tontoz wrote:Sarr's game tells me he doesn't want to play C. He is undersized for C and seems contact averse.
Doesn’t bode well if we need him to battle for rebounds and defend behemoth Centers, get Edey on this team somehow, Sarr PF/Edey C
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
tontoz wrote:Sarr's game tells me he doesn't want to play C. He is undersized for C and seems contact averse.
DCZards wrote:Dat2U wrote:DCZards wrote:I don’t see a league dominated by skilled smaller guards. I see one increasingly dominated by big guards and wings like Ant, SGA, Murray, Brown and Haliburton.
I'll give you (10) 6-3 and under guys that any team would love to have. Skill still matters. Ja is 6-2 174. Trae 6-1 164. I'm not worried about a guy like Dilly. I'm worried about a guy like Castle who lacks the skills to play PG but is demanding to play it lol.
Jalen Brunson
Kyrie Irving
Stephen Curry
Donovan Mitchell
Tyrese Maxey
Trae Young
Damian Lillard
De'Aaron Fox
Ja Morant
Fred VanVleet
I have nothing against 6-3 and smaller players. And, yes, skill still matters. But there’s a reason why my list of 5 players has 3 All-NBA players and your list of 10 players has 2.
Three of the best players on your list (Curry, Lillard, Irving) are over 30. All of the players on my list are 27 or younger.
There will always be a place in the NBA for skilled small guards, but it's pretty obvious that the future is trending toward longer, taller, bigger guards and wings who can score AND defend.
nate33 wrote:tontoz wrote:Sarr's game tells me he doesn't want to play C. He is undersized for C and seems contact averse.
If he wants to play power forward, he has to become a MUCH better shooter.
Frankly, I'm pretty confident that Bilal will end up as a better power forward than Sarr will. If Sarr is worried about his fit in Atlanta because he wants to play PF, he needs to be just as worried about his fit here. We've got 3 guys who can play PF better than he can.
closg00 wrote:tontoz wrote:Sarr's game tells me he doesn't want to play C. He is undersized for C and seems contact averse.
Doesn’t bode well if we need him to battle for rebounds and defend behemoth Centers, get Edey on this team somehow, Sarr PF/Edey C

Dat2U wrote:Ant & Brown are clearly wings. Most wings are 6-5 or taller. Are we having a discussion about PGs who tend to be the shortest guys on the court or about any position in general?
Haliburton is 6-4 but a terrible defender. Murray is 6-4 and poor defender. Height hasn't helped either defend.
***It also hasn't really mattered in terms of personal or team success since most PGs are not impactful defenders.
There's currently no active player that's a true two-way PG. This player only exists in theory atm: i.e. - A guy that's equally imposing offensively as he is defensively. If a PG is a good defender, by default he also a game manager ... it appears that it simply takes too much energy for PGs to be both the engine of the offense and a lock down POA defender***
I've even broken down the top 43 PGs based on their strengths.
Elite offense/no defense (11)
Luka Doncic
Jalen Brunson
Tyrese Haliburton
Damian Lillard
Kyrie Irving
Tyrese Maxey
Jamal Murray
LaMelo Ball
James Harden
Trae Young
Ja Morant
Elite offense/ok defense (3)
Donovan Mitchell
Stephen Curry
De'Aaron Fox
Good offense/bad defense (11)
C.J. McCollum
Malcolm Brogdon
D'Angelo Russell
T.J. McConnell
Bradley Beal
Dejounte Murray
Payton Pritchard
Immanuel Quickley
Darius Garland
Coby White
Tyus Jones
Good offense (game managers) /good defense (5)
Fred VanVleet
Mike Conley
Jrue Holiday
Tre Jones
Chris Paul
Ok offense / bad defense (4)
Josh Giddey
Jaden Ivey
Dennis Schroder
Tre Mann
Bad offense / ok defense (7)
Russell Westbrook
Kyle Lowry
Ben Simmons
Miles McBride
Cason Wallace
Patrick Beverley
Jordan Goodwin
Bad offense/elite defense (2)
Marcus Smart
Dennis Smith Jr
jangles86 wrote:A few mocks have Nikola Topic falling as far as 20th!!
Could we move up from 26th to get him in early 20’s?
Take Sarr and Topic?!
tontoz wrote:nate33 wrote:tontoz wrote:Sarr's game tells me he doesn't want to play C. He is undersized for C and seems contact averse.
If he wants to play power forward, he has to become a MUCH better shooter.
Frankly, I'm pretty confident that Bilal will end up as a better power forward than Sarr will. If Sarr is worried about his fit in Atlanta because he wants to play PF, he needs to be just as worried about his fit here.We've got 3 guys who can play PF better than he :
wink: can.
Which is why i havent been intersted in Sarr all season.
SUPERBALLMAN wrote::wink:tontoz wrote:nate33 wrote:If he wants to play power forward, he has to become a MUCH better shooter.
Frankly, I'm pretty confident that Bilal will end up as a better power forward than Sarr will. If Sarr is worried about his fit in Atlanta because he wants to play PF, he needs to be just as worried about his fit here.We've got 3 guys who can play PF better than he :
wink: can.
Which is why i havent been intersted in Sarr all season.
If he doesn’t want to play Center, I honestly think I might prefer Buzelis.
But maybe that’s just me (and maybe Jahidi).
tontoz wrote:Sarr's game tells me he doesn't want to play C. He is undersized for C and seems contact averse.
gambitx777 wrote:Why are we acting like Sheppard can't play defence. His numbers are solid there it's not like he's a scrub you can't garud anyone.nate33 wrote:80sballboy wrote:I like Sheppard but to get to the next level, we will need stronger defenders. That's what helped win Boston their title. OKC is going to get better and better with long defenders. Is Saar a poor man's Chet? Maybe not, but if he can defend most positions and his offense will get better by 2026-27, it's fine. Risacher would be fine at a lower pick, but I think you can say that about almost everybody in this draft. "Yeah, he's ok, but I don't want him at 2."
There's no reason to commit to the Boston model just because Boston won a title. Denver won a title the year before with mediocre defense at the center position and bad defense at the PG and SF positions. I don't see why Sheppard can't be at least as good defensively as Jamaal Murray.
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:If we believe Shepperd can be at least an average defender, I'm kind of starting to like the idea of picking him.
SUPERBALLMAN wrote::wink:tontoz wrote:nate33 wrote:If he wants to play power forward, he has to become a MUCH better shooter.
Frankly, I'm pretty confident that Bilal will end up as a better power forward than Sarr will. If Sarr is worried about his fit in Atlanta because he wants to play PF, he needs to be just as worried about his fit here.We've got 3 guys who can play PF better than he :
wink: can.
Which is why i havent been intersted in Sarr all season.
If he doesn’t want to play Center, I honestly think I might prefer Buzelis.
But maybe that’s just me (and maybe Jahidi).

nate33 wrote:I trust our talent evaluators. I'm glad they brought Sarr in, interviewed him, and worked him out. If they draft him, I'm going to assume it's because they have faith that Sarr will ultimately pan out as a center.
It's going to take a while though. As NatP4 points out, Sarr doesn't really do any of the things that a center needs to do. The next screen he sets will be his first; he's not comfortable at all in drop coverage against a pick-and-roll; and his defensive rebounding is pretty poor (though that might be explained by Perth's scheme as was discussed in an article I posted a while ago).

The Wizards are likely to remain at No. 2 as well, where Washington has the league convinced its focused on selecting Alex Sarr from the Perth Wildcats. The Wizards, according to people familiar with the situation, invested the most time and resources of any NBA club sending various personnel to Australia to evaluate Sarr. This situation is also considered the preferred outcome from Sarr’s camp, as it’s become well known that Sarr has so far declined to work out for Atlanta. Washington does also hold the No. 26 pick and is a prime candidate to potentially move up from that slot, sources said, in addition to the Wizards trying to find a third first-round choice.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
Rafael122 wrote:From Jake Fischer:The Wizards are likely to remain at No. 2 as well, where Washington has the league convinced its focused on selecting Alex Sarr from the Perth Wildcats. The Wizards, according to people familiar with the situation, invested the most time and resources of any NBA club sending various personnel to Australia to evaluate Sarr. This situation is also considered the preferred outcome from Sarr’s camp, as it’s become well known that Sarr has so far declined to work out for Atlanta. Washington does also hold the No. 26 pick and is a prime candidate to potentially move up from that slot, sources said, in addition to the Wizards trying to find a third first-round choice.
Only way we get an additional first is if we trade Kuzma. I'd trade Kuzma for Huerter and the 13th pick. Pick up Sarr at 2, Bub at 13 and BPA at 26.