ImageImageImage

2024 Free Agency

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#141 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:15 pm

winforlose wrote:I cannot see a scenario in which Monte Morris is not a Timberwolf.


I can. Especially with TC coming out and saying he expects Dillingham to play this year.

If Monte sees the writing on the wall that he's likely to spend a lot of the year as the 3rd string PG, he's probably going to want to go somewhere that he can jumpstart his career.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,652
And1: 5,166
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#142 » by minimus » Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:28 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:I cannot see a scenario in which Monte Morris is not a Timberwolf.


I can. Especially with TC coming out and saying he expects Dillingham to play this year.

If Monte sees the writing on the wall that he's likely to spend a lot of the year as the 3rd string PG, he's probably going to want to go somewhere that he can jumpstart his career.

Yeah, it's a tough decision for Monte. He knows what it means to play for rebuilding teams such as WAS and DET. He finally came to winning team and after a few months GM drafted a young guy on the same PG position
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,097
And1: 5,721
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#143 » by winforlose » Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:29 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:I cannot see a scenario in which Monte Morris is not a Timberwolf.


I can. Especially with TC coming out and saying he expects Dillingham to play this year.

If Monte sees the writing on the wall that he's likely to spend a lot of the year as the 3rd string PG, he's probably going to want to go somewhere that he can jumpstart his career.


Again, Monte had a down year, would lose his bird rights, and would be leaving a contender with a great culture. I think he signs with us, gets minutes until at least February, and then if he wants to move on TC makes it happen. Unless ownership comes to TC and says we don’t want to sign players for more than X (even to trade them later,) and Monte is a more than X player, I think Monte is back for at least preseason through February. I wonder if the same is true of Kyle, who the Wolves are rumored to be worried about losing in free agency.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,368
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#144 » by Norseman79 » Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:30 pm

If we are doing vet minimum PG, I like Smith Jr, Dunn, etc over Monte
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#145 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:50 pm

minimus wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:I cannot see a scenario in which Monte Morris is not a Timberwolf.


I can. Especially with TC coming out and saying he expects Dillingham to play this year.

If Monte sees the writing on the wall that he's likely to spend a lot of the year as the 3rd string PG, he's probably going to want to go somewhere that he can jumpstart his career.

Yeah, it's a tough decision for Monte. He knows what it means to play for rebuilding teams such as WAS and DET. He finally came to winning team and after a few months GM drafted a young guy on the same PG position


If he's going to play for the minimum for us, I bet there are multiple contenders that would pay him at least that to be their actual 2nd PG.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#146 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:57 pm

winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:I cannot see a scenario in which Monte Morris is not a Timberwolf.


I can. Especially with TC coming out and saying he expects Dillingham to play this year.

If Monte sees the writing on the wall that he's likely to spend a lot of the year as the 3rd string PG, he's probably going to want to go somewhere that he can jumpstart his career.


Again, Monte had a down year, would lose his bird rights, and would be leaving a contender with a great culture. I think he signs with us, gets minutes until at least February, and then if he wants to move on TC makes it happen. Unless ownership comes to TC and says we don’t want to sign players for more than X (even to trade them later,) and Monte is a more than X player, I think Monte is back for at least preseason through February. I wonder if the same is true of Kyle, who the Wolves are rumored to be worried about losing in free agency.


Or he can, like many players do, sign a "prove it" contract at a place where he can show who he is as a player. And if he plays well enough, someone will give him a partial MLE-type deal. He's likely never going to see 9M/year again in the current landscape, but if he plays like the Monte of old, he can probably get 4-6. If he stays buried on our bench, he's going to keep getting vet minimum deals.

And while he does have a very good relationship with TC, do we know if Finch feels the same way? He played a decent amount he final 2 months of the season and then was essentially out of the Playoff rotation. And there were times we were absolutely dying for better PG play.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,351
And1: 19,379
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#147 » by shrink » Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:24 pm

The key to whether we can bring back Morris and Anderson may depend on whether we can get them to sign a market-friendly deal, and whether we the organization is ruthlessly willing to trade guys off our contending team in February if the owners have a limit on how much luxury tax they are willing to pay.

The key here is that lux taxes are determined by a team’s roster on the final day of the regular season. If we signed SloMo for $6 mil, it may incrementally cost owners $20 with lux taxes (not checking the numbers here), so $6 mil is supposed to make us not sign him. However, if we traded him, SloMo on a $6 mil deal only costs most other teams $6 mil, and they would likely trade him for a TPE (or now the MLE), and likely get a few second rounders as well. In the meantime, he could help the team accumulate regular season wins.

To me, the most MIN should offer Anderson is $5,183,000, which is the full tax-payer MLE. Rule changes a few years back forced teams to start the year at the cap minimum, so teams no longer roll into the season with a lot of cap space, but most will have TPEs and often unused parts of their MLE for trade deadline maneuvers.

Any deal that is under the market price is a potential trade asset, and loading up as many of our 15 roster spots with these type of deals maximizes the value of those 15 slots, in regular season wins and trade value. The key though is that some of those deals need to be traded by the deadline, like hot potatoes, because no owner is likely willing to pay unlimited luxury taxes.
DaMplsKid
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 158
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
       

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#148 » by DaMplsKid » Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:28 pm

After the draft Kyle is the only FA we have that I think we might bring back now but he would have to be willing to take a pay cut which might not happen.

If we cant bring him back I would like to see us go after a Saddiq Bey. ( I could see him going to NYK to join the rest of Villanova) He's game is underrated and he bring the size to play the 3/4 in multiple lines up. He shouldn't cost a ton and bring a veteran type with all the rookies/younger (unproven) guy off the bench. Not a sexy move but good depth.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#149 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:30 pm

shrink wrote:The key to whether we can bring back Morris and Anderson may depend on whether we can get the, to sign a market-friendly deal, and whether we the organization is ruthlessly willing to trade guys off our contending team in February if the owners have a limit on how much luxury tax they are willing to pay.

The key here is that lux taxes are determined by a team’s roster on the final day of the regular season. If we signed SloMo for $6 mil, it may costs us $20 (not checking the numbers here), so $6 mil is supposed to make us not sign him. However, if we traded him, SloMo on a $6 mil deal only costs most other teams $6 mil, and they would likely trade him for a TPE (or now the MLE), and likely get a few second rounders as well. In the meantime, he could help the team accumulate regular season wins.

To me, the most MIN should offer Anderson is $5,183,000, which is the full tax-payer MLE. Rule changes a few years back forced teams to start the year at the cap minimum, so teams no longer roll into the season with a lot of cap space, but most will have TPEs and often unused parts of their MLE for trade deadline maneuvers.

Any deal that is under the market price is a potential asset, and loading up as many of our 15 roster spots with these type of deals maximizes the value of those 15 slots, in regular season wins and trade value. The key though is that some of those deals need to be traded by the deadline, like hot potatoes, because no owner is likely willing to pay unlimited luxury taxes.


That might even be a little low. The 8 pick last year started his contract at 6.2M, so Dillingham should be a little more than that. And (I believe it was) Marks posted that drafting RD was going to cost us 28M next year.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,351
And1: 19,379
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#150 » by shrink » Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:45 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:That might even be a little low. The 8 pick last year started his contract at 6.2M, so Dillingham should be a little more than that. And (I believe it was) Marks posted that drafting RD was going to cost us 28M next year.

You’re right. My point was to show the flaw in the rule. SloMo isn’t worth either $20 or $28 incrementally to us. But he doesn’t cost that if we trade him for space/exception before they actually assess the lux tax.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,699
And1: 3,396
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#151 » by BlacJacMac » Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:58 pm

shrink wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:That might even be a little low. The 8 pick last year started his contract at 6.2M, so Dillingham should be a little more than that. And (I believe it was) Marks posted that drafting RD was going to cost us 28M next year.

You’re right. My point was to show the flaw in the rule. SloMo isn’t worth either $20 or $28 incrementally to us. But he doesn’t cost that if we trade him for space/exception before they actually assess the lux tax.


I get that for sure. And its a good plan.

But not without dangers. If KA rediscovers his shot and is suddenly our 7th man and a vital cog, do you still move him (and risk a huge blow to chemistry/morale), or eat ~30M more dollars to keep him?

Conversely, if he falls on his face, do you actually have to give up something of value at the deadline to clear his contract?

I think its a really scary game to play.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,351
And1: 19,379
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#152 » by shrink » Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:01 pm

So younggunsmn touched on this last night, but I was curious how many roster spots we had left after adding two first round picks.

Right now, we have 11 under contract for next year ($186). 7 rotation, WMJ $2.5, Miller $1.9, Dillingham $6.3, Shannon $2.6

12 if we pick up Josh Minott’s non-guaranteed $2 mil team option

Jaylen Clark is on a two way.

So we have 3/4 roster spots and 2 two-ways left for Anderson, Morris, MacLaughlin, Garza, Warren, #37, Nix, Vet Min FAs
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,019
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#153 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:16 pm

Interestingly, I think Kyle would be great to have in the second unit with Rob now. I really like that pairing.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,652
And1: 5,166
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#154 » by minimus » Thu Jun 27, 2024 6:14 pm

Does Moore trade means that at least one of Morris, Anderson will be resigned?
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#155 » by Neeva » Thu Jun 27, 2024 6:18 pm

8 hope we resign both tbh. I wanna see Morris when he is healthier.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,447
And1: 12,320
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#156 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jun 27, 2024 6:20 pm

Neeva wrote:8 hope we resign both tbh. I wanna see Morris when he is healthier.


How much playing time does he get with Dillingham here though? I'd be happy if he's willing to come here and compete for the 2nd string PG position, but I think it's possible he'll prefer to go somewhere with guaranteed playing time.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#157 » by Neeva » Thu Jun 27, 2024 6:23 pm

We gotta rest Mike more next season, he’s a hundred years old.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,756
And1: 2,588
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#158 » by younggunsmn » Fri Jun 28, 2024 4:24 am

PG (2)
Conley, Dillingham

Wing (5)
Edwards, McDaniels, Alexander-Walker, Shannon, Minott

Big (4)
KAT, Gobert, Reid, Miller

that's 11 roster spots filled with 3 available, all will probably be filled with vet minimums.

You've got 9 rotation spots taken with Miller and Minott spending more time in the G-League,
and Shannon and NAW fighting for the same minutes.
Dillingham's draft status guarantees him some minutes, but Finch is also going to need a much more seasoned option to backup Conley or start if he gets hurt.

Free Agents:
McLaughlin
Morris
Anderson
Garza (restricted)
TJ Warren.

I'd look to fill the final 3 roster spots with 2 capable guards and one player who can play the 4 or 5.
McLaughlin would be a logical choice to come back, and whether Anderson is back depends on if he will accept the vet minimum.
Also a shot Garza is back.
I don't see Monte Morris coming back for either the reduced role or the money we would be willing to offer.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,652
And1: 5,166
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#159 » by minimus » Fri Jun 28, 2024 1:46 pm

I think it will be a very unique bench group if we combine Reid/Towns-Anderson-Shannon-NAW/Edwards-Dilly. Here is why: both Shannon and Dilly could use help in learning defense and playmaking nuances, Anderson might be the best on court mentor for them. On other hand Shannon with his physicality and ability to run can help bench unit scoring easy points in transition (MIN was one of the worst in fastbreak points last season), while Dilly can help our offense with creativity and shot making. It is the easiest way to improve offense by increasing pace and 3pt makes.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 1,955
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: 2024 Free Agency 

Post#160 » by jpatrick » Fri Jun 28, 2024 2:07 pm

Anderson is obviously the priority over Morris but how much can we honestly pay? Same contract as Conley? More/less?

I don’t see Morris back unless he takes a one year vet minimum (or close to that) type deal, which he can get anywhere. And I’d guess if he’s taking that little, he’ll prefer somewhere with more playing time. If he declines, my guess is JMac is back on a minimum deal.

Any vet minimum FA speculation of guys we might target? I don’t see a lot of minutes available though.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves