D.Brasco wrote:
*Not an actual argument, just a cool photo of LeBron blocking a 7 footer.
MJ would've been credited for 4 blocks on that play.
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
D.Brasco wrote:
*Not an actual argument, just a cool photo of LeBron blocking a 7 footer.
CBS7 wrote:Ritzo wrote:CBS7 wrote:
Gasol had a better DWS, DBPM, DRTG, averaged more stocks, and his team finished #2 in DRTG to LeBron's #9.
"robbed"
Hakeem led all those stats over MJ, and MJ's DBPM wasn't even top 10 that year. But I bet you wouldn't say he robbed Hakeem.
He didn't lead all those stats over MJ.
However, with the new information that came to light, I think its fair to consider that MJ didn't deserve that DPOY.
Ritzo wrote:CBS7 wrote:Ritzo wrote:Hakeem led all those stats over MJ, and MJ's DBPM wasn't even top 10 that year. But I bet you wouldn't say he robbed Hakeem.
He didn't lead all those stats over MJ.
However, with the new information that came to light, I think its fair to consider that MJ didn't deserve that DPOY.
- Hakeem 98.05 DRTG (1st) MJ 101.47 (6th)
- Hakeem 6.82 DWS (1st) MJ 6.07 (3rd)
But ok
Johnny Bball wrote:ScrantonBulls wrote:D.Brasco wrote:
*Not an actual argument, just a cool photo of LeBron blocking a 7 footer.
This is obviously fake news AI generated by Klutch to advance the LeBron James GOAT Replacement Theory. Nice try, Brasco. We're not going to fall for it.
LOL! He blocked Tiago Splitter. True accomplishment.
And he's not 7'.
It is a cool photo though.
ballzboyee wrote:How is this even a debate? Jordan was All-Defensive 1st Team basically every year he was in the league, including his final season in 1998 at or near his prime at age 35. Lebron not has made an All-Defensive team in 10 years or since he was 30-years-old. Lebron was still in his prime when he stopped being All-League level defender, and that is because he does not put in the effort on both ends. He deliberately chose to embrace a heliocentric offensive style of play in which acted as his team's main facilitator even when he had an all-star level point guard, so he has coasted on one-side of the ball.
Jordan is also a better lockdown perimeter man defender. Jordan's steal and block numbers per 100 are better. Jordan led the league in defensive DBPM twice, etc. Lebron has led the league in DPBM only once but that would have been Jordan's fourth best defensive year accordiing to that metric. Lebron second best DBPM score would also only rank good enough for Jordan's fourth best season. Jordan's DBPM peak is higher. Jordan's steal and block percentages are better. Jordan was a very aggressive man defender who made a lot of timely plays that impacted the game. Both Pippen and Jordan played very smothering style of defense in which they would attack the ball handler at all levels of the court, including full court. There are so many examples of Jordan and Pippen trapping the ball early in an offensive set. Jordan was a master at ball pressure and generating steals in routine situations against very good ball handlers.
I guess you could argue that because of Lebron's size he has more utility as a post defender, but Lebron played in a era in which the opposing offensive best player has typically been a perimeter scorer. Just look at the teams that have been Lebron's rival of the years... Paul George, Paul Pierce, Dirk, Spurs with Manu and Kawhi, and the GSW with Curry, Durant, and Klay. Anyway, there was no way Lebron could play man defense against a true center like Jokic or Duncan in the post in the playoffs. He's big but he not that big, and coaches don't typically like to get their players in foul trouble like that. Those guys would just hammer Lebron in the post. He's still too small. It's just sort of a moot hypothetical assertion to claim that he is capable of that kind of defensive versatility in games that actually matter. Also, as a bigger perimeter defender, Lebron is susceptible to switches against smaller, quicker guards. Size comes with its disadvantages also.
therealbig3 wrote:ballzboyee wrote:How is this even a debate? Jordan was All-Defensive 1st Team basically every year he was in the league, including his final season in 1998 at or near his prime at age 35. Lebron not has made an All-Defensive team in 10 years or since he was 30-years-old. Lebron was still in his prime when he stopped being All-League level defender, and that is because he does not put in the effort on both ends. He deliberately chose to embrace a heliocentric offensive style of play in which acted as his team's main facilitator even when he had an all-star level point guard, so he has coasted on one-side of the ball.
Jordan is also a better lockdown perimeter man defender. Jordan's steal and block numbers per 100 are better. Jordan led the league in defensive DBPM twice, etc. Lebron has led the league in DPBM only once but that would have been Jordan's fourth best defensive year accordiing to that metric. Lebron second best DBPM score would also only rank good enough for Jordan's fourth best season. Jordan's DBPM peak is higher. Jordan's steal and block percentages are better. Jordan was a very aggressive man defender who made a lot of timely plays that impacted the game. Both Pippen and Jordan played very smothering style of defense in which they would attack the ball handler at all levels of the court, including full court. There are so many examples of Jordan and Pippen trapping the ball early in an offensive set. Jordan was a master at ball pressure and generating steals in routine situations against very good ball handlers.
I guess you could argue that because of Lebron's size he has more utility as a post defender, but Lebron played in a era in which the opposing offensive best player has typically been a perimeter scorer. Just look at the teams that have been Lebron's rival of the years... Paul George, Paul Pierce, Dirk, Spurs with Manu and Kawhi, and the GSW with Curry, Durant, and Klay. Anyway, there was no way Lebron could play man defense against a true center like Jokic or Duncan in the post in the playoffs. He's big but he not that big, and coaches don't typically like to get their players in foul trouble like that. Those guys would just hammer Lebron in the post. He's still too small. It's just sort of a moot hypothetical assertion to claim that he is capable of that kind of defensive versatility in games that actually matter. Also, as a bigger perimeter defender, Lebron is susceptible to switches against smaller, quicker guards. Size comes with its disadvantages also.
I’d say that LeBron didn’t get reputation All-D selections like Jordan and Kobe did, even when he was worthy of it. I thought he was excellent defensively in 2020 for example.
“Stocks” are a really poor way to measure defense, and by extension so is DPM, since it’s based on the box score. We have actual +/- data that shows LeBron being an outstanding historically good wing defender throughout his prime, ESPECIALLY in the playoffs. We also have evidence that the box score stats were severely overinflated for Jordan in order to make him look good and help him get that DPOY in 1988.
As defenders, Jordan was much more of a high risk high reward defender who fortunately had excellent defenders flanking him. LeBron is much more fundamentally sound and actually anchors his team and directs his teammates. He diagnoses what the offense is doing and subsequently blows it up. He’s bigger and stronger and far more versatile than Jordan. It’s not just about man defense or box score stats. He’s capable of switching onto bigger players and battling them for position and grabbing rebounds. He’s more of a rim deterrent just because of his size and strength. And as far as his perimeter defense, pretty much it’s just the small quick guards that could attack LeBron better than Jordan…and yet, Westbrook, Rose, and Parker all struggled against him. As did Curry. He didn’t really give up much while anchoring his teams’ defense AND being a much better defender against bigger and stronger players.
LeBron has been far more deserving of a DPOY than Jordan ever was as far as actual defensive impact is concerned. His teams fell apart defensively without him, in the playoffs especially. Jordan’s teams didn’t have that happen.
CobraCommander wrote:therealbig3 wrote:ballzboyee wrote:How is this even a debate? Jordan was All-Defensive 1st Team basically every year he was in the league, including his final season in 1998 at or near his prime at age 35. Lebron not has made an All-Defensive team in 10 years or since he was 30-years-old. Lebron was still in his prime when he stopped being All-League level defender, and that is because he does not put in the effort on both ends. He deliberately chose to embrace a heliocentric offensive style of play in which acted as his team's main facilitator even when he had an all-star level point guard, so he has coasted on one-side of the ball.
Jordan is also a better lockdown perimeter man defender. Jordan's steal and block numbers per 100 are better. Jordan led the league in defensive DBPM twice, etc. Lebron has led the league in DPBM only once but that would have been Jordan's fourth best defensive year accordiing to that metric. Lebron second best DBPM score would also only rank good enough for Jordan's fourth best season. Jordan's DBPM peak is higher. Jordan's steal and block percentages are better. Jordan was a very aggressive man defender who made a lot of timely plays that impacted the game. Both Pippen and Jordan played very smothering style of defense in which they would attack the ball handler at all levels of the court, including full court. There are so many examples of Jordan and Pippen trapping the ball early in an offensive set. Jordan was a master at ball pressure and generating steals in routine situations against very good ball handlers.
I guess you could argue that because of Lebron's size he has more utility as a post defender, but Lebron played in a era in which the opposing offensive best player has typically been a perimeter scorer. Just look at the teams that have been Lebron's rival of the years... Paul George, Paul Pierce, Dirk, Spurs with Manu and Kawhi, and the GSW with Curry, Durant, and Klay. Anyway, there was no way Lebron could play man defense against a true center like Jokic or Duncan in the post in the playoffs. He's big but he not that big, and coaches don't typically like to get their players in foul trouble like that. Those guys would just hammer Lebron in the post. He's still too small. It's just sort of a moot hypothetical assertion to claim that he is capable of that kind of defensive versatility in games that actually matter. Also, as a bigger perimeter defender, Lebron is susceptible to switches against smaller, quicker guards. Size comes with its disadvantages also.
I’d say that LeBron didn’t get reputation All-D selections like Jordan and Kobe did, even when he was worthy of it. I thought he was excellent defensively in 2020 for example.
“Stocks” are a really poor way to measure defense, and by extension so is DPM, since it’s based on the box score. We have actual +/- data that shows LeBron being an outstanding historically good wing defender throughout his prime, ESPECIALLY in the playoffs. We also have evidence that the box score stats were severely overinflated for Jordan in order to make him look good and help him get that DPOY in 1988.
As defenders, Jordan was much more of a high risk high reward defender who fortunately had excellent defenders flanking him. LeBron is much more fundamentally sound and actually anchors his team and directs his teammates. He diagnoses what the offense is doing and subsequently blows it up. He’s bigger and stronger and far more versatile than Jordan. It’s not just about man defense or box score stats. He’s capable of switching onto bigger players and battling them for position and grabbing rebounds. He’s more of a rim deterrent just because of his size and strength. And as far as his perimeter defense, pretty much it’s just the small quick guards that could attack LeBron better than Jordan…and yet, Westbrook, Rose, and Parker all struggled against him. As did Curry. He didn’t really give up much while anchoring his teams’ defense AND being a much better defender against bigger and stronger players.
LeBron has been far more deserving of a DPOY than Jordan ever was as far as actual defensive impact is concerned. His teams fell apart defensively without him, in the playoffs especially. Jordan’s teams didn’t have that happen.
You have to let us know your age when you make this debate - not that I will discredit you because of youth It’s just I can’t make a nuanced arguement for or against magic and bird cause I only saw the very ends of their careers with mature eyes - with mj and Lebron I saw the entirety of both-
people that watched both of them don’t make this argument. Lebron litterally never went out of his way to stop anyone ever - never had a period where he was focused on defense or being the best defender possible, especially when he realized (based on him stopping being all defense after 30) to be his best he needed to focus on offense and get other guys to play wing defense. In a way, I don’t blame Lebron for being less than Jordan on defense because the league has devalued defense. Even Giannis has stopped being as locked in on defense in an effort to maximize energy expenditure on offense.
I think the question of if LeBron could have been as good as a defender in Jordan’s era or vice versa is more appropriate considering the rules changes
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog
1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
JohnnyKILLroy wrote:Lebron sucks on defense.
It’s all about effort and he’s always ducked guarding the other teams best player consistently all the time. He takes no pride in it, if he did he’d have all the hardware to back it up. With his physical gifts he should’ve been an all time defensive GOAT.
If he played defense like Jordan did he also would’ve had a career that lasts half as long as whatever he ends up retiring with. He’s a bum on defense.
The4thHorseman wrote:D.Brasco wrote:
*Not an actual argument, just a cool photo of LeBron blocking a 7 footer.
MJ would've been credited for 4 blocks on that play.
90sAllDecade wrote:LeBron was very good some years but it's Jordan here pretty clearly to me. Personally, I think the 'he's bigger and just as good so he's a better defender' idea is a lazy take.
Even though he was not as big Jordan was just as good or perhaps a better shot blocker than LeBron at his peak. Blows him out on steals, perimeter defense, etc. His calling card was his intense competitive nature; he'd guard stars and dominate them on both ends.
KembaWalker wrote:LeBron guarding 1-5 is such a meme, dudes been getting hidden on the easiest matchup for over 15 years now. Acting everyone didn’t watch him spend 90% of 2011 matched on Kidd and Stevenson
The Explorer wrote:
James has been a poor defender for several years of his career. His teammates even had to push him to get in the right position. He offers very little on the defensive end for the past several seasons. Also around 75-80%% of his defensive rebounds are uncontested (tracking began in 2015), which for his size, is underwhelming. Westbrook got killed for that, but James was doing it just the same.
Jordan led the league in steals 3x, it's clear as day that Jordan had some of the best hands in NBA history. Jordan was more consistent, more durable, and had a higher motor.
Jordan also was a better shot blocker. Jordan is the only SG to have multiple 100 block seasons. Lebron was never among the top shot blockers for his position. He blocked shots in basically any scenario - in transition, on the ball, putbacks, off-ball & weak-side help.
Steals and blocks are not everything on defense, but it's clear his disruption caused great havoc on opposing offenses. There was less need for the Bulls bigs to protect the paint when Jordan was shutting them down on the perimeter.
There were questions during Lebron's peak in 2011 finals if he could guard and stay in front of Jason Terry. He couldn't, he got crushed on blow-bys from Terry far too many times.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
LaLover11 wrote:LeBron is the greatest fast break defender of all time!
He's also the most versatile that guarded MVP Rose, Durant, PG, Zion, Jokic
That's something MJ could never do!
?t=t36EScEfqhVuIjyASKZkBQ&s=19