ImageImageImage

Iowa Wolves/G League talk

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#981 » by winforlose » Mon Feb 5, 2024 4:31 pm

NebWolvesFan wrote:
winforlose wrote:
minimus wrote:


In that same game Leonard Miller dropped a triple double with 21/11/10 in 38 minutes. Minott shot 11-16 (only 1-4 from 3 so 10 of 12 from 2,) for 23 points on 23/4/6/1/1 in 37 minutes.

Regarding Cooke, we saw Nowell do stuff like like this when he was in the G. But the 3 didn’t translate to the NBA. It is hard to get minutes for Minott and Miller much less Cooke in the NBA. Though if we trade for a PG I would be fine waiving Nix and replacing him with Cooke as a two way.


It's very possible that if Minnesota makes a 2-for-1 or 3-for-2 trade that Clark gets the 14th rosters spot. It makes sense with him potentially returning from injury and having less than a year of NBA experience. He would be extremely cheap. If Clark goes to a traditional contract a two-way would open.


Clarke is a on a two way next year and then we can get JJ on a 4 year Hinkie special (Naz Reid contract.) There is no way we blow two cheap years and start the clock running now. Sooner promote Cooke to the roster than Clarke
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#982 » by Klomp » Mon Feb 5, 2024 7:28 pm

winforlose wrote:Clarke is a on a two way next year and then we can get JJ on a 4 year Hinkie special (Naz Reid contract.) There is no way we blow two cheap years and start the clock running now. Sooner promote Cooke to the roster than Clarke

Naz Reid was already on a two-way deal when they bumped him up to that contract. Better to give it to someone who's already been in the Minnesota system than someone who has never stepped foot up here.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#983 » by winforlose » Mon Feb 5, 2024 7:34 pm

Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:Clarke is a on a two way next year and then we can get JJ on a 4 year Hinkie special (Naz Reid contract.) There is no way we blow two cheap years and start the clock running now. Sooner promote Cooke to the roster than Clarke

Naz Reid was already on a two-way deal when they bumped him up to that contract. Better to give it to someone who's already been in the Minnesota system than someone who has never stepped foot up here.


If you give it to Clarke you accelerate a process you don’t want to accelerate and cost yourself money or control later. If it has to be someone Nix or Garza are both better.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#984 » by Klomp » Mon Feb 5, 2024 7:41 pm

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:Clarke is a on a two way next year and then we can get JJ on a 4 year Hinkie special (Naz Reid contract.) There is no way we blow two cheap years and start the clock running now. Sooner promote Cooke to the roster than Clarke

Naz Reid was already on a two-way deal when they bumped him up to that contract. Better to give it to someone who's already been in the Minnesota system than someone who has never stepped foot up here.


If you give it to Clarke you accelerate a process you don’t want to accelerate and cost yourself money or control later. If it has to be someone Nix or Garza are both better.

Minimums are tied to years of service. Clark is a rookie. Nix and Garza are not. You'd be paying more now, which could accelerate things even more.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,672
And1: 3,356
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#985 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 5, 2024 7:50 pm

Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:Clarke is a on a two way next year and then we can get JJ on a 4 year Hinkie special (Naz Reid contract.) There is no way we blow two cheap years and start the clock running now. Sooner promote Cooke to the roster than Clarke

Naz Reid was already on a two-way deal when they bumped him up to that contract. Better to give it to someone who's already been in the Minnesota system than someone who has never stepped foot up here.


There is no way I convert Clarke to a real contract until I have some kind of idea if he's even an NBA player. And my guess is he's unlikely to ever play meaningful NBA minutes.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#986 » by Klomp » Mon Feb 5, 2024 8:27 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:There is no way I convert Clarke to a real contract until I have some kind of idea if he's even an NBA player. And my guess is he's unlikely to ever play meaningful NBA minutes.

Do you know that Josh Minott is an NBA player?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#987 » by winforlose » Mon Feb 5, 2024 8:40 pm

Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:Naz Reid was already on a two-way deal when they bumped him up to that contract. Better to give it to someone who's already been in the Minnesota system than someone who has never stepped foot up here.


If you give it to Clarke you accelerate a process you don’t want to accelerate and cost yourself money or control later. If it has to be someone Nix or Garza are both better.

Minimums are tied to years of service. Clark is a rookie. Nix and Garza are not. You'd be paying more now, which could accelerate things even more.


If that small amount of pro rated difference actually is the key to staying under the tax then convert someone not named Clarke (literally anyone.) By keeping Clarke a 2 way you get more long term value. You lose nothing by converting Cooke on a Hinkie special and moving him later. The roster spot isn’t valuable at that point, and you can make his very low salary non guaranteed every year.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,672
And1: 3,356
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#988 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 5, 2024 8:40 pm

Klomp wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:There is no way I convert Clarke to a real contract until I have some kind of idea if he's even an NBA player. And my guess is he's unlikely to ever play meaningful NBA minutes.

Do you know that Josh Minott is an NBA player?


Nope. But we have a much larger sample size of actually seeing him between the G League and NBA.

Clarke was a disaster on offense in 3 years of college. I doubt he's playable unless his defense is historically good.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,687
And1: 6,144
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#989 » by KGdaBom » Thu Feb 22, 2024 12:05 am

The Toronto Raptors have agreed to sign DJ Carton to a 10-day contract.

Carton has averaged 18.6 points and 5.7 assists for the Iowa Energy this season.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,606
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#990 » by minimus » Thu Jun 27, 2024 11:55 pm

Read on Twitter


It looks like we found a bigman for our g-league annual project

Read on Twitter

I guess Nix, Minott and Clark are back

Read on Twitter

This, so underrated part of g-league development

To sum, up:

I hope that Jesse Edwards and Daishen Nix will form C-PG ace that will allow our g-league team to run an organised basketball. Last season Iowa games often were really unwatchable: no defense, no idea in offense and defense. And as much as I love Garza, I'd prefer a two-way bigman that is available in EVERY g-league game. I dont care if Jesse Edwards does not have upside and any chance to make NBA: just set good, screens, rebound, block and be part of team offense and defense.

Also we need shooter and 3&D guys for our g-league. Clark is one of them, I'd bring back Tyrese Martin, and give as much as needed opportunities to Miller. So run Edwards -Miller-Martin-Clark-Nix lineup to create some team chemistry
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,606
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#991 » by minimus » Fri Jun 28, 2024 12:00 am

Klomp wrote:Seems like the "Iowa Gobert"

From Vecenie (ranked him 70th):
It’s very difficult to find players this big who are also this athletic. Edwards measured in at 6-11 1/2 without shoes at the combine with a 7-5 wingspan. That gives him an enormous 9-3 standing reach. On top of that, he tested among the best 7-footers ever. He had a 35.5-inch vertical leap and tested solidly for a big man in the lane agility drill.



Yeah! Give Miller and Clark and others some repetitions how to throw a perfect lob pass to Gobert!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#992 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 9, 2024 8:29 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
DaMplsKid
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 158
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
       

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#993 » by DaMplsKid » Wed Jul 10, 2024 4:43 pm

Wonder what the starting line up will be? Do they do hockey subs 5 in 5 out type? Are they gonna make the two 1st rnd pick come off the bench?

These are the questions I am wondering heading into Fridays games. Don't really care about starting as long as everyone plays and Dilly is on the court when the game is on the line in the 4th.

Line up I want to see the most of is:

Dilly,
TSJ
Minot
Miller
Edwards
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#994 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 10, 2024 5:16 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#995 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 10, 2024 5:17 pm

DaMplsKid wrote:Wonder what the starting line up will be? Do they do hockey subs 5 in 5 out type? Are they gonna make the two 1st rnd pick come off the bench?

These are the questions I am wondering heading into Fridays games. Don't really care about starting as long as everyone plays and Dilly is on the court when the game is on the line in the 4th.

I think you're a little lost :wink:
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#996 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:12 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#997 » by winforlose » Thu Jul 11, 2024 5:08 am

Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Isn’t that illegal? He has been a two way for the past 3 seasons. Same reason we couldn’t sign Garza. I wonder if he really got spot 15?

Also couldn’t find it on hoopshype. Are we sure this is real?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,845
And1: 22,429
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#998 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 11, 2024 5:12 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Isn’t that illegal? He has been a two way for the past 3 seasons. Same reason we couldn’t sign Garza. I wonder if he really got spot 15?

Also couldn’t find it on hoopshype. Are we sure this is real?

Is this trustworthy enough for you?

https://www.nba.com/players/transactions
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,103
And1: 4,585
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#999 » by wolves_89 » Thu Jul 11, 2024 5:12 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Isn’t that illegal? He has been a two way for the past 3 seasons. Same reason we couldn’t sign Garza. I wonder if he really got spot 15?


Nix was on a regular contract with Houston for all of 2022-23, so technically he's only been on a two-way during 2 seasons.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Iowa Wolves/G League talk 

Post#1000 » by winforlose » Thu Jul 11, 2024 5:18 am

wolves_89 wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Isn’t that illegal? He has been a two way for the past 3 seasons. Same reason we couldn’t sign Garza. I wonder if he really got spot 15?


Nix was on a regular contract with Houston for all of 2022-23, so technically he's only been on a two-way during 2 seasons.


So then the rule is 3 years a two way in first four years? I guess that makes sense. Gonna be honest, still a little confused by this from a rules standpoint, and from a logic standpoint, but at least we can cut him again later without a cap hit :).

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves