Butter wrote:zzaj wrote:Butter wrote:
I dont think this is true. If Cronin would accept the Lakers deal, Jerami would probably be gone now.
I'm not sure what your second sentence has to do with it...if Cronin accepted ANY of the bad deals that came his way for Grant, Grant would be gone now. But he didn't/hasn't (thankfully) so Grant is part of the Blazers still...
What motivation does Cronin have to trade Grant? There is no incumbent player at his position that is waiting for the position to become vacant. Grant shot 40% from 3 on the worst 3pt shooting team in the league. By all accounts he's a great lockerroom guy, and for those who value it a Vet for guidance...
Cronin has shown that he likes to send guys to winning situations, and I have to imagine he's going to get what he paid in trade. So if you narrow down teams that are on the cusp of the POs or better, with room under the new CBA to take on Grant's long-term money, and are also willing to give up a good 1st round pick? There just aren't a lot of teams where a trade will work or makes sense--TODAY.
However, once team GMs pivot away from draft/future and are eyeing PO runs as a reality, things will open up.
It's likely that right now, things are getting held up because teams want to see what happens with Lauri and Ingram. If a trade of Grant is going to happen, it'll likely be after those things fall into place.
You said the Blazers aren't likely to trade Grant this summer, I'm saying I think they will. If nothing else comes along, yes, I think Cronin takes the Lakers offer.
There is no two ways around it, the Blazers are paying way too much for a non-playoff team. There is no value in eking out a few more wins for a team with no prospect for play-off wins.
Grant, Simons, and Ayton are only taking time from young players and decreasing the Blazers chances at Cooper Flag or Acey.
If it were up to me, I would prioritize moving the vets in this order:
1) Simons
2) Grant
3) Ayton
4) Matisse
Ah, Gotcha...I think I wasn't understanding your post. I agree 100% about the cost of a non-PO team...
Jason Stern would probably take issue with "no value in eking out a few more wins for a team with no prospect for play-off wins". I don't, honestly...
Personally, I don't think having or not having Grant and Simons on the team is going to have much of an effect on attendance and overall revenue. And if the Blazers PR can't come up with a campaign that really pushes the "hope" of the young guys, then they don't deserve those jobs.
The Blazers NEED a top 5 pick in '25, and preferably a top 10 pick in '26...although it'd be very encouraging if the quartet of Scoot/Sharpe/Deni/Clingan +'25 1st play well enough to get the Blazers out of the Lotto in '26.











