three3d wrote:Anyone know if Weltman has woke from his mid-morning nap yet? Time to clock in and get to work !!
Surely he won't be napping until after he does his yearly duty of giving away our 2nd round pick.
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
three3d wrote:Anyone know if Weltman has woke from his mid-morning nap yet? Time to clock in and get to work !!
jonbob17 wrote:I just looked at some random top 50 list and 16 of the top 50 are 22 years or older. It’s a weird draft.
Cammo101 wrote:three3d wrote:Anyone know if Weltman has woke from his mid-morning nap yet? Time to clock in and get to work !!
Surely he won't be napping until after he does his yearly duty of giving away our 2nd round pick.
MagicMatic wrote:RichCollab wrote:Knightro wrote:
I do agree that Carrington is a project, but he feels like a much different kind of prospect than Black.
Why is he a better prospect?
Just a different prospect. He can shoot and create offense in a pick and roll.
He's just raw in every other aspect and obviously doesnt have the defense or versatility Black does.

What does your friend think?Black and Blue wrote:Watching all this game film makes me cringe at remembering AB's college game film from a year ago. I just couldn't see anything to be excited about in that footage. This is a "worse" draft, with far more question marks, and yet I see a lot to be encouraged about in some of these prospects. -Including Carrington.
I've never wanted to be proven wrong more than with Anthony Black. If we hit on that pick it would change so much in a positive way. It would also mean our development team may be the best in the NBA, because there was so, so, SO much to work on with his college play. I can't help but feel like last year is this giant experiment of "how far can we push two guys who have very little in the way of skills, but have great measurables and are smart as hell."
eyriq wrote:What does your friend think?Black and Blue wrote:Watching all this game film makes me cringe at remembering AB's college game film from a year ago. I just couldn't see anything to be excited about in that footage. This is a "worse" draft, with far more question marks, and yet I see a lot to be encouraged about in some of these prospects. -Including Carrington.
I've never wanted to be proven wrong more than with Anthony Black. If we hit on that pick it would change so much in a positive way. It would also mean our development team may be the best in the NBA, because there was so, so, SO much to work on with his college play. I can't help but feel like last year is this giant experiment of "how far can we push two guys who have very little in the way of skills, but have great measurables and are smart as hell."
If we're moving up for Topic I think it would be worth it.jonbob17 wrote:Sam Vecenie suggested today on his podcast that the Bulls might be looking to trade back from 11, and it sounded like18/Orlando might a good landing spot for the Bulls to still get the guy they want(Shannon).
If the Magic really like someone surely to be gone at 18 would you package that Denver pick to move up in this draft, or are we better off holding on to the Denver pick for a potential trade?
Feel like Carter could help us out this year, while guys available at 18 are probably more future rotation guys.

Makes sense. 4:3 assist to turnover ratio in college screams court vision but inexperience. That was in a playmaker role but obviously he shared the court with other playmakers.Black and Blue wrote:eyriq wrote:What does your friend think?Black and Blue wrote:Watching all this game film makes me cringe at remembering AB's college game film from a year ago. I just couldn't see anything to be excited about in that footage. This is a "worse" draft, with far more question marks, and yet I see a lot to be encouraged about in some of these prospects. -Including Carrington.
I've never wanted to be proven wrong more than with Anthony Black. If we hit on that pick it would change so much in a positive way. It would also mean our development team may be the best in the NBA, because there was so, so, SO much to work on with his college play. I can't help but feel like last year is this giant experiment of "how far can we push two guys who have very little in the way of skills, but have great measurables and are smart as hell."
Basically the same thing, that AB had a surprisingly decent showing his rookie year given where he was at, and if the team can continue to build him from scratch they have something special. It's going to take time though and everyone is gambling heavily on capitalizing on AB's measurables.
For me when AB was drafted, I was like, "What is everyone so excited with this guy? I just don't see it." My friend and the other NBA scouts who know more than I do simply said, "Nothing is going to pop out in that game film because this kid still doesn't really know how to play. You draft him and hope the team can essentially teach him how to play and mold him into something over the coming years from the ground up."
I'm an impatient Magic fan, so a multi-year project where they had to teach a kid how to play was the last thing I wanted to hear about. -Especially when there have been so many failed projects over the years. But after year 1 I'm way more optimistic and can now see a path to him contributing consistently at some point, which is positive given how high his ceiling is.
CocoaFan wrote:If we're moving up for Topic I think it would be worth it.jonbob17 wrote:Sam Vecenie suggested today on his podcast that the Bulls might be looking to trade back from 11, and it sounded like18/Orlando might a good landing spot for the Bulls to still get the guy they want(Shannon).
If the Magic really like someone surely to be gone at 18 would you package that Denver pick to move up in this draft, or are we better off holding on to the Denver pick for a potential trade?
Feel like Carter could help us out this year, while guys available at 18 are probably more future rotation guys.

Def Swami wrote:This is the least invested I’ve been in a draft since Daniel Orton and Deandre Liggins in 2010 and 2011.

eyriq wrote:Makes sense. 4:3 assist to turnover ratio in college screams court vision but inexperience. That was in a playmaker role but obviously he shared the court with other playmakers.Black and Blue wrote:eyriq wrote:What does your friend think?
Basically the same thing, that AB had a surprisingly decent showing his rookie year given where he was at, and if the team can continue to build him from scratch they have something special. It's going to take time though and everyone is gambling heavily on capitalizing on AB's measurables.
For me when AB was drafted, I was like, "What is everyone so excited with this guy? I just don't see it." My friend and the other NBA scouts who know more than I do simply said, "Nothing is going to pop out in that game film because this kid still doesn't really know how to play. You draft him and hope the team can essentially teach him how to play and mold him into something over the coming years from the ground up."
I'm an impatient Magic fan, so a multi-year project where they had to teach a kid how to play was the last thing I wanted to hear about. -Especially when there have been so many failed projects over the years. But after year 1 I'm way more optimistic and can now see a path to him contributing consistently at some point, which is positive given how high his ceiling is.
His free throw rate, off-ball movement, size, and defense in college was ridiculously good, and that translated right away.
Shooting 39% from three as a rookie was shocking.
Mosley coached to AB's strengths. Playmaking wasn't touched, nor was any isolation ball. It was all connector piece and defense as a rookie. Which was still very good for us and why he contributed to winning.
I honestly don't get why he doesn't pass the eye test.
Knightro wrote:I would absolutely trade 18 + the 2025 Denver pick to get Devin Carter. I think he's a real stud.
Skybox wrote:I'm really liking McCain...and not in a G-League for a year kind of way. I hope he's there and I'd add DEN 25 to make sure we got him.
IF Topic were to drop to #18...absolutely, but I prefer McCain's shooting and healthy
There's a bunch of guys in our range that I'd be into...here's the few I'm not into (but, admittedly, could get behind):
KyShawn George
Zach Edey
Pacome Didiet
Johnny Furphy (I guess...)
Filipowski
Tyler Smith
Ryan Dunn (PLEASE not another 100% defender, no offensive game)
Skybox wrote:I'm really liking McCain...and not in a G-League for a year kind of way. I hope he's there and I'd add DEN 25 to make sure we got him.
IF Topic were to drop to #18...absolutely, but I prefer McCain's shooting and healthy
There's a bunch of guys in our range that I'd be into...here's the few I'm not into (but, admittedly, could get behind):
KyShawn George
Zach Edey
Pacome Didiet
Johnny Furphy (I guess...)
Filipowski
Tyler Smith
Ryan Dunn (PLEASE not another 100% defender, no offensive game)