The PJ Dozier Thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
The PJ Dozier Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 5,472
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,231
- And1: 4,818
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,204
- And1: 2,721
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
winforlose wrote:Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
Why are you forgeting that NAW started at PG when Conley missed some games last season?
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
Neeva wrote:winforlose wrote:Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
Why are you forgeting that NAW started at PG when Conley missed some games last season?
Precisely.
This just is further confirmation that Finch doesn't need a "true PG" in order to run his offense. That's never been how he's coached. That's also what Denver started to build Tim's last year (PGs behind Jamal were largely KCP and Bruce Brown) and why I think they've never brought in a "true PG" to back up Conley other than McLaughlin when he was here.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 5,472
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
Neeva wrote:winforlose wrote:Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
Why are you forgeting that NAW started at PG when Conley missed some games last season?
Why are you forgetting that we traded for Monte Morris so that wouldn’t keep happening? NAW doesn’t have the handle to play PG under pressure, and isn’t exactly a floor general when he does. This is why the numbers were so bad when Mike was off the court and JMAC was not in the rotation. PG Ant isn’t something he likes, he was talking about enjoying coming off ball more and not needing to create as much. SMFH, PJ Dozier.
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 5,472
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
I guess TC wants to give the kid a chance. His G league numbers are not bad, and someone said his abroad numbers are good. Overall, I think we took a deep PG rotation last year and made it paper thin. Time will tell if we get away with it, or if TC just doomed us.
https://stats.gleague.nba.com/player/1628408/
https://stats.gleague.nba.com/player/1628408/
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
winforlose wrote:I guess TC wants to give the kid a chance. His G league numbers are not bad, and someone said his abroad numbers are good. Overall, I think we took a deep PG rotation last year and made it paper thin. Time will tell if we get away with it, or if TC just doomed us.
https://stats.gleague.nba.com/player/1628408/
If only one was really rotation quality, was it really that deep? Meanwhile you add guys who can all still play-make somewhat while still being threats in other areas. Dozier is solid and switchable on defense too.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 27,211
- And1: 12,044
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
winforlose wrote:Neeva wrote:winforlose wrote:Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
Why are you forgeting that NAW started at PG when Conley missed some games last season?
Why are you forgetting that we traded for Monte Morris so that wouldn’t keep happening? NAW doesn’t have the handle to play PG under pressure, and isn’t exactly a floor general when he does. This is why the numbers were so bad when Mike was off the court and JMAC was not in the rotation. PG Ant isn’t something he likes, he was talking about enjoying coming off ball more and not needing to create as much. SMFH, PJ Dozier.
We traded for Monte, then he sat on the bench during the playoffs.
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,177
- And1: 2,877
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
winforlose wrote:Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
I get he didn't make the moves you wanted (the 2 moves you guaranteed he'd make), but man, you are just spiraling...

Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,177
- And1: 2,877
- Joined: Aug 25, 2020
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
Dupe post.
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,204
- And1: 2,721
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
Yea Monte was a mistake, I think Connely wanted to give him a try out but Finch wasn’t impressed and even NAW started over Monte when Conley was out in the playoffs. Wolves would have been better off keeping their 2030 srp
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,204
- And1: 2,721
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
He’s only 28 (his peak age) this upcoming season, for some reason I thought he was over 31-32.
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,636
- And1: 5,472
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:Just gonna say it. If RD flops this year you guys are change your tune on TC real quick.
I get he didn't make the moves you wanted (the 2 moves you guaranteed he'd make), but man, you are just spiraling...
Lol. Not gonna pretend I am not pissed. Not gonna pretend I expected any of TC’s moves this offseason. Spiraling is a bit much.
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 67,850
- And1: 21,592
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
- Dalvin
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,338
- And1: 1,088
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
-
Re: The PJ Dozier Thread
Is minimus Tim Connelly? Almost all the players minimus wanted are the ones TC are getting. From NAW, to Ingles to PJ Dozier 

shrink wrote:Good point, and welcome to the boards.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves