LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,458
- And1: 331
- Joined: Nov 26, 2003
LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Darius Garland, Jarret Allen
FOR
Austin Reaves, Gabe Vincent, Rui Hachimara, D. Russell
Why for CLE:
Garland was rumored to be available in order to even out the rotation and handle usage duties to Mitchell. The backcourt tandem did not have great success and Reaves could make more sense as a complimentary guard to Spider. Vincent/Russell can also duel it out for needed backup PG duties to a team that clearly misses Rubio.
Without Allen, the Cavs would rely on Mobley who is more suitable to play the 5. They now open up their front court slots to a deep rotation of spacing bigs in Rui to go along with Wade and Niang. This may be the better route around Mitchell. Finally, adding both Vincent and Russell may be overkill, but one can be that backup PG and the other is tradeable as an expiring deal.
PF R. Hachimura/ D. Wade
SF M. Straus/ C. Lavert
C E. Mobley/ G. Nnang
SG A. Reaves/ G. Vincent
PG D. Mitchell/ D. Russell
Why for LAL:
Garland can be a nice young passing of the torch PG and may be a better usage talent needed with the sunsetting of James and Davis. Allen is a much needed center presence, allowing Davis to move to the 4. The Lakers get bigger, get a nice future talent to run the offense and consolidate their rotation a bit while ensuring more min for backup youth in Hood Schifino and Chrsitie to emerge.
PF A. Davis / J. Vanderbilt
SF L. James/ C. Reddish
C J. Allen/ C. Castleton
SG D. Knecht/ M. Christie
PG D. Garland/ J. Hood-Schifino
FOR
Austin Reaves, Gabe Vincent, Rui Hachimara, D. Russell
Why for CLE:
Garland was rumored to be available in order to even out the rotation and handle usage duties to Mitchell. The backcourt tandem did not have great success and Reaves could make more sense as a complimentary guard to Spider. Vincent/Russell can also duel it out for needed backup PG duties to a team that clearly misses Rubio.
Without Allen, the Cavs would rely on Mobley who is more suitable to play the 5. They now open up their front court slots to a deep rotation of spacing bigs in Rui to go along with Wade and Niang. This may be the better route around Mitchell. Finally, adding both Vincent and Russell may be overkill, but one can be that backup PG and the other is tradeable as an expiring deal.
PF R. Hachimura/ D. Wade
SF M. Straus/ C. Lavert
C E. Mobley/ G. Nnang
SG A. Reaves/ G. Vincent
PG D. Mitchell/ D. Russell
Why for LAL:
Garland can be a nice young passing of the torch PG and may be a better usage talent needed with the sunsetting of James and Davis. Allen is a much needed center presence, allowing Davis to move to the 4. The Lakers get bigger, get a nice future talent to run the offense and consolidate their rotation a bit while ensuring more min for backup youth in Hood Schifino and Chrsitie to emerge.
PF A. Davis / J. Vanderbilt
SF L. James/ C. Reddish
C J. Allen/ C. Castleton
SG D. Knecht/ M. Christie
PG D. Garland/ J. Hood-Schifino
Read the best NBA Articles on the Web right here, delivering innovative insights and a unique perspectives on all the happenings of the league.
http://fullcourtanalytics.blogspot.com/
http://fullcourtanalytics.blogspot.com/
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
- GreekAlex
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,201
- And1: 1,815
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
This doesn’t seem close. The Lakers are stealing a ton of value,
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,569
- And1: 13,920
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
This is several FRP light. No reason for CLE to consider this.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,918
- And1: 2,565
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Cleveland counters with Garland and Allen for Davis and Vincent.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,592
- And1: 6,237
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Yeah this is not close at all for Cleveland. This package doesn't get you Allen or Garland, let alone both.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,821
- And1: 35,908
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Anytime you can trade two all stars in their prime for a nuetral value package full of role players, you have to jump on it.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,354
- And1: 9,901
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
This is like really bad for CLE.
I wouldnt move just Garland or Allen for this package.
I wouldnt move just Garland or Allen for this package.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
How is this not locked
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,159
- And1: 2,497
- Joined: Jul 22, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
I will say that Lakers lineup looks pretty stacked post trade
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,918
- And1: 2,565
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Mr Loggins wrote:I will say that Lakers lineup looks pretty stacked post trade
I'm pretty sure that's how Jesus felt when he turned water into wine...
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,230
- And1: 3,954
- Joined: Mar 19, 2015
- Location: Puerto Rico
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
One of the worst trade proposals I have ever seen.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,100
- And1: 1,436
- Joined: Jan 15, 2015
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
i’d say some teams in europa could offer an better offer
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,148
- And1: 2,496
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
Crazy fact: Russell may have had a better year than Garland last year and makes half as much money. He's also a former all-star in his age 22 season, for the Cavs' current coach!
I might do Russell/Rui/Reaves for Garland if Garland asked out, but that's a mid-season deal. Garland isn't going anywhere before we see what Atkinson does with him.
I might do Russell/Rui/Reaves for Garland if Garland asked out, but that's a mid-season deal. Garland isn't going anywhere before we see what Atkinson does with him.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,067
- And1: 17,585
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
I assumed this would be Garland and assets for Davis. As-is, pretty terrible for Cleveland. Also, I don't understand the Garland hate, does no one realize he was recovering from injury last year? He's really good...

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,821
- And1: 35,908
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
toooskies wrote:Crazy fact: Russell may have had a better year than Garland last year and makes half as much money. He's also a former all-star in his age 22 season, for the Cavs' current coach!
I might do Russell/Rui/Reaves for Garland if Garland asked out, but that's a mid-season deal. Garland isn't going anywhere before we see what Atkinson does with him.
That all star season was six years ago and since then Russell has been on three playoff teams none of whom have enjoyed much success with him.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,081
- And1: 12,898
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
GreekAlex wrote:This doesn’t seem close. The Lakers are stealing a ton of value,
My thoughts exactly.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,081
- And1: 12,898
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: LAL/CLE Lakers go for Garland/Allen, Cavs even out roster
eitanr wrote:Darius Garland, Jarret Allen
FOR
Austin Reaves, Gabe Vincent, Rui Hachimara, D. Russell
Why for CLE:
Garland was rumored to be available in order to even out the rotation and handle usage duties to Mitchell. The backcourt tandem did not have great success and Reaves could make more sense as a complimentary guard to Spider. Vincent/Russell can also duel it out for needed backup PG duties to a team that clearly misses Rubio.
Without Allen, the Cavs would rely on Mobley who is more suitable to play the 5. They now open up their front court slots to a deep rotation of spacing bigs in Rui to go along with Wade and Niang. This may be the better route around Mitchell. Finally, adding both Vincent and Russell may be overkill, but one can be that backup PG and the other is tradeable as an expiring deal.
PF R. Hachimura/ D. Wade
SF M. Straus/ C. Lavert
C E. Mobley/ G. Nnang
SG A. Reaves/ G. Vincent
PG D. Mitchell/ D. Russell
Why for LAL:
Garland can be a nice young passing of the torch PG and may be a better usage talent needed with the sunsetting of James and Davis. Allen is a much needed center presence, allowing Davis to move to the 4. The Lakers get bigger, get a nice future talent to run the offense and consolidate their rotation a bit while ensuring more min for backup youth in Hood Schifino and Chrsitie to emerge.
PF A. Davis / J. Vanderbilt
SF L. James/ C. Reddish
C J. Allen/ C. Castleton
SG D. Knecht/ M. Christie
PG D. Garland/ J. Hood-Schifino
Have you ever seen a trade where the two best players in the deal go to another team without quality picks involved?
This is a terrible attempt. Try harder and come back with a more balanced proposal.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Return to Trades and Transactions