Atl-SA-Clev-NO

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,344
And1: 4,265
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#1 » by pipfan » Mon Jun 24, 2024 9:11 pm

I think this would work, and help all 4 teams

ATL sends Murray to NO
ATL gets #8 and their '25 pick back, plus their '26 swap erased

NO sends BI to Clev
NO gets Murray

Clev sends Garland to SA
Clev gets BI

SA sends #8 to Atl and their '25 pick plus the '26 swap
SA gets Garland

ATL saves a bunch of $ and adds BPA at #8 (Carter?), and gets their pick back. They pick Sarr at #1
Young/Carter
Griffin/Bogs/Bufkin
Hunter/Bogs/Griffin
Johnson/Sarr/Okongwu
Capela/Sarr/Okongwu

NO balances out their team. BI might be a bit of a better player but is in a worse contract situation than Murray

Clev balances their team Mitchell/Struss/BI/Mobley/Allen is a VERY nice lineup.

SA gets a young PG to grow with. I think they should make a move for Risacher too, and they'd be set
Garland/Jones
Vassell/Branham/KJ
Risacher/KJ
Sochan/KJ
Wemby/Collins

Use #4 and the Chi '25 pick to move up to take Risacher, and Wash gets Clingon at #4

Thoughts?
sterncohen
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,421
And1: 58
Joined: Oct 07, 2006

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#2 » by sterncohen » Mon Jun 24, 2024 9:23 pm

I think this trade values Murray far too highly. And if San Antonio is foolish enough to give up what could well be three lottery picks, two of them in excellent drafts, for Garland, Cleveland happily takes that haul and cuts Atlanta out.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,836
And1: 35,919
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#3 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jun 25, 2024 12:12 am

Ingram has to decide whether he's going to insist on a vet max extension, and if he will, he's unlikely to be the centerpiece of a Garland trade. If he'll come down and a deal gets done, I suspect the Pelicans just take Garland.

But you have the Spurs offering a package for Garland they wouldn't offer for Murray and Atlanta still getting that return.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,344
And1: 4,265
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#4 » by pipfan » Tue Jun 25, 2024 5:38 am

jbk1234 wrote:Ingram has to decide whether he's going to insist on a vet max extension, and if he will, he's unlikely to be the centerpiece of a Garland trade. If he'll come down and a deal gets done, I suspect the Pelicans just take Garland.

But you have the Spurs offering a package for Garland they wouldn't offer for Murray and Atlanta still getting that return.

I figure Garland is younger and a better PG type for Wemby. Murray was already in SA, and I'm assuming no reunion.

Maybe the swap stays in SA, and ATL gets cap relief, #8 and one pick back
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,087
And1: 5,567
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#5 » by One_and_Done » Tue Jun 25, 2024 6:57 am

Spurs paying way too much.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Presser
Ballboy
Posts: 34
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 24, 2024

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#6 » by Presser » Tue Jun 25, 2024 7:02 am

I fee like this is over complicated. Why not just do Garland for Ingram straight up, why make it a 4 team deal
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,344
And1: 4,265
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#7 » by pipfan » Tue Jun 25, 2024 10:51 am

Presser wrote:I fee like this is over complicated. Why not just do Garland for Ingram straight up, why make it a 4 team deal

Good question
I figure Murray is a better fit on defense than CJ. Tough to run CJ/Garland as your backcourt

SA could use a real, young PG-and Garland fits there
tidho
General Manager
Posts: 9,621
And1: 3,161
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Atl-SA-Clev-NO 

Post#8 » by tidho » Tue Jun 25, 2024 12:12 pm

Presser wrote:I fee like this is over complicated. Why not just do Garland for Ingram straight up, why make it a 4 team deal

CLE fans are hung up on Ingram's contract. Team's going to be over regardless, so I'm not sure it matters. Somehow if he takes $4M less than max though, everybody jumps on board.

Return to Trades and Transactions