[Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
[Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,967
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
[Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
so a 4/45 extension for Wiggins and 3/46 extension for Joe. LIkely to be announced after OKC uses up capspace (?hartenstein)
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,861
- And1: 7,825
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Not a bad idea.
Presti is really good at this game.
Presti is really good at this game.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,821
- And1: 35,908
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Wiggins is going to regret signing that deal, but it's hard to turn down your first bag.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
- MoneyTalks41890
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,742
- And1: 24,969
- Joined: Oct 13, 2009
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Great contracts for these guys. I’m very happy here.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,758
- And1: 2,451
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Not bad at all.
Now to find a big from somewhere.
Now to find a big from somewhere.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- Forum Mod - Thunder
- Posts: 13,387
- And1: 7,523
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
best news of the offseason as a Thunder. Certainly Presti underpaid a bit by doing them a favor declining their options
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,592
- And1: 6,237
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Dadouv47 wrote:best news of the offseason as a Thunder. Certainly Presti underpaid a bit by doing them a favor declining their options
For sure, Presti bought himself a lower per-year number on the long-term deal by sacrificing the one remaining year where they could have paid them peanuts. And they can afford to do this kind of thing because they've managed their cap so well.
But it seems like a win-win. Wiggins and Joe get to lock in life-changing money a year early and the Thunder lock up two rotation pieces long term on what will soon look like below-market deals.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,487
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
jbk1234 wrote:Wiggins is going to regret signing that deal, but it's hard to turn down your first bag.
4/$45m is fair for Wiggins
Remember Thunder could have just picked up his $2m option, so this is really 4/$45m.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,592
- And1: 6,237
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
zimpy27 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Wiggins is going to regret signing that deal, but it's hard to turn down your first bag.
4/$45m is fair for Wiggins
Remember Thunder could have just picked up his $2m option, so this is really 4/$45m.
Fair - looking at the AAV for comparison's sake should really just be new money v. new years, so it's more like 4/45 for Wiggins ($11.25M AAV) and 3/46 for Joe ($15.33M AAV).
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,592
- And1: 6,237
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
I wonder if Presti front-loaded these contracts? If he did these could look even better down the line.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,821
- And1: 35,908
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
zimpy27 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Wiggins is going to regret signing that deal, but it's hard to turn down your first bag.
4/$45m is fair for Wiggins
Remember Thunder could have just picked up his $2m option, so this is really 4/$45m.
It's a year too long from the player's perspective. He'll be well below the tax MLE in that 4th year.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,267
- And1: 9,753
- Joined: Feb 04, 2005
- Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Presti may be a little short on balls, but he’s flush in brains and long-term planning. Jealous.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,487
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
If you do descending structure, how useful is a team option really?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,861
- And1: 7,825
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
zimpy27 wrote:If you do descending structure, how useful is a team option really?
Doing the same exact thing in 3-4 years once one develops into a starting level player..
“Can keep you for 9 million this year or we can work out a new….”
Just looking at Spotrac.. Wiggins only makes 8 mil at age 30… whatever team he is on is going to be able to offer him 3yr42-45 instead of 1yr8.. Joe making only 11.3 and could easily be worth 20 million in 4 years..
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,487
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
jayjaysee wrote:zimpy27 wrote:If you do descending structure, how useful is a team option really?
Doing the same exact thing in 3-4 years once one develops into a starting level player..
“Can keep you for 9 million this year or we can work out a new….”
Just looking at Spotrac.. Wiggins only makes 8 mil at age 30… whatever team he is on is going to be able to offer him 3yr42-45 instead of 1yr8.. Joe making only 11.3 and could easily be worth 20 million in 4 years..
Good point actually, that seems to be the Presti special.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,116
- And1: 10,317
- Joined: May 01, 2010
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
Damn Glenn Rivers.
Refused to play Joe, so pushed Morey to waive him.
Like that kid a lot and good for him getting that bag.
Refused to play Joe, so pushed Morey to waive him.
Like that kid a lot and good for him getting that bag.
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,967
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
zimpy27 wrote:jayjaysee wrote:zimpy27 wrote:If you do descending structure, how useful is a team option really?
Doing the same exact thing in 3-4 years once one develops into a starting level player..
“Can keep you for 9 million this year or we can work out a new….”
Just looking at Spotrac.. Wiggins only makes 8 mil at age 30… whatever team he is on is going to be able to offer him 3yr42-45 instead of 1yr8.. Joe making only 11.3 and could easily be worth 20 million in 4 years..
Good point actually, that seems to be the Presti special.
Sure beats masai's special of PO for everyone (which he stopped doing this year.thankfully)
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: [Shams] - Wiggins 5/47 & Joe 4/48
zimpy27 wrote:If you do descending structure, how useful is a team option really?
It is very valuable. It gives the team full leverage over the player.
The player is likely going to be under compensated, thus willing to take another extension where he is under compensated to make up for the pay gap. See Mo Wagner this off-season.
Return to Trades and Transactions