[Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
[Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,439
- And1: 17,236
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
[Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,402
- And1: 98,276
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
way too much money for a backup center. So this has to mean Chet is going to play some 4 despite the insistence of 5 out at all costs....
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,938
- And1: 4,137
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Huge, makes them the West favorites IMO. Really only thing they were missing
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Forum Mod - Thunder
- Posts: 13,387
- And1: 7,523
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
That's close to the money that Presti should have used on a PF. Big overpay but hope he will fit better than I think. Still great to add talent. Mixed feelings about this.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,598
- And1: 6,242
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Huge $ for Hartenstein but OKC can afford it
Have to assume he starts with that AAV.
Hartenstein / Jaylin W.
Chet / Kenrich W. / Dieng
Jalen W. / Wiggins / Dieng
Dort / Caruso / Joe
SGA / Cason
Definitely want to upgrade the backup PF spot but the rotation is shaping up nicely.
Have to assume he starts with that AAV.
Hartenstein / Jaylin W.
Chet / Kenrich W. / Dieng
Jalen W. / Wiggins / Dieng
Dort / Caruso / Joe
SGA / Cason
Definitely want to upgrade the backup PF spot but the rotation is shaping up nicely.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,220
- And1: 3,353
- Joined: Sep 06, 2013
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Wow, that's a contract. Good for him.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 951
- And1: 750
- Joined: Feb 06, 2022
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Overpay, but worth it. Contract is short enough that they can use him as filler in a trade (with picks) for a true star if they want to
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,763
- And1: 2,453
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Seems we overpaid abit.
Would have been fine with 75m/3 years but I guess he’s getting more to not close some games .
Would have been fine with 75m/3 years but I guess he’s getting more to not close some games .
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,763
- And1: 2,453
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Dadouv47 wrote:That's close to the money that Presti should have used on a PF. Big overpay but hope he will fit better than I think. Still great to add talent. Mixed feelings about this.
Which PF though in free agency ?
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,439
- And1: 17,236
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Chet was +14 on/off in the PO, he played amazing defense, but it was also the fact that he had no backup, team fell apart w/o him.
OKC can afford the 1st 2 years easily with Chet and JDub at rookie scale, but if they want to be serious contenders they need to have very high quality backup, higher quality than the Gaffords and Okongwus, since their defense relies a lot on rim protection when they play 4 guards mainly.
OKC can afford the 1st 2 years easily with Chet and JDub at rookie scale, but if they want to be serious contenders they need to have very high quality backup, higher quality than the Gaffords and Okongwus, since their defense relies a lot on rim protection when they play 4 guards mainly.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 47,322
- And1: 20,917
- Joined: Apr 07, 2010
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Val got 10m a year. This is a big bet.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,763
- And1: 2,453
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
HartfordWhalers wrote:Val got 10m a year. This is a big bet.
Yea I don’t have him as twice the player of Val for sure but OKC should be able afford this contract.
Hope he fits on the court .
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,824
- And1: 35,911
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Texas Chuck wrote:way too much money for a backup center. So this has to mean Chet is going to play some 4 despite the insistence of 5 out at all costs....
Hartenstein can shoot some. He's going to play a lot of minutes, and yes, the 5 out come what may got exposed against the Mavs. They would've had trouble with Denver and the Wolves as well.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,354
- And1: 9,901
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
HartfordWhalers wrote:Val got 10m a year. This is a big bet.
iHart is a wildly better defender than Val.
It’s an overpay but a short deal and really iHart is the exact guy that team needed.
I hope they can get in on the BRK fire sale and turn Kenrich and a pick into DFS. Think that would end the summer of moves for them.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,869
- And1: 7,831
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
It’s better for us than Presti landing Paul George.. But it’s not good for us..
I think I’d rather have seen OKC just do 2yr76 or something where there’s no complications on the 2026 books. but if it’s front loaded it’s only 27.5~ the year that matters so not that bad.
This is what they needed and they have the cap space. So why not.
They locked up great depth pieces, got a probable steal in the draft, solved their biggest need, and watched the Clippers upgrade their future picks.
Pretty great time for OKC fans.
I think I’d rather have seen OKC just do 2yr76 or something where there’s no complications on the 2026 books. but if it’s front loaded it’s only 27.5~ the year that matters so not that bad.
This is what they needed and they have the cap space. So why not.
They locked up great depth pieces, got a probable steal in the draft, solved their biggest need, and watched the Clippers upgrade their future picks.
Pretty great time for OKC fans.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,083
- And1: 14,454
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
It sucks to see the swat-brothers broken up, but I'm happy for Isaiah. OKC should be a great situation for him and that's a bag we just couldn't even come close to matching. Hopefully they take advantage of iHart's passing as well as his rebounding & defense.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,491
- And1: 43,636
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Yeah this is a lot but it makes OKC probably the best team in the West.
Hartenstein had a massive season in terms of impact stats and if he follows that up then OKC will dominate.
If he isn't a good fit then OKC will trade him.
Hartenstein had a massive season in terms of impact stats and if he follows that up then OKC will dominate.
If he isn't a good fit then OKC will trade him.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,349
- And1: 1,563
- Joined: May 14, 2011
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Congratulations to iHart. I knew the Knicks had a limit to what they could offer him but I never expected him to get paid this much. I wonder what his role will be in OKC. How is Chet at the 4? I can't imagine they paid this much money for iHart to come off the bench. Who knows.
I wonder who the Knicks will try to bring in to fill this hole left behind. I love Goga as an option. Not as high on Precious as some other Knicks fans but he would be ok as emergency depth.
Congratulations to iHart. I knew the Knicks had a limit to what they could offer him but I never expected him to get paid this much. I wonder what his role will be in OKC. How is Chet at the 4? I can't imagine they paid this much money for iHart to come off the bench. Who knows.
I wonder who the Knicks will try to bring in to fill this hole left behind. I love Goga as an option. Not as high on Precious as some other Knicks fans but he would be ok as emergency depth.
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,527
- And1: 3,647
- Joined: Feb 25, 2015
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
HartfordWhalers wrote:Val got 10m a year. This is a big bet.
This. IHart is better defensively but Val is better offensively and rebounding the ball. Big overpay..
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,757
- And1: 2,497
- Joined: Jan 18, 2019
-
Re: [Shams] -- Ihart to OKC 87/3
OKC reacting to the loss to mavs. Thats what I see it as, getting interior defense and a different look on offense. Seems as too much money, but maybe knicks were pressing from the other side so yhe price were driven up. Its imo a huge loss for knicks
Return to Trades and Transactions