Context wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:Context wrote:Trust me...its just more things...59 million and 36 million get you the same life...
I wont hold any grudge but I will say what I think. Ihart was great but I dont think he had a deep love for the knicks experience
and thats why he couldnt do this:
Mitchell Robinson is not the reason we won that series.
He played great defense for 1 game and then got hurt.
Offensively Mitchell Robinson makes us severely worse in various ways - less ball movement, more paint clogging, not a threat to score in any fashion other than lobs.
People can’t grasp that this is on 2k. You can’t just put a shot blocking center with no offense next to a bully ball player at PF to replace a great passing big and expect the same results and outcome. We will be easier to guard on offense, not harder.
If we didn't have Mitch - we lose that series. There is a reason Embiid was laying on the floor and pulled Mitch's leg out of the air.
Bruh we didn’t have Mitch most of the series and we won.
There were multiple reasons why we won the series - he contributed to those reasons. Saying he’s the sole reason we won is ludicrous.