “board”
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,982
And1: 4,139
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1869 » by dobrojim » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:01 pm

AFM wrote:I’d rather have Sheppard personally. But resigned to it being Risacher at this point.


Agree on Shep

Not resigned to anything yet. How would we really know?
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,138
And1: 20,590
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1870 » by dckingsfan » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:29 pm

dobrojim wrote:
AFM wrote:I’d rather have Sheppard personally. But resigned to it being Risacher at this point.

Agree on Shep

Not resigned to anything yet. How would we really know?

I know right, I love this FO doesn't tip its hand.
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,152
And1: 5,852
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1871 » by 80sballboy » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:37 pm

I like Sheppard but to get to the next level, we will need stronger defenders. That's what helped win Boston their title. OKC is going to get better and better with long defenders. Is Saar a poor man's Chet? Maybe not, but if he can defend most positions and his offense will get better by 2026-27, it's fine. Risacher would be fine at a lower pick, but I think you can say that about almost everybody in this draft. "Yeah, he's ok, but I don't want him at 2."
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,035
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1872 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:39 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
dobrojim wrote:
AFM wrote:I’d rather have Sheppard personally. But resigned to it being Risacher at this point.

Agree on Shep

Not resigned to anything yet. How would we really know?

I know right, I love this FO doesn't tip its hand.

Yeah, so far, I think the only rumor that there is a compelling reason to believe is that San Antonio is interested in Risacher. I think there is reason to believe it because the rumor was probably leaked from a naive person in the Wemby camp rather than from the Spurs organization itself. I'd say it's probably true that Wemby really wants Risacher, although that doesn't necessarily mean that the Spurs organization is going to bow to Wemby's whims.

Beyond that, I'd say all the other rumors are mostly just Atlanta and perhaps us trying to scare San Antonio into trading up to get Risacher. We may actually be interested in him, I don't know. But the fact that we are rumored to be interested in him is totally independent of whether or not we have actual interest.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,035
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1873 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:41 pm

80sballboy wrote:I like Sheppard but to get to the next level, we will need stronger defenders. That's what helped win Boston their title. OKC is going to get better and better with long defenders. Is Saar a poor man's Chet? Maybe not, but if he can defend most positions and his offense will get better by 2026-27, it's fine. Risacher would be fine at a lower pick, but I think you can say that about almost everybody in this draft. "Yeah, he's ok, but I don't want him at 2."

There's no reason to commit to the Boston model just because Boston won a title. Denver won a title the year before with mediocre defense at the center position and bad defense at the PG and SF positions. I don't see why Sheppard can't be at least as good defensively as Jamaal Murray.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,563
And1: 1,991
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1874 » by gambitx777 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:46 pm

nate33 wrote:
80sballboy wrote:I like Sheppard but to get to the next level, we will need stronger defenders. That's what helped win Boston their title. OKC is going to get better and better with long defenders. Is Saar a poor man's Chet? Maybe not, but if he can defend most positions and his offense will get better by 2026-27, it's fine. Risacher would be fine at a lower pick, but I think you can say that about almost everybody in this draft. "Yeah, he's ok, but I don't want him at 2."

There's no reason to commit to the Boston model just because Boston won a title. Denver won a title the year before with mediocre defense at the center position and bad defense at the PG and SF positions. I don't see why Sheppard can't be at least as good defensively as Jamaal Murray.
Why are we acting like Sheppard can't play defence. His numbers are solid there it's not like he's a scrub you can't garud anyone.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,611
And1: 8,843
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1875 » by AFM » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:48 pm

Why is Sheppard "too short" but Risacher having the vertical of a cubicle worker not a huge issue for the "experts"?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,035
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1876 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 8:17 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
80sballboy wrote:I like Sheppard but to get to the next level, we will need stronger defenders. That's what helped win Boston their title. OKC is going to get better and better with long defenders. Is Saar a poor man's Chet? Maybe not, but if he can defend most positions and his offense will get better by 2026-27, it's fine. Risacher would be fine at a lower pick, but I think you can say that about almost everybody in this draft. "Yeah, he's ok, but I don't want him at 2."

There's no reason to commit to the Boston model just because Boston won a title. Denver won a title the year before with mediocre defense at the center position and bad defense at the PG and SF positions. I don't see why Sheppard can't be at least as good defensively as Jamaal Murray.
Why are we acting like Sheppard can't play defence. His numbers are solid there it's not like he's a scrub you can't garud anyone.

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using RealGM mobile app

Sheppard got blown by a bit too often for my tastes. He has excellent defensive instincts off ball, and he has great hands and quick reaction time to challenge shots, but his defensive footwork is poor when on ball. He needs some work there.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,677
And1: 5,263
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1877 » by tontoz » Thu Jun 20, 2024 8:22 pm

I think part of Sheppards problem on D is just bad habits. Sometimes it really seemed like he would let someone drive past him just so he could try to get a block or steal from behind.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
jangles86
Starter
Posts: 2,381
And1: 982
Joined: Jun 02, 2011
 

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1878 » by jangles86 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 8:25 pm

Tidjane Saluan is great mates is Victor Welbanyama.
Bilal Coulibaly is good friends with Wembanyama.

Trade 2&26 for 4&8 to spurs.

Take Castle and Salaun.

Draft Traore in 2025

Sign Wemby as free agent in 5 years.

Wemby
Saluan
Couli
Castle
Traore
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1879 » by DCZards » Thu Jun 20, 2024 8:35 pm

nate33 wrote:
80sballboy wrote:I like Sheppard but to get to the next level, we will need stronger defenders. That's what helped win Boston their title. OKC is going to get better and better with long defenders. Is Saar a poor man's Chet? Maybe not, but if he can defend most positions and his offense will get better by 2026-27, it's fine. Risacher would be fine at a lower pick, but I think you can say that about almost everybody in this draft. "Yeah, he's ok, but I don't want him at 2."

There's no reason to commit to the Boston model just because Boston won a title. Denver won a title the year before with mediocre defense at the center position and bad defense at the PG and SF positions. I don't see why Sheppard can't be at least as good defensively as Jamaal Murray.

Yeah…but Denver got sent home this year by a team with great defense (Minny) and when Denver won it all it helped that they had solid wing defenders like KCP and Bruce Brown.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,670
And1: 4,546
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2024 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#1880 » by closg00 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 9:28 pm

First pre draft shoe to drop
Read on Twitter

Return to Washington Wizards