Los_29 wrote:Scase wrote:ATLTimekeeper wrote:
Competing with teams isn't necessarily a bad thing. Good teams that need vets don't have much cap to give, and bad teams don't want to put money on vets. In hindsight, we know the market on bench players plummeted. We might have gotten Kelly for even cheaper (and probably would have). We might not have gotten Kelly at all, but then what is the big loss there? The team looks to be pretty bad, says they're fine with being pretty bad, and Kelly is 33 years old.
Not to mention JV just went to the wiz for 10/yr and had zero suitors, JV is inarguably a better player, who is marginally worse from 3, and can actually play centre as opposed to a PF playing the role of a stretch 5.
This is ultimately not a trade that I'll lose sleep over, but it's just another case of a wasted asset, and bidding against themselves for no reason.
JV is terrible center to have on a developing team. Olynyk is a good one to have especially with the pieces we have.
I’m sure there was a ton of demand for the 29th overall pick in a draft that was widely regarded as being awful.
So Olynyk is good, and Ainge wanted the pick for him. Yet at the same time there was no demand for a pick in an awful draft.
Gotcha. I guess Ainge who is widely regarded as one of, if not the best, FO exec in the league, is just dumb and doesn't know what he's doing.





























