ScienceOfLosing wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Sakkreth wrote:Forget the offense, looked like one of the best defenders out there.
Yes. His defense was excellent. Plays with high IQ. His body looks NBA ready.
My thoughts as well. I think most are into the new guys but Rokas is closest to Thibs giving him minutes based purely on defense.
Overall he looked solid. But that should be no shock as he’s been playing professionally for years (with men.)
So, here's the thing on Rokas and Kolek, or Rokas vs Kolek.
Rokas looks like the better defender, more physical, at the very least his defense is a year ahead of Koleks.
Would Rokas be ok with coming to the Knicks for a 15 mpg backup role, where he's leaving a losing team with low playing time in Spain, but before he hits that next team in Europe? Would that be worth it to him?
Would the Knicks tell Rokas "Look, we can give you 15 mpg, you'll raise your value, your role might increase if we trade McBride, we may also be able to move you to another team in a year where you will play more" and would that work.
For Kolek, even though he's a bit older than Deuce was, would the Knicks basically G-League him for a year like they did with Deuce, and then promote him when the feel his defense evens out with Rokas, where Rokas is dealt?
Good problem to have.
Also, I think Rokas would look even better if the Knicks had even one center who could make a 10 to 12 foot jumper, since he relies on the P&R a lot. Not that him hitting the roll man isn't there, but it would maximize Rokas.