Capn'O wrote:Cason Wallace availabile?
Doubt it. He was solid for them last year and he on a rookie deal.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85
Capn'O wrote:Cason Wallace availabile?

Capn'O wrote:Cason Wallace availabile?
mpharris36 wrote:Paul George would have to be ok with changing his role up. Especially if we are keeping Randle in the trade. PG would have to be ok taking much less usage (probably 3rd on the team) and go back to impacting the game more defensively since that end has slipped a bit over the years.
TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Paul George would have to be ok with changing his role up. Especially if we are keeping Randle in the trade. PG would have to be ok taking much less usage (probably 3rd on the team) and go back to impacting the game more defensively since that end has slipped a bit over the years.
He may as well don’t even think about coming then.PG won’t take a 3rd seat to Brunson and Randle, even taking second banana to Brunson is asking to much of him prob. PG ain’t mentally there yet imo.
You might be able to squeeze second on the pecking order but def not 3rd. Don’t think Randle has enough cache yet. Brunson is on the cusp , so the best you can get is second and even then he gonna want the rock a lot still.
PG is still good at basketball contrary to what a lot of people think.
DaGawd wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Paul George would have to be ok with changing his role up. Especially if we are keeping Randle in the trade. PG would have to be ok taking much less usage (probably 3rd on the team) and go back to impacting the game more defensively since that end has slipped a bit over the years.
He may as well don’t even think about coming then.PG won’t take a 3rd seat to Brunson and Randle, even taking second banana to Brunson is asking to much of him prob. PG ain’t mentally there yet imo.
You might be able to squeeze second on the pecking order but def not 3rd. Don’t think Randle has enough cache yet. Brunson is on the cusp , so the best you can get is second and even then he gonna want the rock a lot still.
PG is still good at basketball contrary to what a lot of people think.
i don’t think anyone is arguing he isn’t good at basketball. he’s def proven that, but he’s also proven he’s not a top 15 nba player probably. not at 34 years old. brunson would still be the unquestioned number 1 option if we got pg


technically , I think he’s just trying to have a convoTerrenceClarke wrote:Wildcat wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:
I would actually take a chip run serious with PG on the squad.
I’m not in the camp that Brunson should be the #1 to get us a chip.
But you would take a 34 year old PG as #1? That's some serious backward logic.
The first butt hurt comment.
I don’t care about age.
Im thinking about Jru Holiday.
Cry somewhere else cause I have my own opinion.
If you don’t think PG on this squad being featured takes us to another level I don’t know what to tell you.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
Capn'O wrote:aggo wrote:RHODEY wrote:
cliffs??
It's more of an update for lay folks. I didn't see anything new.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
BigShot Bojan wrote:technically , I think he’s just trying to have a convoTerrenceClarke wrote:Wildcat wrote:
But you would take a 34 year old PG as #1? That's some serious backward logic.
The first butt hurt comment.
I don’t care about age.
Im thinking about Jru Holiday.
Cry somewhere else cause I have my own opinion.
If you don’t think PG on this squad being featured takes us to another level I don’t know what to tell you.
8516knicks wrote:Another wild thought - if Philly has so much money, let's help them spend some. Offer Maxey the max. No prayer of getting him but Philly's bank account drained a bit.
DaGawd wrote:8516knicks wrote:Another wild thought - if Philly has so much money, let's help them spend some. Offer Maxey the max. No prayer of getting him but Philly's bank account drained a bit.
lol you know we don’t have any where close to the money to offer maxey the max right?
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.

TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Paul George would have to be ok with changing his role up. Especially if we are keeping Randle in the trade. PG would have to be ok taking much less usage (probably 3rd on the team) and go back to impacting the game more defensively since that end has slipped a bit over the years.
He may as well don’t even think about coming then.PG won’t take a 3rd seat to Brunson and Randle, even taking second banana to Brunson is asking to much of him prob. PG ain’t mentally there yet imo.
You might be able to squeeze second on the pecking order but def not 3rd. Don’t think Randle has enough cache yet. Brunson is on the cusp , so the best you can get is second and even then he gonna want the rock a lot still.
PG is still good at basketball contrary to what a lot of people think.
mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Paul George would have to be ok with changing his role up. Especially if we are keeping Randle in the trade. PG would have to be ok taking much less usage (probably 3rd on the team) and go back to impacting the game more defensively since that end has slipped a bit over the years.
He may as well don’t even think about coming then.PG won’t take a 3rd seat to Brunson and Randle, even taking second banana to Brunson is asking to much of him prob. PG ain’t mentally there yet imo.
You might be able to squeeze second on the pecking order but def not 3rd. Don’t think Randle has enough cache yet. Brunson is on the cusp , so the best you can get is second and even then he gonna want the rock a lot still.
PG is still good at basketball contrary to what a lot of people think.
Brunson is a legit superstar in his prime. He would no doubt not jump above him on the pecking order. Maybe you can make the case more on Randle. But if Randle is a #3 option you might as well not even have randle on the roster. He's not a catch and shoot floor spacing big.
PG is good. No one is arguing that. Someone always has to take a back seat when you have 3 options. That is why I said he would have to be ready for that .
This is Brunson team and whoever we get needs to compliment him.

mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Paul George would have to be ok with changing his role up. Especially if we are keeping Randle in the trade. PG would have to be ok taking much less usage (probably 3rd on the team) and go back to impacting the game more defensively since that end has slipped a bit over the years.
He may as well don’t even think about coming then.PG won’t take a 3rd seat to Brunson and Randle, even taking second banana to Brunson is asking to much of him prob. PG ain’t mentally there yet imo.
You might be able to squeeze second on the pecking order but def not 3rd. Don’t think Randle has enough cache yet. Brunson is on the cusp , so the best you can get is second and even then he gonna want the rock a lot still.
PG is still good at basketball contrary to what a lot of people think.
Brunson is a legit superstar in his prime. He would no doubt not jump above him on the pecking order. Maybe you can make the case more on Randle. But if Randle is a #3 option you might as well not even have randle on the roster. He's not a catch and shoot floor spacing big.
PG is good. No one is arguing that. Someone always has to take a back seat when you have 3 options. That is why I said he would have to be ready for that .
This is Brunson team and whoever we get needs to compliment him.
DaGawd wrote:8516knicks wrote:Another wild thought - if Philly has so much money, let's help them spend some. Offer Maxey the max. No prayer of getting him but Philly's bank account drained a bit.
lol you know we don’t have any where close to the money to offer maxey the max right?
8516knicks wrote:DaGawd wrote:8516knicks wrote:Another wild thought - if Philly has so much money, let's help them spend some. Offer Maxey the max. No prayer of getting him but Philly's bank account drained a bit.
lol you know we don’t have any where close to the money to offer maxey the max right?
But if they pick off OG and we cut Bogs? Get Maxey and they aren't going anywhere.