Sac/uts/mem
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Sac/uts/mem
- jazzfan1971
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 39,327
- And1: 8,581
- Joined: Jul 16, 2001
- Location: Salt Lake City
-
Sac/uts/mem
To sac: jjj
Why: gives them an elite offball defender to offset sabonis weakness.
To mem: Lauri
Why: gives them a floor spacer that can rebound
To utah: Murray lyles and picks (picks negotiable)
Why for utah: more youth/assets
Why: gives them an elite offball defender to offset sabonis weakness.
To mem: Lauri
Why: gives them a floor spacer that can rebound
To utah: Murray lyles and picks (picks negotiable)
Why for utah: more youth/assets
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Re: Sac/uts/mem
- Rockazoids
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,487
- And1: 2,223
- Joined: Jun 05, 2008
- Location: Cincinnati
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
jazzfan1971 wrote:To sac: jjj
Why: gives them an elite offball defender to offset sabonis weakness.
To mem: Lauri
Why: gives them a floor spacer that can rebound
To utah: Murray lyles and picks (picks negotiable)
Why for utah: more youth/assets
If I'm MEM I'm not trading JJJ for Lauri. I think you are over Lauri.
And who is Murray Lyles?
Follow the science not some internet physician & get your shots.
Kerrsed wrote:Just thinking of this deal makes my ass hurt!
turk3d wrote: you're about to make me go old rem on you
GoNYK1288 wrote:You better clench your butt cheeks because the GB is about to have at you.
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,921
- And1: 12,057
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
ya i mean JJJ is one of those special players who fits perfectly next to Sabonis. While I love Keegan we would have to do this.
Can't imagine Memphis considers trading JJJ right now. Think they would want to add Lauri to the Ja/Bane/JJJ core.
Can't imagine Memphis considers trading JJJ right now. Think they would want to add Lauri to the Ja/Bane/JJJ core.
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,968
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Memphis can add lauri without trading JJJ
Re: Sac/uts/mem
- jazzfan1971
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 39,327
- And1: 8,581
- Joined: Jul 16, 2001
- Location: Salt Lake City
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
OK. I was wrong about how Memphis would view a jjj for Lauri Swap.
I felt like it would make them better. I think they disagree.
I felt like it would make them better. I think they disagree.
"Thibs called back and wanted more picks," said Jorge Sedano. "And Pat Riley, literally, I was told, called him a mother-bleeper and hung up the phone."
Re: Sac/uts/mem
- Cappy_Smurf
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,322
- And1: 9,809
- Joined: Apr 26, 2015
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Godaddycurse wrote:Memphis can't add lauri, with or without trading JJJ
Fixed
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,968
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Cappy_Smurf wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Memphis can't add lauri, with or without trading JJJ
Fixed
GG + 4 1sts is more than enough value
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,244
- And1: 3,904
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Godaddycurse wrote:Cappy_Smurf wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Memphis can't add lauri, with or without trading JJJ
Fixed
GG + 4 1sts is more than enough value
It’s not though because the last pick is the only one with value.
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,968
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
AingesBurner wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Cappy_Smurf wrote:
Fixed
GG + 4 1sts is more than enough value
It’s not though because the last pick is the only one with value.
The ask was for a bridges haul and i have GG + 4 1sts as worth more than what Brooklyn got
Re: Sac/uts/mem
- Cappy_Smurf
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,322
- And1: 9,809
- Joined: Apr 26, 2015
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Godaddycurse wrote:Cappy_Smurf wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Memphis can't add lauri, with or without trading JJJ
Fixed
GG + 4 1sts is more than enough value
I've gone over this before, but here's the deal with Utah; They can't afford to trade away star level talent without regard as to whether or not that player wants to stay in Utah. Whether or not Lauri stays with the Jazz depends on his willingness to stick with the Jazz. Utah can't afford to assume that whoever they trade him for won't be counting the days until they can seek greener grass.
As long as Lauri is good with staying in Utah, he isn't going anywhere without a significant overpay. Fair value isn't going to be enough to get Ainge to pull the trigger.
Also, Realgm doesn't really have a good grasp on trade value. The Gobert trade was declared the most lopsided trade in history, only for Minnesota to make it to the conference finals the next year. It's extremely possible Utah never gets a quality pick out of that transaction. So far, Minnesota has won that trade, despite RealGM's insistence that Gobert wasn't worth that kind of value. NBA fans tend to treat future picks as if they are worth top 5 value, when in reality they are more likely to be late lotto to mid-twenties.
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,244
- And1: 3,904
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Cappy_Smurf wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:Cappy_Smurf wrote:
Fixed
GG + 4 1sts is more than enough value
I've gone over this before, but here's the deal with Utah; They can't afford to trade away star level talent without regard as to whether or not that player wants to stay in Utah. Whether or not Lauri stays with the Jazz depends on his willingness to stick with the Jazz. Utah can't afford to assume that whoever they trade him for won't be counting the days until they can seek greener grass.
As long as Lauri is good with staying in Utah, he isn't going anywhere without a significant overpay. Fair value isn't going to be enough to get Ainge to pull the trigger.
Also, Realgm doesn't really have a good grasp on trade value. The Gobert trade was declared the most lopsided trade in history, only for Minnesota to make it to the conference finals the next year. It's extremely possible Utah never gets a quality pick out of that transaction. So far, Minnesota has won that trade, despite RealGM's insistence that Gobert wasn't worth that kind of value. NBA fans tend to treat future picks as if they are worth top 5 value, when in reality they are more likely to be late lotto to mid-twenties.
Bingo
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,222
- And1: 639
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
Lauri should stay in Utah
JJJ should stay in Memphis
Good deal for both
JJJ should stay in Memphis
Good deal for both
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,034
- And1: 703
- Joined: Dec 03, 2012
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
I like the idea of…
MEM GETS: Lauri Markkanen & Walker Kessler
SAC GETS: Jaren Jackson Jr.
UTA GETS: Keegan Murray + Picks
For MEM, Morant, Bane, & Markkanen seems like enough offensive talent to push them into that contender status and it would only help Morant considering how much more Markkanen would space the floor for him (vs Jackson Jr). Defensively, they replace Jackson Jr.’s rim protection with Kessler who’s on a cheap rookie deal. In fact, they’d have a young, cheap C rotation of Kessler and Edey which gives them 48 minutes of excellent rim protection, rebounding, and size.
For SAC, Jackson Jr. gives them the size/length they need at PF while still providing floor spacing for Fox, DeRozan, and Sabonis. Also, having an elite defender like Jackson would be very beneficial for a team that is playing DeRozan and Sabonis 34+ min a night.
For UTA, they get a blue chip prospect to kick start their rebuild and additional picks to further add to their assets.
MEM GETS: Lauri Markkanen & Walker Kessler
SAC GETS: Jaren Jackson Jr.
UTA GETS: Keegan Murray + Picks
For MEM, Morant, Bane, & Markkanen seems like enough offensive talent to push them into that contender status and it would only help Morant considering how much more Markkanen would space the floor for him (vs Jackson Jr). Defensively, they replace Jackson Jr.’s rim protection with Kessler who’s on a cheap rookie deal. In fact, they’d have a young, cheap C rotation of Kessler and Edey which gives them 48 minutes of excellent rim protection, rebounding, and size.
For SAC, Jackson Jr. gives them the size/length they need at PF while still providing floor spacing for Fox, DeRozan, and Sabonis. Also, having an elite defender like Jackson would be very beneficial for a team that is playing DeRozan and Sabonis 34+ min a night.
For UTA, they get a blue chip prospect to kick start their rebuild and additional picks to further add to their assets.
Re: Sac/uts/mem
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,009
- And1: 597
- Joined: May 22, 2018
-
Re: Sac/uts/mem
bpcox05 wrote:I like the idea of…
MEM GETS: Lauri Markkanen & Walker Kessler
SAC GETS: Jaren Jackson Jr.
UTA GETS: Keegan Murray + Picks
For MEM, Morant, Bane, & Markkanen seems like enough offensive talent to push them into that contender status and it would only help Morant considering how much more Markkanen would space the floor for him (vs Jackson Jr). Defensively, they replace Jackson Jr.’s rim protection with Kessler who’s on a cheap rookie deal. In fact, they’d have a young, cheap C rotation of Kessler and Edey which gives them 48 minutes of excellent rim protection, rebounding, and size.
For SAC, Jackson Jr. gives them the size/length they need at PF while still providing floor spacing for Fox, DeRozan, and Sabonis. Also, having an elite defender like Jackson would be very beneficial for a team that is playing DeRozan and Sabonis 34+ min a night.
For UTA, they get a blue chip prospect to kick start their rebuild and additional picks to further add to their assets.
Jaren like Ja and Bane are our core. Making them untouchable unless for better player who is clear upgrade. No need for Kessler with Edey. Lauri can be gotten without using any of our core.
Return to Trades and Transactions