Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
Agreed. The only way we land the #1 pick is somehow being bad enough (while not really trying to be bad) to be in that sweet spot of odds AND then getting extremely lucky enough to have the ping pong balls go our way. So, not a very likely scenario.DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.

dawhizz wrote:DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
Isn’t the Bulls pick only top ten protected, otherwise it goes to the Spurs? That’s pretty good incentive to tank.

dawhizz wrote:DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
Isn’t the Bulls pick only top ten protected, otherwise it goes to the Spurs? That’s pretty good incentive to tank.
DuckIII wrote:dawhizz wrote:DuckIII wrote:
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
Isn’t the Bulls pick only top ten protected, otherwise it goes to the Spurs? That’s pretty good incentive to tank.
Don’t have to tank to be top 10. Hell, we were 11 this year and busted ass to win as much as possible.

fleet wrote:kodo wrote:Givony:Matas Buzelis is peaking at the right time
After missing the first three months of the G League season with ankle injuries, Buzelis was slow out of the gates but has been playing his best basketball of late. He's shooting 39% from 3 over his past 10 games, has transformed himself from being a poor defender to being extremely impactful on and off the ball, and is soaking up increased usage successfully with ball-dominant Ron Holland now sidelined for the season with a thumb injury.
Buzelis was on a major platform this past weekend at the Rising Stars game, where he was able to match up with Oklahoma City's Chet Holmgren, Charlotte's Brandon Miller and many other of the NBA's most talented young players. He showed his passing creativity, shot-making prowess, defensive playmaking instincts and all-around aggressiveness attacking opponents consistently -- even hitting a game-winning turnaround jumper to advance to the championship game.
Being able to showcase his tremendous size, improving frame and intriguing versatility on both ends of the floor was a major opportunity for Buzelis, something that will likely stick with the many NBA executives in attendance ahead of the pre-draft process.
Having weighed 185 pounds exactly a year ago, Buzelis is now at 205, which has unlocked some added explosiveness and an ability to initiate and play through contact more effectively on both ends of the floor. Buzelis is always looming as a weakside rim-protector and is doing a much better job of getting in a low stance, turning his hips and sliding his feet on the perimeter, staying down on fakes and showing impressive instincts staying attached to opponents.
His shot-creation prowess is something teams want to see him continue to make strides with, as he's been somewhat of a mixed bag operating out of pick-and-roll and in isolation, not always able to beat defenders cleanly off the bounce and finish what he creates, due to his lack of strength. Buzelis' jumper has been streaky -- he's 22-for-84 from 3 in 26 games -- but has been on an upward trajectory, showing clean mechanics, a high release and confidence with his shot-making prowess, something teams will be studying closely in the pre-draft process.
Buzelis was the original No. 1 prospect in our very first mock draft released one year ago, and he's putting himself back in that conversation with the way he's playing of late. He's got several more weeks to continue building momentum before his season comes to a close. He should continue to benefit from being a top offensive option for Ignite with Holland out. -- Jonathan Givony
If a valid scouting report, why does he drop to 11?

Mbrahv0528 wrote:Agreed. The only way we land the #1 pick is somehow being bad enough (while not really trying to be bad) to be in that sweet spot of odds AND then getting extremely lucky enough to have the ping pong balls go our way. So, not a very likely scenario.DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
Sent from my SM-S928U using RealGM mobile app

DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.

dougthonus wrote:DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
The good news is, that probably doesn't matter all that much. I know you are aware of this, but to re-iterate it, if you are the worst team in the league you are 50% picking 5th and 50% picking better than 5th. If we're the 7th worst team in the league our odds at #1 are 7.5% vs 14% for being the worst team. That's a big difference of course (almost 2x the chance) but you still have a reasonable shot at it by not being absolutely god awful.
WindyCityBorn wrote:drosestruts wrote:
This guy too?
Please tell me this is a joke and you don’t actually think this is reasonable or rational comparison?
League Circles wrote:The talk of tanking because we probably won't have Demar, and maybe not Zach or Vuc, is actually very funny because there's plenty of evidence that they were exactly what was holding us back. Like simply swapping Demar for Giddey is likely to improve us. Simply swapping some of Vuc's minutes for whoever the 2025 version of Tony Bradley will likely improve us more, etc. Zach didn't really play last year, so he's a moot point. Only real likely detriment is if we lose Williams. If we don't, he and Ayo can replace Caruso IMO.
drosestruts wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:
Please tell me this is a joke and you don’t actually think this is reasonable or rational comparison?
I think posting a 30-second video showing Matas making 4 three-pointers and saying "looks like he can be a 36% 3pt shooter" is absolutely meaningless, so I followed up with my own meaningless video.

WindyCityBorn wrote:OK fair enough how about the fact that he shot close 40 percent from 3 over his last 10 G-League games and he was a good shooter in high school. The tools are there and some glimpses of production.

dougthonus wrote:DuckIII wrote:Hold That wrote:Tanking for Cooper Flagg is the final piece.. get rid of everybody, gut it down to the studs.
Flagg and Matas would be interesting
We’re not really going to tank though. Not the way some teams are going to do it.
The good news is, that probably doesn't matter all that much. I know you are aware of this, but to re-iterate it, if you are the worst team in the league you are 50% picking 5th and 50% picking better than 5th. If we're the 7th worst team in the league our odds at #1 are 7.5% vs 14% for being the worst team. That's a big difference of course (almost 2x the chance) but you still have a reasonable shot at it by not being absolutely god awful.
Ice Man wrote:I'm not normally a tanker, nor for giving young players court time until they earn it, but next year I'd be fine with -
Giddey
Coby/Ayo
Somebody (Pat?)
Matas
Somebody
Take my lumps, see what I have, collect a high draft pick.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.