are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?!

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

KingofTheClay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 998
And1: 504
Joined: Dec 25, 2020
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#461 » by KingofTheClay » Fri Jun 28, 2024 4:34 pm

Can we think about this….

What happens if Tatum is thrusted onto the hospital Knicks in lieu of Brunson instead of hiding behind the Celtics 4 other all stars?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sweet Serenity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,725
And1: 2,640
Joined: Dec 01, 2023

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#462 » by Sweet Serenity » Fri Jun 28, 2024 7:39 pm

RHODEY wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
doogie_hauser wrote:
Not overall career body wise work of play he ain't
Not even convinced he is a better player then Jaylen Brown either.

Brunson I feel reached his optimal peak as a player last season, whereas The Jays still have plenty of growth and improvement left in him.

Calling him better than Tatum is absolutely laughable, especially given the post season CD/Credentials of the two players


So, Brunson peaked on a team that was 3 starters down and he was forced to play through double/triple teams every game? Brunson peaked in only his 2nd year as a full time 1st option while Tatum/Brown still have plenty of growth and improvement in them after 5 years of being the top 2 options on their team? :lol:

In 8 seasons, Jaylen Brown has never even peaked as high as Jalen Brunson. He’s not better than him. He’s in the same tier as Randle if anything. Brunson and Tatum is where the debate lies and both are top 10.

Brunson wins that debate too.


Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?
Sweet Serenity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,725
And1: 2,640
Joined: Dec 01, 2023

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#463 » by Sweet Serenity » Fri Jun 28, 2024 7:41 pm

KingofTheClay wrote:Can we think about this….

What happens if Tatum is thrusted onto the hospital Knicks in lieu of Brunson instead of hiding behind the Celtics 4 other all stars?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He takes them too the Comference Finals.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,098
And1: 22,645
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#464 » by RHODEY » Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:35 pm

Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
So, Brunson peaked on a team that was 3 starters down and he was forced to play through double/triple teams every game? Brunson peaked in only his 2nd year as a full time 1st option while Tatum/Brown still have plenty of growth and improvement in them after 5 years of being the top 2 options on their team? :lol:

In 8 seasons, Jaylen Brown has never even peaked as high as Jalen Brunson. He’s not better than him. He’s in the same tier as Randle if anything. Brunson and Tatum is where the debate lies and both are top 10.

Brunson wins that debate too.


Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?


I don't know, its a non sequitur comparison IMO . Jaylen Brown is a #2 option while Brunson is a number 1 option. If I believe Brunson is better than Tatum (i do) why would I even put Jaylen Brown in his stratosphere?
Sweet Serenity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,725
And1: 2,640
Joined: Dec 01, 2023

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#465 » by Sweet Serenity » Fri Jun 28, 2024 9:44 pm

RHODEY wrote:
Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Brunson wins that debate too.


Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?


I don't know, its a non sequitur comparison IMO . Jaylen Brown is a #2 option while Brunson is a number 1 option. If I believe Brunson is better than Tatum (i do) why would I even put Jaylen Brown in his stratosphere?


I’m not talking about Brown
bledredwine
RealGM
Posts: 14,647
And1: 5,782
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#466 » by bledredwine » Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:36 pm

Dez wrote:I don't believe so at the moment.

Defensively they'll be great but I don't rate Bridges offense enough to think that they still don't live and die by Brunson.


My thoughts exactly.
:o LeBron is 0-7 in game winning/tying FGs in the finals. And is 20/116 or 17% in game winning/tying FGs in the 4th/OT for his career. That's historically bad :o
bronxknicksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,507
And1: 2,313
Joined: Feb 01, 2011
     

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#467 » by bronxknicksfan1 » Fri Jun 28, 2024 11:38 pm

Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
So, Brunson peaked on a team that was 3 starters down and he was forced to play through double/triple teams every game? Brunson peaked in only his 2nd year as a full time 1st option while Tatum/Brown still have plenty of growth and improvement in them after 5 years of being the top 2 options on their team? :lol:

In 8 seasons, Jaylen Brown has never even peaked as high as Jalen Brunson. He’s not better than him. He’s in the same tier as Randle if anything. Brunson and Tatum is where the debate lies and both are top 10.

Brunson wins that debate too.


Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?


No. But Tatum was never in Curry’s stratosphere. I would’ve considered 2017 IT better than this version of Tatum.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,098
And1: 22,645
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#468 » by RHODEY » Fri Jun 28, 2024 11:45 pm

bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Brunson wins that debate too.


Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?


No. But Tatum was never in Curry’s stratosphere. I would’ve considered 2017 IT better than this version of Tatum.

Agreed. 2017 IT>2024 Tatum & Brown.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,098
And1: 22,645
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#469 » by RHODEY » Fri Jun 28, 2024 11:46 pm

Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Sweet Serenity wrote:
Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?


I don't know, its a non sequitur comparison IMO . Jaylen Brown is a #2 option while Brunson is a number 1 option. If I believe Brunson is better than Tatum (i do) why would I even put Jaylen Brown in his stratosphere?


I’m not talking about Brown

You comparing Tatum to Curry? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Sweet Serenity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,725
And1: 2,640
Joined: Dec 01, 2023

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#470 » by Sweet Serenity » Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:10 am

RHODEY wrote:
Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
I don't know, its a non sequitur comparison IMO . Jaylen Brown is a #2 option while Brunson is a number 1 option. If I believe Brunson is better than Tatum (i do) why would I even put Jaylen Brown in his stratosphere?


I’m not talking about Brown

You comparing Tatum to Curry? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Cmon mate you can’t be this simple ?

I’m making the point that Thomas had a better year than Curry in 2017 even though Curry had a better career up until that point & was still regarded as the better player.

I used that as an example for the Tatum/Brunson debate. You can make a case that Brunson had a better year but one year doesn’t put him over Tatum.
Sweet Serenity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,725
And1: 2,640
Joined: Dec 01, 2023

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#471 » by Sweet Serenity » Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:13 am

bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Brunson wins that debate too.


Isaiah Thomas statistically & on MVP votes was better than Curry in 2017.
Would’ve you considered Isaiah Thomas a better a basketball player than Steph Curry at the time ?


No. But Tatum was never in Curry’s stratosphere. I would’ve considered 2017 IT better than this version of Tatum.


IT has never been better than Tatum in his life
mattg
General Manager
Posts: 7,980
And1: 3,470
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#472 » by mattg » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:10 am

NYKat wrote:
What a garbage take.

The guys has done nothing but improve every single year he’s been in the league, (and has an MIP as evidence) to the extent that he’s a 2 time All NBA player, who spearheaded the resurgence of the Knicks franchise to the best team in 20 years.

Just say you don’t know what the f*ck you’re talking about and keep it moving.

This is just objectively false. Randle had an insane regression the season immediately after winning most improved player lol. Like what are we even talking about here with this nonsense of "improved every year"?

The Knicks have elevated because brought in Thibs who has instilled an identity, and for once their FO has targeted quality role players, made a few savvy trades, and one of the best FA signings ever in Brunson. And aside from Bogdanovic trade (which was just flipped into Bridges), all the other players targeted fit Thibs vision so their coaching staff/FA is obviously in lockstep. That's what has elevated them. Randle is along for the ride.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,246
And1: 497
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#473 » by JKiddy » Mon Jul 1, 2024 3:50 pm

Is there a way we can take bets that the Knicks will not win the title? Is there a way we can make this happen legit on here?
KingofTheClay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 998
And1: 504
Joined: Dec 25, 2020
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#474 » by KingofTheClay » Mon Jul 1, 2024 4:14 pm

If the Knicks get a decent big they’re probably favorites in the East.

Jalen Brunson is the best player in a hypothetical series and he actually has multiple scorers and versatile wings to work with this time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 66,753
And1: 61,641
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#475 » by Raps in 4 » Mon Jul 1, 2024 4:15 pm

Yes. I think a healthy Knicks could have challenged the Celtics this year. And they're going to be even better going into next season. Thibs just needs to learn to load manage his players during the regular season.
OrangeBlueSkies
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,964
And1: 3,144
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#476 » by OrangeBlueSkies » Fri Jul 19, 2024 4:08 am

Larry_Russell wrote:
OrangeBlueSkies wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
Because you were literally wrong



In two years (when role players who don't even touch OGs in talent) get 40 million/year like its nothing, because the way the salary cap will increase, OGs deal will be a steal. 40 million a season for a guy who impacts winning like OG does is market value.

Brunson/Bridges/OG/Randle/Robinson
Hart/DVo/McBride

you know you'll have a few players lining up to make minimum contracts to play on that team. Also, good luck scoring on that bunch.



Maybe.

Maybe not.

I dont see any scenario were a 3rd tier player will be getting paid 40+ Million. Expectations are that by the end of the decade the Cap COULD be around 200 million. Lets assume it makes it all the way to 200 million. It is currently 141 million for this upcoming season. (2024-25)

So lets just take a 60 mill increase over the next 5 seasons, or a flat increase of 12.5 million increase per season (which isnt how it will work) in 2 years we can just say the cap is at 166 (141 mill+12.5+12.5)

That puts OG at making around 25% of the cap. I think that many people would view that as an overpay for the

100th ranked PPG
160th ranked RPG
184th ranked apg
21st ranked spg
44th ranked ORating (starters with at least 25 games played)
Very good defender - No doubt there.
Good-great net rating

He is an ok but not great shooter
He isnt really a creator
He doest rebound great

Great man to man defender.

But I get why the Knicks needed to do it, you mortgaged the future to make this happen.



Dude, really? Quickley got 37.5 million a year bo. OG impacts winning.
Why didn’t you include win shares and stats of that nature? Did those numbers not fit your narrative or this biased picture you’re painting.

Knock off Picasso
User avatar
LakerLegend
RealGM
Posts: 13,472
And1: 7,753
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: SoCal

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#477 » by LakerLegend » Fri Jul 19, 2024 6:11 pm

People really think Brunson can lead a team past these Celtics?
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#478 » by cgf » Fri Jul 19, 2024 7:54 pm

LakerLegend wrote:People really think Brunson can lead a team past these Celtics?


Knicks - Celtics games have been wild since Thibs took over in general, but it really depends on health...cause I do like how we match up with them with Randle - Anunoby - Bridges + Robinson / Hart / DDV around Jalen.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
NY2k1
Veteran
Posts: 2,623
And1: 1,086
Joined: Dec 21, 2011

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#479 » by NY2k1 » Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:14 pm

LakerLegend wrote:People really think Brunson can lead a team past these Celtics?


Yes.

Brunson was the only reason the Knicks even had a puncher's chance against the Heat in last year's playoffs to start.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,098
And1: 22,645
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#480 » by RHODEY » Fri Jul 19, 2024 9:26 pm

Sweet Serenity wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Sweet Serenity wrote:
I’m not talking about Brown

You comparing Tatum to Curry? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Cmon mate you can’t be this simple ?

I’m making the point that Thomas had a better year than Curry in 2017 even though Curry had a better career up until that point & was still regarded as the better player.

I used that as an example for the Tatum/Brunson debate. You can make a case that Brunson had a better year but one year doesn’t put him over Tatum.

Cmon mate..you are cheery picking Isiah Thomas 2.0 to prove Jalen Brunson is some kind of fluke. Brunson is better now and since we live in the present (not the hot tub time machine) he's better period.

Return to The General Board