Tim Lehrbach wrote:BlazersBroncos wrote:This is a fantastic trade for us.
Deni will be entering his year 23 season so he is basically the same age as Dalton. He is able to defend 2-4 at a near elite level and is able to hold his own when switched to a 1 or 5. He is on a deal that is likely the best value contract in the NBA and it’s declining (15.6 / 14.3 / 13.1 / 11.8).
After the AS break he managed 17 / 9 / 4 on 60% TS. He plays the game the right way, creating for others without ball stopping. If his shot holds up he is going to be an All Star. As it stands, we have the second coming of Batum, but with more hustle and toughness.
He is absolutely a young core guy being about 2.5 years older than Sharpe, the same age as Dalton, a year older than Edey and the same age as Silva.
This kid is absolutely the best basketball player on the Blazers roster now.
The 2029 pick is my only worry, but I will need to see if any protections are on it. That being said, I would take Deni over anyone in this draft.
A core of Deni, Scoot, Sharpe and #7 is exciting. Will have 34 and 40 to play with as well.
Additionally, hopefully this means Grant is gone.
I am just about here myself. I understand why others are hesitant about the 2029 pick (two of the three teams whose picks Portland owns could definitely suck) and investing in a good player now instead of continuing to stockpile future assets...
...I just don't share those views. Deni is just as valuable in trade (by definition) as what they gave up -- probably more so, since he also has a contract attached, meaning the Blazers give up less for matching salaries in a hypothetical trade for a star. He's a win-now, win-later, OR trade-later piece. This is more than can be said with any degree of certainty about the first rounders surrendered.
As for Batum, I think he's potentially better. Nic was (is?) a good player, but he wasted one of the quickest, sweetest strokes in the NBA by wanting to be a playmaker/connector type instead of a dynamic off-ball scorer/secondary guy. And, even as the on-ball guy he was in his brief peak, he was still passive. I think he was overrated in the role he played and underrated for the role he wouldn't play.
But that's an aside. Deni is not Batum and seems to have more aggression to him at both ends. I trust he'll continue to grow as a scorer. Good player, good deal.
I'm happy to have dissenting views to mine on this. I really hope you all are right and I'm wrong, genuinely so but I'll forever be skeptical of guys having good stats on bad teams.






















