NoDopeOnSundays wrote:blueNorange wrote:so hello brooklyn is in 2 different threads trying to pour cold water on the knicks
darn
He and Karate Diop are like a Kuzma / Poole level duo
more like nets pierce and garnett
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:blueNorange wrote:so hello brooklyn is in 2 different threads trying to pour cold water on the knicks
darn
He and Karate Diop are like a Kuzma / Poole level duo
TheNewEra wrote:Doc is just really bad at adapting but maybe they get a underdog boost.Hello Brooklyn wrote:TheNewEra wrote:
Bucks have Doc Rivers as the head coach the title window is closed until he’s fired.
Well I'm just saying they can beat the Knicks
Just can’t see it. Already concerns with Middleton and Lopez while each year Dame is a risk for a large drop off.
omerome wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:iLLmatic860 wrote:Lmaoo dudes just be talking out they ass on the gb. Say **** without doing simple search
Og is one of the few guys in the league that can contain Giannis
One stupid Youtube clip means OG can guard Giannis????![]()
Now I've heard it all. I hope you guys go with that strategy.
Also funny how you assume OG is coming back to the Knicks.
What if he goes to Philly for a bigger role?
Don't count your eggs before they hatch.
A bigger role in Philly playing behind Embiid and Maxey? So he'd still have a similar role like he was in TOR or he can be the 3rd/4th interchangeable option on the Knicks - a team he is already familiar with.
The choice is ultimately up to him, but he would have a great thing in NY. Him and Bridges would cause a lot of havoc defensively against other teams.
Hello Brooklyn wrote:omerome wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:
One stupid Youtube clip means OG can guard Giannis????![]()
Now I've heard it all. I hope you guys go with that strategy.
Also funny how you assume OG is coming back to the Knicks.
What if he goes to Philly for a bigger role?
Don't count your eggs before they hatch.
A bigger role in Philly playing behind Embiid and Maxey? So he'd still have a similar role like he was in TOR or he can be the 3rd/4th interchangeable option on the Knicks - a team he is already familiar with.
The choice is ultimately up to him, but he would have a great thing in NY. Him and Bridges would cause a lot of havoc defensively against other teams.
3rd option on Philly v 4th option in NYC. Not saying it will happen.
But its possible. Isn't it?
Bridges/OG/Randle sounds like a very crowded front court.
omerome wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:omerome wrote:A bigger role in Philly playing behind Embiid and Maxey? So he'd still have a similar role like he was in TOR or he can be the 3rd/4th interchangeable option on the Knicks - a team he is already familiar with.
The choice is ultimately up to him, but he would have a great thing in NY. Him and Bridges would cause a lot of havoc defensively against other teams.
3rd option on Philly v 4th option in NYC. Not saying it will happen.
But its possible. Isn't it?
Bridges/OG/Randle sounds like a very crowded front court.
Which is why - especially in this age of position less basketball, you can play Bridges, OG, and Randle together as your 2, 3, and 4.
Bridges would do so much more defensively than what Divo did as the 2 and he still can make plays for himself or creating passing lanes for Brunson and others. This will also open up the floor for OG as teams can't cheat on anyone and when the ball swings, he's either open to shoot or he can take it to the basket.
Hello Brooklyn wrote:iLLmatic860 wrote:
Lmaoo dudes just be talking out they ass on the gb. Say **** without doing simple search
Og is one of the few guys in the league that can contain Giannis
One stupid Youtube clip means OG can guard Giannis????![]()
Now I've heard it all. I hope you guys go with that strategy.
Also funny how you assume OG is coming back to the Knicks.
What if he goes to Philly for a bigger role?
Don't count your eggs before they hatch.
ccvle wrote:knicks were at their best when they keep missing shots and getting offensive rebounds.
Hello Brooklyn wrote:omerome wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:
3rd option on Philly v 4th option in NYC. Not saying it will happen.
But its possible. Isn't it?
Bridges/OG/Randle sounds like a very crowded front court.
Which is why - especially in this age of position less basketball, you can play Bridges, OG, and Randle together as your 2, 3, and 4.
Bridges would do so much more defensively than what Divo did as the 2 and he still can make plays for himself or creating passing lanes for Brunson and others. This will also open up the floor for OG as teams can't cheat on anyone and when the ball swings, he's either open to shoot or he can take it to the basket.
Look it could work. I'm just saying he might want to leave.
Especially if they offer him more money. Don't assume its locked up.
If I'm the Sixers I'd love to take OG away from the Knicks.
hugepatsfan wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:___Rand___ wrote:
You give Bridges too much credit. He's not a 2. He's a 3.
I'd be inclined to agree, although he's a pretty nice stretch between the two positions. In this age of "position-less" basketball, attaching him to one over another doesn't really do his versatility much justice.
I don't think he means 2 as in SG and 3 as SF. He means 2 as in #2 option and 3 as in #3 option.
GreatWhiteStiff wrote:ryguy613 wrote:Lots of talent, but not sure they have that ONE guy. Theres only been one 2004 Pistons. I like Brunson but I would still contend hes a 2. Also like Bridges but... I would also contend hes a 2. We will see if they can make it all work without a true super star.
How much of a superstar did the Boston Celtics have in the most recent nba playoff?
omerome wrote:ryguy613 wrote:Lots of talent, but not sure they have that ONE guy. Theres only been one 2004 Pistons. I like Brunson but I would still contend hes a 2. Also like Bridges but... I would also contend hes a 2. We will see if they can make it all work without a true super star.
I didn't know Becky Hammond had an account here.
iLLmatic860 wrote:ccvle wrote:knicks were at their best when they keep missing shots and getting offensive rebounds.
Actually one simple search will show you when they actually were at “their best”
?s=46&t=tVloFuZHnRcV_n-C8CiW9Q
___Rand___ wrote:hugepatsfan wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:
I'd be inclined to agree, although he's a pretty nice stretch between the two positions. In this age of "position-less" basketball, attaching him to one over another doesn't really do his versatility much justice.
I don't think he means 2 as in SG and 3 as SF. He means 2 as in #2 option and 3 as in #3 option.
You got it dude. That's what I meant. Bridges is a 3rd option.
___Rand___ wrote:ryguy613 wrote: Lots of talent, but not sure they have that ONE guy. Theres only been one 2004 Pistons. I like Brunson but I would still contend hes a 2. Also like Bridges but... I would also contend hes a 2. We will see if they can make it all work without a true super star.
You give Bridges too much credit. He's not a 2. He's a 3.