[Charania/Wojnarowski]: Derozan To Sacramento

Post #1 » by **bondom34** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:20 am

Read on Twitter

LightTheBeam · Post #2 » by **LightTheBeam** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:21 am

NO MORE BARNES WE HERE!! LETS GO!

BoogieTime · Post #3 » by **BoogieTime** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:22 am

Looks good

Godaddycurse · Post #4 » by **Godaddycurse** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:22 am

BoogieTime wrote:Wow, Spurs really taking Barnes and Duarte for free?

Just Barnes it seems. Duarte went to Bulls

LightTheBeam · Post #5 » by **LightTheBeam** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:22 am

BoogieTime wrote:Wow, Spurs really taking Barnes and Duarte for free?

Spurs taking Barnes was so obvious to me. Pop loves Barnes and he's the perfect guy to raise that team.

Post #6 » by **bondom34** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:23 am

Read on Twitter

BoogieTime · Post #7 » by **BoogieTime** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:23 am

Godaddycurse wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:Wow, Spurs really taking Barnes and Duarte for free?

Just Barnes it seems. Duarte went to Bulls

It’s good he had neutral value, was doubtful

-edit, of course he didn’t

JLiv · Post #8 » by **JLiv** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:24 am

Spurs moves this offseason have been questionable

Edit: the pick swap (assuming a 1st) makes up for it

Post #9 » by **Domejandro** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:24 am

I like this for San Antonio, they will benefit from having a pretty stable forward like Harrison Barnes in their rotation. Should be easy to trade next off-season, if they need to shave off his $19MM expiring salary.

Post #10 » by **bondom34** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:24 am

Read on Twitter

BoogieTime · Post #11 » by **BoogieTime** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:26 am

bondom34 wrote:

Read on Twitter

And there it is, damn….. was hoping Huerter had neutral value at least as an expiring

Malapropism · Post #12 » by **Malapropism** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:27 am

Barnes was not neutral. That pick swap is huge.

Post #13 » by **bondom34** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:28 am

Read on Twitter

eminence · Post #14 » by **eminence** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:32 am

Man, would’ve liked Utah to take Barnes (would’ve done it for free, would’ve loved it at this price).

Godaddycurse · Post #15 » by **Godaddycurse** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:37 am

are you allowed to trade 2032 pick swap? 25/26/27/28/29/30/31 = 7 years isnt it? Does the Stepien rule not apply to swaps? If thats the case then can 2nd apron teams trade far future swaps :-?

edit nvm

Post #16 » by **bondom34** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:38 am

Godaddycurse wrote:are you allowed to trade 2032 pick swap? 25/26/27/28/29/30/31 = 7 years isnt it? Does the Stepien rule not apply to swaps? If thats the case then can 2nd apron teams trade far future swaps

Read on Twitter

Godaddycurse · Post #17 » by **Godaddycurse** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:39 am

meanwhile Detroit continues to sell its capspace for 2nds isntead

babyjax13 · Post #18 » by **babyjax13** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:39 am

Count me as another "Barnes is neutral" at worst person. Good player who doesn't complain about a reduced role and kind of does a ton of what you need from a 3/4? I think San Antonio just had Sacramento by the balls because if Utah is doing an R+E they can't take Barnes for free, and I think no other team can just absorb him?

babyjax13 · Post #19 » by **babyjax13** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:40 am

eminence wrote:Man, would’ve liked Utah to take Barnes (would’ve done it for free, would’ve loved it at this price).

Yah, that's really wild they were able to extract that kind of swap as the third team in the deal.

typedrat · Post #20 » by **typedrat** » Sun Jul 7, 2024 2:41 am

Sad not to keep Barnes to be a bench guy, but I'm not going to miss his 2 points/0 rebounds/0 assists/25 minutes on the stationary bike games.