Knightro wrote:SOUL wrote:Knightro wrote:But they don’t care. Don’t create expectations and you’ll never be criticized for not reaching them.
Didn't care their way into 50 wins with the 4th youngest roster in the league.

1. They didn’t win 50.
2. I’d argue they had those results in spite of their plan, not because of it.
Last year’s results were great, it was a fun season. But ultimately it was bad process. They could have gone further than they did or they could have better positioned themselves for this upcoming season and they did neither.
And I get that I sound like one of these people who can’t be pleased, but that’s ok with me. I have high expectations because I believe in the young core and don’t want to see these guys screw it up by just waiting for it to maybe happen rather than being proactive and actually trying to help it happen.
I agree with your "supportive but anxious" position
They had a great season, but there's a few question marks that, maybe, even if it didn't lead to second round or even more wins...could have "stabilized" the team and/or took away some of the continued concerns. There was certainly some good fortune last season, particularly injuries (not to us AND to others) that could/should make fans and FO cautiously optimistic but not content going forward.
My criticisms of a job really well done otherwise...
-Fultz should have been gone, ideally to WAS with a frp for a Tyus test-drive. Fultz' experiment needs to be over and I still can't believe that AB rode the bench while Fultz picked up so many minutes in the second half of the year, even after it was evident that he was significantly hampered and not even seriously considering shooting from any kind of range. By the playoffs, it was too late to just 'work in' the largely untested rookie, but still could, arguably, have helped more than Fultz. I'm a big supporter of the Fultz salvage experiment - I'm also aware enough to see that it very definitely didn't work out, so tap out already, years and millions later.
-The Jett thing is still TBD...on a team with some of the worst shooting in the NBA, despite two of the biggest double and triple-team drawing point forwards in the league, he didn't even get a real looking at. It could be a master stroke of player development and tactical, patient, 4-D Chess, blah blah...but I'm not sold on the G-League helping anyone become a better NBA player. G-League Ignite has to be considered a fail...as its esteemed alumni have all disappointed at the NBA level. For a couple of years, they got some of the highest upside draftees, many of them are or will be good players - but they came in LESS ready than even guys who got only one year of college coaching. I still think major programs with esteemed Coaches (who can actually criticize a child-star without losing their job) still is the best route of development.
-The "hand it to Paolo or Franz 25 feet from the rim and watch him work" offense was extremely limited and predictable and, hopefully, more of a band-aid solution to the lack of decent guard play than an actual plan. Finishing out the season and playoffs with Suggs and Harris at the two guard spots is a cry for help, imo. They're effectively the same good, but extremely limited, players. One of them just happens to younger, better, and still growing...but that doesn't make either one a PG or even, really, a Combo Guard.
I'm not angry or whining, just looking at where we are and how we move forward. Great season...let's have a great summer.