Markkanen

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Markkanen 

Post#1 » by Astaluego » Sat Jun 29, 2024 5:17 pm

Ainge will at least want to select a high-potential prospect and the next Draft is the ideal time to do so. .it wouldn't make sense to try to compete this next year (in my opinion) So what offer would you make for Lauri?
The Thunder fit perfectly, but who else makes sense and could make a great offer (I'm guessing at least a Bridges-type package) Would the Kings throw Murray+? The CAVS would try to get him back with Garland/Allen ( 3 team)?
Old Mike Lorenzo
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,821
And1: 35,908
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Markkanen 

Post#2 » by jbk1234 » Sat Jun 29, 2024 5:22 pm

Spurs are probably ideal as they have the most good 2025 picks.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
kds92
Pro Prospect
Posts: 951
And1: 750
Joined: Feb 06, 2022

Re: Markkanen 

Post#3 » by kds92 » Sat Jun 29, 2024 5:27 pm

Warriors would be a good fit, Thunder obviously, and maybe even the Lakers.

Dark horses could be the Sixers, Hawks, or Wolves (in a 3-way KAT deal)
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,096
And1: 3,419
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Markkanen 

Post#4 » by SkyHook » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:09 pm

I'll reiterate what I've said before... If the Jazz move Lauri, I expect them primarily to target a young stud from a team who wants to accelerate their timetable—a Jalen Williams type player. If that doesn't materialize (and I don't expect it to) the Jazz most likely opt to do the R+E and keep him long term (or entertain offers for him at a later date).

If they do go for a pick-centric deal, I'd expect them to prioritize the quality of pick packages (ATL picks owned by the Spurs & PHX picks owned by the Rockets are good starting points) over a large volume of less attractive picks (like what OKC has to offer).
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
CallMeKahn
Veteran
Posts: 2,570
And1: 1,918
Joined: Feb 17, 2013
     

Re: Markkanen 

Post#5 » by CallMeKahn » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:17 pm

SkyHook wrote:I'll reiterate what I've said before... If the Jazz move Lauri, I expect them primarily to target a young stud from a team who wants to accelerate their timetable—a Jalen Williams type player. If that doesn't materialize (and I don't expect it to) the Jazz most likely opt to do the R+E and keep him long term (or entertain offers for him at a later date).

If they do go for a pick-centric deal, I'd expect them to prioritize the quality of pick packages (ATL picks owned by the Spurs & PHX picks owned by the Rockets are good starting points) over a large volume of less attractive picks (like what OKC has to offer).


I'm expecting a pick-centric deal with a younger player thrown in. Ainge adores darts. That said, I don't really expect Utah to hold onto past the deadline next season. There is no point in hanging onto him when we should be trying to maximize the tank.
daoneandonly wrote:Utah doesnt have anyhting close value wise to get Dallas to even pick up the phone


Said in reference to Utah's trade assets in a potential Doncic deal.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,096
And1: 3,419
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Markkanen 

Post#6 » by SkyHook » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:21 pm

CallMeKahn wrote:
SkyHook wrote:I'll reiterate what I've said before... If the Jazz move Lauri, I expect them primarily to target a young stud from a team who wants to accelerate their timetable—a Jalen Williams type player. If that doesn't materialize (and I don't expect it to) the Jazz most likely opt to do the R+E and keep him long term (or entertain offers for him at a later date).

If they do go for a pick-centric deal, I'd expect them to prioritize the quality of pick packages (ATL picks owned by the Spurs & PHX picks owned by the Rockets are good starting points) over a large volume of less attractive picks (like what OKC has to offer).


I'm expecting a pick-centric deal with a younger player thrown in. Ainge adores darts. That said, I don't really expect Utah to hold onto past the deadline next season. There is no point in hanging onto him when we should be trying to maximize the tank.


Maximize the Keyonte minutes = maximize the tank.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,439
And1: 17,236
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Markkanen 

Post#7 » by Mavrelous » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:21 pm

Lauri for Jabari Smith Jr+ Suns 27 1st + best of DAL/Suns 1st in 29.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,354
And1: 9,901
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Markkanen 

Post#8 » by BlazersBroncos » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:46 pm

Mavrelous wrote:Lauri for Jabari Smith Jr+ Suns 27 1st + best of DAL/Suns 1st in 29.


Ya if HOU wants to win now this makes a lot of sense. And they still would have tons of young talent.

G - Fred VanVleet / Reed Sheppard
G - Jalen Green / Amen Thompson / AJ Griffin
F - Dillon Brooks / Cam Whitmore / AJ Griffin
F - Lauri Markkanen / Tari Eason / Jae’Sean Tate
C - Alpern Sengun / Steven Adams / Jock Landale

That’s pretty nasty. Easily the most athletic 2nd unit in basketball. Well rounded starters. Enough big salary ballast and future picks for another big move too.
User avatar
CallMeKahn
Veteran
Posts: 2,570
And1: 1,918
Joined: Feb 17, 2013
     

Re: Markkanen 

Post#9 » by CallMeKahn » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:48 pm

Mavrelous wrote:Lauri for Jabari Smith Jr+ Suns 27 1st + best of DAL/Suns 1st in 29.

I think there's enough there to have a conversation.
daoneandonly wrote:Utah doesnt have anyhting close value wise to get Dallas to even pick up the phone


Said in reference to Utah's trade assets in a potential Doncic deal.
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,151
And1: 5,456
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Markkanen 

Post#10 » by LarsV8 » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:52 pm

Jabari has more value than an expiring Lauri. You would have to add to get him.
Image
User avatar
CallMeKahn
Veteran
Posts: 2,570
And1: 1,918
Joined: Feb 17, 2013
     

Re: Markkanen 

Post#11 » by CallMeKahn » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:54 pm

LarsV8 wrote:Jabari has more value than an expiring Lauri. You would have to add to get him.

I needed that laugh, thank you. :lol:
daoneandonly wrote:Utah doesnt have anyhting close value wise to get Dallas to even pick up the phone


Said in reference to Utah's trade assets in a potential Doncic deal.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,689
And1: 1,364
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Markkanen 

Post#12 » by OGSactownballer » Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:58 pm

There is no way that the Kings send Murray.

Salary match that is secondarily moveable plus all available unprotected firsts necessary. I feel three plus two swaps is fair given that Lauri is not far removed from an injury history and his “All star” appearance happened to coincide (as a selection not voted) with the All Star game in SLC so I’m sure that was a confession as there were others on better teams that deserved the slot.

If that’s not good enough I’m perfectly happy as the Kings making other moves or taking Collins and a pick for the same salary breakup.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 5,900
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Markkanen 

Post#13 » by psman2 » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:00 pm

LarsV8 wrote:Jabari has more value than an expiring Lauri. You would have to add to get him.


Debatable, but Jabari is likely a better long term fit with Sengun defensive liabilities. As of fan of both players I would give up about the same from Memphis in trade but would prefer Jabari.
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: Markkanen 

Post#14 » by Wizop » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:03 pm

I doubt we could make the strongest offer, but he'd be a real fit on the Pacers.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,430
And1: 1,865
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Markkanen 

Post#15 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:13 pm

CallMeKahn wrote:
LarsV8 wrote:Jabari has more value than an expiring Lauri. You would have to add to get him.

I needed that laugh, thank you. :lol:


What does Lauri do better than Jabari? As a Thunder fan I'd much rather have Jabari and pay more to get him. Lauri is a slightly better shooter at this point, but Jabari just shot better from 3 at age 20 than Lauri did at age 24. Both are capable volume shooters from 3. Jabari is a better defensive player. Both have decent ball handling skills. You can argue Lauri will be better in '24-'25, but you can't argue that Jabari isn't the better asset given the age and contract status of both players.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,689
And1: 1,364
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Markkanen 

Post#16 » by OGSactownballer » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:14 pm

Wizop wrote:I doubt we could make the strongest offer, but he'd be a real fit on the Pacers.


Well Ainge isn’t taking Pascal back in that deal and you can’t deal him for six months after he signs.

So what would the offer be that would work for a rebuild team?
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: Markkanen 

Post#17 » by Wizop » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:19 pm

OGSactownballer wrote:
Wizop wrote:I doubt we could make the strongest offer, but he'd be a real fit on the Pacers.


Well Ainge isn’t taking Pascal back in that deal and you can’t deal him for six months after he signs.

So what would the offer be that would work for a rebuild team?


We'd want Lauri as a 3 not a 4. But we don't have multiple available picks. We'd have to start with Mathurin and maybe Nesmith but I don't think that moves Utah's needle.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
User avatar
ProcessDoctor
RealGM
Posts: 11,543
And1: 6,319
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
   

Re: Markkanen 

Post#18 » by ProcessDoctor » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:31 pm

The most Philly can offer is four 1sts and three 1st swaps.

Will be interesting to see where Lauri lands. I think the OKC thing is overblown. Just because they can doesn't mean they will. They'll be maxing Jalen and Chet in 2 years.

Houston and Sacramento make sense. I could also see Masai jumping from the top rope here.
2025-2026 Philadelphia 76ers:

Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Grimes/Edgecombe/Gordon
Oubre/Edwards
George/Watford/Walker
Embiid/Bona/Drummond/Broome
User avatar
Cappy_Smurf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,322
And1: 9,809
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
     

Re: Markkanen 

Post#19 » by Cappy_Smurf » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:41 pm

CallMeKahn wrote: There is no point in hanging onto him when we should be trying to maximize the tank.


At #8, Utah had a 6% chance at the #1 pick this draft. Meanwhile, the worst team in the league had a 14% chance at the #1 pick.

Utah is already a worse team after their deadline trade. If they don't improve the team, their percentage already goes up.

This so-called maximizing their tank equates to gaining just a few percentage points towards having a better shot at #1. It's not nearly the big difference some people are making it out to be.

Right now, Lauri isn't getting moved unless he refuses to extend.
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,151
And1: 5,456
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Markkanen 

Post#20 » by LarsV8 » Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:55 pm

Cappy_Smurf wrote:
CallMeKahn wrote: There is no point in hanging onto him when we should be trying to maximize the tank.


At #8, Utah had a 6% chance at the #1 pick this draft. Meanwhile, the worst team in the league had a 14% chance at the #1 pick.

Utah is already a worse team after their deadline trade. If they don't improve the team, their percentage already goes up.

This so-called maximizing their tank equates to gaining just a few percentage points towards having a better shot at #1. It's not nearly the big difference some people are making it out to be.

Right now, Lauri isn't getting moved unless he refuses to extend.


This isn't really accurate, because its not just the #1 pick, its top 4, which makes those percentages are wildly better for worse teams.

These partial rebuilds just don't really work.
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions