NoDopeOnSundays wrote:DOT wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:It's not 1994 anymore, you're hurting your own team in the long run if you aren't versatile. This is why we haven't seen much of Randle at the 5, despite the fact that should be a very real option against a lot of teams.
Fun fact time
Top 10 teams last year in ORB%:
1. Knicks (50-32)
2. Jazz (31-51)
3. Warriors (46-36)
4. Blazers (21-61)
5. Hawks (36-46)
6. Nuggets (57-25)
7. Magic (47-35)
8. Nets (32-50)
9. Rockets (41-41)
10. Bulls (39-43)
Combined record of 400-420, or 40-42 on average
So I would say there's no strong correlation between offensive rebounds and winning, and the 4 teams who went to the Conference Finals ranked 12th, 19th, 21st, and 24th in ORB%. Also those are percentage numbers, not raw numbers, so it's adjusted for pace.
If we don't win it'll be because the offense stalls out due to spacing, you can see it coming a mile away.
You don't even need 3pt shooting, you just need at least be able to hit the occasional mid and finish from slightly further away from the basket
This goes back to the conversation about iHart/Kessler/Mitch's finishing abilities, Mitch having an average distance of 1 feet from the rim is brutal for the offense. For his career, 55% of Mitch's made field goals are dunks, iHart is at 20% (25.8% last year), Kessler is at 35.2% (36.3% last year), even Nick Richards is at 33.8% career, 35.4% last year
Mitch shot 36.6% on layups last year, 42.2% the year before. iHart was 54.9% last year, 51.6% the year before
To be fair to Mitch, he did shoot 57% on layups in 2022 (which was his healthiest year in his career), but that's fallen off with the injuries.