ImageImageImageImageImage

Official RJ Barrett Thread

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper

User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 67,286
And1: 62,214
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1081 » by Raps in 4 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:14 pm

Boogie! wrote:
Scase wrote:
Boogie! wrote:
Rj Barrett is more suited to be our go to scorer vs Scottie Barnes tbh. I’m not saying he’ll be our best overall player necessarily but he should definitely become more of a focal point for the team.

I see Barnes as more of the Lowry with Barrett being the demar

Scotties scoring versatility potential is much higher than Rj, hopefully he takes another step this year. RJ has an extremely limited game that is very easy to shut down. Sag off him so he can't get a head of steam, and that's pretty much his entire game. He needs to become reliable from the 3 to spread the defence out a bit more.

Any solid team that game plans for him would shut him down pretty easily, just like DD. He's a decent stop gap, but he isn't a permanent solution, again, just like DD.


I can’t really take your opinion seriously considering you basically wanted to write him off when the trade happened. I don’t think you’re able to view his game objectively.


He really is a very limited scorer, and I've been high on him for a while now. His turnaround with us happened because we told him to stop taking mid-range shots and contested 3s. Most of his points come off drives and cuts now. He doesn't have the versatility to be a 1A scorer, at least if your goal is to be a good team.
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 20,660
And1: 11,412
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1082 » by MEDIC » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:37 pm

Jaylen Brown doesn't have the talent to be a 1A scorer, but he was an important piece the Celtics championship

I am not saying RJ is as good as Brown (especially on D), but I think that's his ceiling. Whether he can get there....who knows.

I think this team needs to follow the Celtics team building philosophy. Scottie needs to keep working on his game until he becomes as impactful as Tatum (obviously in a different way). Quick and RJ need to level up significantly. Then you spend a few years tinkering to find the right mix of players.

I personally think it's doable. At minimum I think this core can become a Derozan/ Lowry level ECF team. That should be the goal for now. Year after year focus on moving up the standings, until you are near or at the top. Figure the rest out once you get there.
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1083 » by Scase » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:41 pm

Boogie! wrote:
Scase wrote:
Boogie! wrote:
Rj Barrett is more suited to be our go to scorer vs Scottie Barnes tbh. I’m not saying he’ll be our best overall player necessarily but he should definitely become more of a focal point for the team.

I see Barnes as more of the Lowry with Barrett being the demar

Scotties scoring versatility potential is much higher than Rj, hopefully he takes another step this year. RJ has an extremely limited game that is very easy to shut down. Sag off him so he can't get a head of steam, and that's pretty much his entire game. He needs to become reliable from the 3 to spread the defence out a bit more.

Any solid team that game plans for him would shut him down pretty easily, just like DD. He's a decent stop gap, but he isn't a permanent solution, again, just like DD.


I can’t really take your opinion seriously considering you basically wanted to write him off when the trade happened. I don’t think you’re able to view his game objectively.

Take it however you want, bias doesn't change objective fact. He has physical limitations, and his game is shallow. Nothing has changed since we traded for him, he got more efficient over a small sample size, which is great and I hope he can keep it up. But that doesn't change the fundamental deficiencies in his game, same as DD, love him or hate him, his game is his game.

We changed his shot diet and put him in better spots, that's it. He hasn't suddenly become a different player, we're just using him smarter. Doesn't change his ceiling.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
HiJiNX
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 16,606
And1: 15,966
Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Location: T-Dot

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1084 » by HiJiNX » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:45 pm

Scase, I agree with you.

Derozan was limited in the playoffs by his actual ability—can’t shoot the three. Wasn’t a strong enough one on one player with us (he’s become way better here since he was traded). Not strong enough or explosive enough or long enough (he needed at least one of those three qualities) to overwhelm defences and create consistent advantages. Beating Derozan was all about keeping him on the perimeter and staying on his right hand.

RJ is only very efficient on drives and open threes. Without any midrange savvy it’ll be hard to see him take his game to the next level. I’m a big RJ fan (my little brother played on the same team with him as a youth) but he has limitations. Not explosive enough. Maybe a little too big. Can’t shoot off the dribble at all. Poor reaction time defensively. Too much tunnel vision once he’s made up his mind to score. Some of these things can be fixed but some can’t.

Scottie, while not yet a great scorer has a lot of potential there because of his physical attributes and passing game. He also has shown flashes of go-to skills on all three levels—mid range step backs, turnarounds, pull ups, hits the three all over the court, back to the basket (needs to spin both directions), finishes with both hands. And he’s just so frigging big and strong. He can overpower almost every player in the league. Scottie just needs some refinement. Good to hear at the press conference yesterday that the team kept him in Toronto all summer to work with their development team. I guess they didn’t like how little progress his offensive skills have made with his own guy—I agree with them. His handle and jumper should be a little better than they are. But even more, I think the development team will be able to work on more game situations with him (ex. DHO reads, pnr reads, high post stuff, etc.).

Looking forward to next year. RJ will probably average more ppg than Scottie because he’s just so aggressive but Scottie is the guy who will bend the defence, the one they’re gonna worry about.
not strong, only aggresive cuz the power ain't directed/ that's why, we are subjected to the will of the oppressive
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,735
And1: 47,501
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1085 » by Tor_Raps » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:55 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:If RJ puts up 22,6,4 again while shooting 55% from the field and 39% from deep - he's gonna get an All-Star nod.


I love Rj as he became my favourite Raptor after he got traded here but its gonna be tough to do that when you're the 2nd/3rd best player of a bottom 10 team lol.
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,842
And1: 26,050
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1086 » by ItsDanger » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:58 pm

If RJ gets that baseline jumper and floater to a consistent level, he'll be a reliable 3rd option scorer, maybe 2nd option against bench units. Otherwise, he's kind of limited to drives/C&S 3s
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
youngRAPZ
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,290
And1: 1,037
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1087 » by youngRAPZ » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:59 pm

Boogie! wrote:
Scase wrote:
Boogie! wrote:
Rj Barrett is more suited to be our go to scorer vs Scottie Barnes tbh. I’m not saying he’ll be our best overall player necessarily but he should definitely become more of a focal point for the team.

I see Barnes as more of the Lowry with Barrett being the demar

Scotties scoring versatility potential is much higher than Rj, hopefully he takes another step this year. RJ has an extremely limited game that is very easy to shut down. Sag off him so he can't get a head of steam, and that's pretty much his entire game. He needs to become reliable from the 3 to spread the defence out a bit more.

Any solid team that game plans for him would shut him down pretty easily, just like DD. He's a decent stop gap, but he isn't a permanent solution, again, just like DD.


I can’t really take your opinion seriously considering you basically wanted to write him off when the trade happened. I don’t think you’re able to view his game objectively.

He’s been saying the exact same thing in every post since the start of the thread. Anytime RJ is mentioned Scase will soon follow to inform us again that he thinks rj isn’t a long term starter.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1088 » by Scase » Tue Jul 9, 2024 9:38 pm

HiJiNX wrote:Scase, I agree with you.

Derozan was limited in the playoffs by his actual ability—can’t shoot the three. Wasn’t a strong enough one on one player with us (he’s become way better here since he was traded). Not strong enough or explosive enough or long enough (he needed at least one of those three qualities) to overwhelm defences and create consistent advantages. Beating Derozan was all about keeping him on the perimeter and staying on his right hand.

RJ is only very efficient on drives and open threes. Without any midrange savvy it’ll be hard to see him take his game to the next level. I’m a big RJ fan (my little brother played on the same team with him as a youth) but he has limitations. Not explosive enough. Maybe a little too big. Can’t shoot off the dribble at all. Poor reaction time defensively. Too much tunnel vision once he’s made up his mind to score. Some of these things can be fixed but some can’t.

Scottie, while not yet a great scorer has a lot of potential there because of his physical attributes and passing game. He also has shown flashes of go-to skills on all three levels—mid range step backs, turnarounds, pull ups, hits the three all over the court, back to the basket (needs to spin both directions), finishes with both hands. And he’s just so frigging big and strong. He can overpower almost every player in the league. Scottie just needs some refinement. Good to hear at the press conference yesterday that the team kept him in Toronto all summer to work with their development team. I guess they didn’t like how little progress his offensive skills have made with his own guy—I agree with them. His handle and jumper should be a little better than they are. But even more, I think the development team will be able to work on more game situations with him (ex. DHO reads, pnr reads, high post stuff, etc.).

Looking forward to next year. RJ will probably average more ppg than Scottie because he’s just so aggressive but Scottie is the guy who will bend the defence, the one they’re gonna worry about.

Yup, this is exactly it.

There's a reason why some players are 3 level scorers, and others are not. Scottie still has a ways to go, but he has every single physical tool he needs to be oppressive on offence. I wish he had a quicker first step, but his size helps make up for it. He has shown that he can score in a huge variety of ways, we just need to see him focus in on a few and make them his bread and butter.

Scottie for as well as he performed, is pretty raw offensively, yet also way ahead of what we were led to believe he would be from being drafted.

I'm not sure why so many people get offended when calling out RJs clear limitations, no one is saying he's a bad basketball player. Just that there are certain things he can, and can't do, he has a rather limited ceiling offensively and that's fine, we just need to continue using him in smarter ways to negate those limitations. But that doesn't mean that opposing defences are going to just let him do what he wants. He's going into year 6 now, if he was going to have a reliable 3 or middy, he'd already have it by now, or at least most of it down.

Some players are cornerstones of a franchise/core, some aren't. There's no need to get in your feels just because a player isn't. I hope, and to a certain degree, expect him to further refine his game. But, I think it's relatively fair to say what we see is what we will get moving forward, but with improvements along the way. But he isn't likely to magically morph into a top tier scorer this late in the game, he's shown that he doesn't have the bag/physical tools to achieve that, and that's fine, as is being realistic about a player.

Tons of people said the same thing about DD back in the day, and lo and behold, it was reality. Doesn't make him a bad player, just limited in his ceiling.
Image
Props TZ!
raincityraptors
Senior
Posts: 591
And1: 995
Joined: Mar 30, 2011

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1089 » by raincityraptors » Tue Jul 9, 2024 10:00 pm

Y'all need to go watch some tape of Manu and see what he was able to do with his left hand. The ceiling on limited left handed players is different than the ceiling on most limited right handed players because you have to guard them differently than most of the league.

RJ and Darko talk about Manu in reference to RJ's game. I'm sure there is a source for that out there somewhere.

Part of the reason why RJ is now my favorite Raptor is because of how much his game since joining the team reminds me of Manu.

So everyone here saying RJ can be a number 1 option, I'm with you - Manu was a finals MVP.

And for anyone thinks, he would be best utilized off the bench, I'm with you too - Manu killed it off the bench and still played like someone worthy of all-star consideration.

I like the Scottie/RJ fit just as much as Scottie/IQ. I love all 3 of these players and like that they bring different things to the table.

RJ is my favorite though, so I'm biased as hell. How can you not love the way he played for us last year? (On one side of the ball anyway)

Scase wrote:
HiJiNX wrote:Scase, I agree with you.

Derozan was limited in the playoffs by his actual ability—can’t shoot the three. Wasn’t a strong enough one on one player with us (he’s become way better here since he was traded). Not strong enough or explosive enough or long enough (he needed at least one of those three qualities) to overwhelm defences and create consistent advantages. Beating Derozan was all about keeping him on the perimeter and staying on his right hand.

RJ is only very efficient on drives and open threes. Without any midrange savvy it’ll be hard to see him take his game to the next level. I’m a big RJ fan (my little brother played on the same team with him as a youth) but he has limitations. Not explosive enough. Maybe a little too big. Can’t shoot off the dribble at all. Poor reaction time defensively. Too much tunnel vision once he’s made up his mind to score. Some of these things can be fixed but some can’t.

Scottie, while not yet a great scorer has a lot of potential there because of his physical attributes and passing game. He also has shown flashes of go-to skills on all three levels—mid range step backs, turnarounds, pull ups, hits the three all over the court, back to the basket (needs to spin both directions), finishes with both hands. And he’s just so frigging big and strong. He can overpower almost every player in the league. Scottie just needs some refinement. Good to hear at the press conference yesterday that the team kept him in Toronto all summer to work with their development team. I guess they didn’t like how little progress his offensive skills have made with his own guy—I agree with them. His handle and jumper should be a little better than they are. But even more, I think the development team will be able to work on more game situations with him (ex. DHO reads, pnr reads, high post stuff, etc.).

Looking forward to next year. RJ will probably average more ppg than Scottie because he’s just so aggressive but Scottie is the guy who will bend the defence, the one they’re gonna worry about.

Yup, this is exactly it.

There's a reason why some players are 3 level scorers, and others are not. Scottie still has a ways to go, but he has every single physical tool he needs to be oppressive on offence. I wish he had a quicker first step, but his size helps make up for it. He has shown that he can score in a huge variety of ways, we just need to see him focus in on a few and make them his bread and butter.

Scottie for as well as he performed, is pretty raw offensively, yet also way ahead of what we were led to believe he would be from being drafted.

I'm not sure why so many people get offended when calling out RJs clear limitations, no one is saying he's a bad basketball player. Just that there are certain things he can, and can't do, he has a rather limited ceiling offensively and that's fine, we just need to continue using him in smarter ways to negate those limitations. But that doesn't mean that opposing defences are going to just let him do what he wants. He's going into year 6 now, if he was going to have a reliable 3 or middy, he'd already have it by now, or at least most of it down.

Some players are cornerstones of a franchise/core, some aren't. There's no need to get in your feels just because a player isn't. I hope, and to a certain degree, expect him to further refine his game. But, I think it's relatively fair to say what we see is what we will get moving forward, but with improvements along the way. But he isn't likely to magically morph into a top tier scorer this late in the game, he's shown that he doesn't have the bag/physical tools to achieve that, and that's fine, as is being realistic about a player.

Tons of people said the same thing about DD back in the day, and lo and behold, it was reality. Doesn't make him a bad player, just limited in his ceiling.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1090 » by Scase » Tue Jul 9, 2024 10:54 pm

raincityraptors wrote:Y'all need to go watch some tape of Manu and see what he was able to do with his left hand. The ceiling on limited left handed players is different than the ceiling on most limited right handed players because you have to guard them differently than most of the league.

RJ and Darko talk about Manu in reference to RJ's game. I'm sure there is a source for that out there somewhere.

Part of the reason why RJ is now my favorite Raptor is because of how much his game since joining the team reminds me of Manu.

So everyone here saying RJ can be a number 1 option, I'm with you - Manu was a finals MVP.

And for anyone thinks, he would be best utilized off the bench, I'm with you too - Manu killed it off the bench and still played like someone worthy of all-star consideration.

I like the Scottie/RJ fit just as much as Scottie/IQ. I love all 3 of these players and like that they bring different things to the table.

RJ is my favorite though, so I'm biased as hell. How can you not love the way he played for us last year? (On one side of the ball anyway)

Scase wrote:
HiJiNX wrote:Scase, I agree with you.

Derozan was limited in the playoffs by his actual ability—can’t shoot the three. Wasn’t a strong enough one on one player with us (he’s become way better here since he was traded). Not strong enough or explosive enough or long enough (he needed at least one of those three qualities) to overwhelm defences and create consistent advantages. Beating Derozan was all about keeping him on the perimeter and staying on his right hand.

RJ is only very efficient on drives and open threes. Without any midrange savvy it’ll be hard to see him take his game to the next level. I’m a big RJ fan (my little brother played on the same team with him as a youth) but he has limitations. Not explosive enough. Maybe a little too big. Can’t shoot off the dribble at all. Poor reaction time defensively. Too much tunnel vision once he’s made up his mind to score. Some of these things can be fixed but some can’t.

Scottie, while not yet a great scorer has a lot of potential there because of his physical attributes and passing game. He also has shown flashes of go-to skills on all three levels—mid range step backs, turnarounds, pull ups, hits the three all over the court, back to the basket (needs to spin both directions), finishes with both hands. And he’s just so frigging big and strong. He can overpower almost every player in the league. Scottie just needs some refinement. Good to hear at the press conference yesterday that the team kept him in Toronto all summer to work with their development team. I guess they didn’t like how little progress his offensive skills have made with his own guy—I agree with them. His handle and jumper should be a little better than they are. But even more, I think the development team will be able to work on more game situations with him (ex. DHO reads, pnr reads, high post stuff, etc.).

Looking forward to next year. RJ will probably average more ppg than Scottie because he’s just so aggressive but Scottie is the guy who will bend the defence, the one they’re gonna worry about.

Yup, this is exactly it.

There's a reason why some players are 3 level scorers, and others are not. Scottie still has a ways to go, but he has every single physical tool he needs to be oppressive on offence. I wish he had a quicker first step, but his size helps make up for it. He has shown that he can score in a huge variety of ways, we just need to see him focus in on a few and make them his bread and butter.

Scottie for as well as he performed, is pretty raw offensively, yet also way ahead of what we were led to believe he would be from being drafted.

I'm not sure why so many people get offended when calling out RJs clear limitations, no one is saying he's a bad basketball player. Just that there are certain things he can, and can't do, he has a rather limited ceiling offensively and that's fine, we just need to continue using him in smarter ways to negate those limitations. But that doesn't mean that opposing defences are going to just let him do what he wants. He's going into year 6 now, if he was going to have a reliable 3 or middy, he'd already have it by now, or at least most of it down.

Some players are cornerstones of a franchise/core, some aren't. There's no need to get in your feels just because a player isn't. I hope, and to a certain degree, expect him to further refine his game. But, I think it's relatively fair to say what we see is what we will get moving forward, but with improvements along the way. But he isn't likely to magically morph into a top tier scorer this late in the game, he's shown that he doesn't have the bag/physical tools to achieve that, and that's fine, as is being realistic about a player.

Tons of people said the same thing about DD back in the day, and lo and behold, it was reality. Doesn't make him a bad player, just limited in his ceiling.

Listen, I get what you are trying to say, but if you think Manu was great because he was a lefty, then you might need to rethink this whole argument.

Manu wasn't good because he was a lefty, Manu was good and he was a lefty. Manu was a better shooter/scorer from literally every spot on the court compared to RJ. Manu was a very smart player, which was a major reason why he was as good as he was, he had a great feel for the game and knew how to react in virtually all instances. Manus worst season in the league from an efficiency standpoint, was better than the best year of RJs career until the bump from playing here.

Rj is not the same, he is however, also a lefty. Manu came into the league older and definitely more refined, but he was also just a better player period. I'm fine with RJ modelling his game after Manu, but it doesn't mean he will be half as good either.
Image
Props TZ!
Loso04
Pro Prospect
Posts: 866
And1: 308
Joined: Jan 25, 2011

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1091 » by Loso04 » Thu Jul 25, 2024 2:26 pm

;pp=ygUVcmogYmFycmV0dCBoaWdobGlnaHRz
billy_hoyle
Starter
Posts: 2,473
And1: 1,590
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1092 » by billy_hoyle » Thu Jul 25, 2024 3:58 pm

Scase wrote:
raincityraptors wrote:Y'all need to go watch some tape of Manu and see what he was able to do with his left hand. The ceiling on limited left handed players is different than the ceiling on most limited right handed players because you have to guard them differently than most of the league.

RJ and Darko talk about Manu in reference to RJ's game. I'm sure there is a source for that out there somewhere.

Part of the reason why RJ is now my favorite Raptor is because of how much his game since joining the team reminds me of Manu.

So everyone here saying RJ can be a number 1 option, I'm with you - Manu was a finals MVP.

And for anyone thinks, he would be best utilized off the bench, I'm with you too - Manu killed it off the bench and still played like someone worthy of all-star consideration.

I like the Scottie/RJ fit just as much as Scottie/IQ. I love all 3 of these players and like that they bring different things to the table.

RJ is my favorite though, so I'm biased as hell. How can you not love the way he played for us last year? (On one side of the ball anyway)

Scase wrote:Yup, this is exactly it.

There's a reason why some players are 3 level scorers, and others are not. Scottie still has a ways to go, but he has every single physical tool he needs to be oppressive on offence. I wish he had a quicker first step, but his size helps make up for it. He has shown that he can score in a huge variety of ways, we just need to see him focus in on a few and make them his bread and butter.

Scottie for as well as he performed, is pretty raw offensively, yet also way ahead of what we were led to believe he would be from being drafted.

I'm not sure why so many people get offended when calling out RJs clear limitations, no one is saying he's a bad basketball player. Just that there are certain things he can, and can't do, he has a rather limited ceiling offensively and that's fine, we just need to continue using him in smarter ways to negate those limitations. But that doesn't mean that opposing defences are going to just let him do what he wants. He's going into year 6 now, if he was going to have a reliable 3 or middy, he'd already have it by now, or at least most of it down.

Some players are cornerstones of a franchise/core, some aren't. There's no need to get in your feels just because a player isn't. I hope, and to a certain degree, expect him to further refine his game. But, I think it's relatively fair to say what we see is what we will get moving forward, but with improvements along the way. But he isn't likely to magically morph into a top tier scorer this late in the game, he's shown that he doesn't have the bag/physical tools to achieve that, and that's fine, as is being realistic about a player.

Tons of people said the same thing about DD back in the day, and lo and behold, it was reality. Doesn't make him a bad player, just limited in his ceiling.

Listen, I get what you are trying to say, but if you think Manu was great because he was a lefty, then you might need to rethink this whole argument.

Manu wasn't good because he was a lefty, Manu was good and he was a lefty. Manu was a better shooter/scorer from literally every spot on the court compared to RJ. Manu was a very smart player, which was a major reason why he was as good as he was, he had a great feel for the game and knew how to react in virtually all instances. Manus worst season in the league from an efficiency standpoint, was better than the best year of RJs career until the bump from playing here.

Rj is not the same, he is however, also a lefty. Manu came into the league older and definitely more refined, but he was also just a better player period. I'm fine with RJ modelling his game after Manu, but it doesn't mean he will be half as good either.


When you say 'Manu came into the league older', I think it's worth clarifying that he was 25 when he came into the league and averaged 7.6pt, 2, 2 on 34% from 3. It's not a young freshman vs senior type comparison. It's much more extreme.

RJ is entering his age 24 season. At 23, he averaged 22, 6 and 4 on 39% from three in 32 games with the Raps.

I'm not even sure why you are comparing their career arcs, but at their same age it's pretty obvious who was the better player. Now projecting forward is actually the hard part. No one would believe you that Manu would end up being a down ballot MVP candidate at 25.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1093 » by Scase » Thu Jul 25, 2024 6:47 pm

billy_hoyle wrote:
Scase wrote:
raincityraptors wrote:Y'all need to go watch some tape of Manu and see what he was able to do with his left hand. The ceiling on limited left handed players is different than the ceiling on most limited right handed players because you have to guard them differently than most of the league.

RJ and Darko talk about Manu in reference to RJ's game. I'm sure there is a source for that out there somewhere.

Part of the reason why RJ is now my favorite Raptor is because of how much his game since joining the team reminds me of Manu.

So everyone here saying RJ can be a number 1 option, I'm with you - Manu was a finals MVP.

And for anyone thinks, he would be best utilized off the bench, I'm with you too - Manu killed it off the bench and still played like someone worthy of all-star consideration.

I like the Scottie/RJ fit just as much as Scottie/IQ. I love all 3 of these players and like that they bring different things to the table.

RJ is my favorite though, so I'm biased as hell. How can you not love the way he played for us last year? (On one side of the ball anyway)


Listen, I get what you are trying to say, but if you think Manu was great because he was a lefty, then you might need to rethink this whole argument.

Manu wasn't good because he was a lefty, Manu was good and he was a lefty. Manu was a better shooter/scorer from literally every spot on the court compared to RJ. Manu was a very smart player, which was a major reason why he was as good as he was, he had a great feel for the game and knew how to react in virtually all instances. Manus worst season in the league from an efficiency standpoint, was better than the best year of RJs career until the bump from playing here.

Rj is not the same, he is however, also a lefty. Manu came into the league older and definitely more refined, but he was also just a better player period. I'm fine with RJ modelling his game after Manu, but it doesn't mean he will be half as good either.


When you say 'Manu came into the league older', I think it's worth clarifying that he was 25 when he came into the league and averaged 7.6pt, 2, 2 on 34% from 3. It's not a young freshman vs senior type comparison. It's much more extreme.

RJ is entering his age 24 season. At 23, he averaged 22, 6 and 4 on 39% from three in 32 games with the Raps.

I'm not even sure why you are comparing their career arcs, but at their same age it's pretty obvious who was the better player. Now projecting forward is actually the hard part. No one would believe you that Manu would end up being a down ballot MVP candidate at 25.

Well for one, you're comparing manus rookie season on a team with an already established pecking order containing 2 HOF players, vs a 32 game sample size of RJ with the raps. RJ had 15.5FGA vs 5.8 for Manu, while RJ played 33mpg vs Manus 20mpg. So yeah, his counting stats will be higher. That is an awful comparison to make.

Manu was objectively the better player coming into the league, try not to forget that basketball existed outside the NBA and he was pulling in MVPs and championships before ever even debuting. Manu has tons of experience and accolades when he entered the NBA, you're trying to suggest that RJ is better at the same age based on stats, while ignoring that one was a top 3 pick, and the other was the 57th pick in a draft, and joining a team that won 58 games the season before.

I'm comparing career arcs because nothing about these players suggests any overlap in their play styles and potential career accomplishments exist, aside from them both being lefties.

Dude had to play behind Tony Parker ffs lol.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 20,660
And1: 11,412
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1094 » by MEDIC » Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:13 pm

If RJ morphs into a Derozan level scorer, it's a huge win regardless of the.defensive side.

I do think RJ is more competitive & competent defensively, though.

Derozan and RJ are similar players. Different limitations, but similar ceilings. Nothing wrong with that.

The biggest thing I like about RJ's game over DD's is he is better at finishing through contact & his game doesn't rely heavily on having the whistle blown in his favor. DD was a foul merchant & when he wasn't getting the calls, it affected his mental approach to the game. It was frustrating to watch. RJ is more level headed than DD. Just keeps playing.

Plus......being able to hit the 3 is a massive plus as well.

Derozan needed to be somewhat ball dominant to get his game working. Lots of iso touches.........but his game isn't strong enough to be "the guy". RJ is being effective off the ball & is still scoring 20+ ppg doing so.

I would take RJ's skillset & ability to fit within the offense 10/10 times over Derozan.

RJ doesn't need to be #1 option to be a useful piece. Right now he is playing kind or like a prime Richard Jefferson, which is a good fit beside Scottie & a good fit on this team.

If Scottie can level up & become a 25ppg scorer, the SB/ RJ/ IQ trio is going to be a strong one.
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
billy_hoyle
Starter
Posts: 2,473
And1: 1,590
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1095 » by billy_hoyle » Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:25 pm

Scase wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
Scase wrote:Listen, I get what you are trying to say, but if you think Manu was great because he was a lefty, then you might need to rethink this whole argument.

Manu wasn't good because he was a lefty, Manu was good and he was a lefty. Manu was a better shooter/scorer from literally every spot on the court compared to RJ. Manu was a very smart player, which was a major reason why he was as good as he was, he had a great feel for the game and knew how to react in virtually all instances. Manus worst season in the league from an efficiency standpoint, was better than the best year of RJs career until the bump from playing here.

Rj is not the same, he is however, also a lefty. Manu came into the league older and definitely more refined, but he was also just a better player period. I'm fine with RJ modelling his game after Manu, but it doesn't mean he will be half as good either.


When you say 'Manu came into the league older', I think it's worth clarifying that he was 25 when he came into the league and averaged 7.6pt, 2, 2 on 34% from 3. It's not a young freshman vs senior type comparison. It's much more extreme.

RJ is entering his age 24 season. At 23, he averaged 22, 6 and 4 on 39% from three in 32 games with the Raps.

I'm not even sure why you are comparing their career arcs, but at their same age it's pretty obvious who was the better player. Now projecting forward is actually the hard part. No one would believe you that Manu would end up being a down ballot MVP candidate at 25.

Well for one, you're comparing manus rookie season on a team with an already established pecking order containing 2 HOF players, vs a 32 game sample size of RJ with the raps. RJ had 15.5FGA vs 5.8 for Manu, while RJ played 33mpg vs Manus 20mpg. So yeah, his counting stats will be higher. That is an awful comparison to make.

Manu was objectively the better player coming into the league, try not to forget that basketball existed outside the NBA and he was pulling in MVPs and championships before ever even debuting. Manu has tons of experience and accolades when he entered the NBA, you're trying to suggest that RJ is better at the same age based on stats, while ignoring that one was a top 3 pick, and the other was the 57th pick in a draft, and joining a team that won 58 games the season before.

I'm comparing career arcs because nothing about these players suggests any overlap in their play styles and potential career accomplishments exist, aside from them both being lefties.

Dude had to play behind Tony Parker ffs lol.


As per usual your logic is flawed.

By your own crazy logic, Vezenkov is a better player than RJ. That's just non-sense.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1096 » by Scase » Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:36 pm

billy_hoyle wrote:
Scase wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
When you say 'Manu came into the league older', I think it's worth clarifying that he was 25 when he came into the league and averaged 7.6pt, 2, 2 on 34% from 3. It's not a young freshman vs senior type comparison. It's much more extreme.

RJ is entering his age 24 season. At 23, he averaged 22, 6 and 4 on 39% from three in 32 games with the Raps.

I'm not even sure why you are comparing their career arcs, but at their same age it's pretty obvious who was the better player. Now projecting forward is actually the hard part. No one would believe you that Manu would end up being a down ballot MVP candidate at 25.

Well for one, you're comparing manus rookie season on a team with an already established pecking order containing 2 HOF players, vs a 32 game sample size of RJ with the raps. RJ had 15.5FGA vs 5.8 for Manu, while RJ played 33mpg vs Manus 20mpg. So yeah, his counting stats will be higher. That is an awful comparison to make.

Manu was objectively the better player coming into the league, try not to forget that basketball existed outside the NBA and he was pulling in MVPs and championships before ever even debuting. Manu has tons of experience and accolades when he entered the NBA, you're trying to suggest that RJ is better at the same age based on stats, while ignoring that one was a top 3 pick, and the other was the 57th pick in a draft, and joining a team that won 58 games the season before.

I'm comparing career arcs because nothing about these players suggests any overlap in their play styles and potential career accomplishments exist, aside from them both being lefties.

Dude had to play behind Tony Parker ffs lol.


As per usual your logic is flawed.

By your own crazy logic, Vezenkov is a better player than RJ. That's just non-sense.

Except he's 28 and had less accolades coming into the league at an older age, than Manu did at a younger one. Check your own logic before calling someone elses crazy.
Image
Props TZ!
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,873
And1: 3,814
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1097 » by brownbobcat » Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:39 pm

raincityraptors wrote:Y'all need to go watch some tape of Manu and see what he was able to do with his left hand. The ceiling on limited left handed players is different than the ceiling on most limited right handed players because you have to guard them differently than most of the league.

RJ and Darko talk about Manu in reference to RJ's game. I'm sure there is a source for that out there somewhere.

Part of the reason why RJ is now my favorite Raptor is because of how much his game since joining the team reminds me of Manu.

Other than not being great in the mid-range, I don't see much similarity in their game at all. Manu was just so good at contorting his way to the rim and RJ is a lot more robotic in comparison, not to mention being a better outside shooter.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,152
And1: 4,191
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1098 » by Thaddy » Thu Jul 25, 2024 8:08 pm

Barrett has some guard skills, I want to see him operating pick and rolls which he kind of does with the curl action. The passing skills he have need to be looked into more, it's something that's overlooked in his game.
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 20,660
And1: 11,412
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1099 » by MEDIC » Thu Jul 25, 2024 8:34 pm

Thaddy wrote:Barrett has some guard skills, I want to see him operating pick and rolls which he kind of does with the curl action. The passing skills he have need to be looked into more, it's something that's overlooked in his game.


Yeah, his willingness to pass, his vision and his ability to pass have all been a nice surprise. He's definitely a team first guy.

He hasn't been the black hole that he was painted to be.
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,669
And1: 11,037
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1100 » by DreamTeam09 » Thu Jul 25, 2024 9:56 pm

So the man ups his efficiency, but somehow he's the same player as he always was? I don't understand how anyone can say that seriously with a straight face. If he upped his efficiency, then he's a totally different player. "He's only good at C&S 3s and drives", what else do you want from him? Why on earth would u want him to be a mid-range scorer as well... I mean sure it would be nice if he's proficient in that range as well, but that doesn't mean he's not a good player. This was the exact same arguments I heard about the demar era "He takes too many long twos, should focus on driving and corner 3s" that was literally every topic of discussion for 5 yrs, and now we have a player who does those things, and we want him to be a efficient 3 level scorer after just turning 24 a month ago. Give that man a chance...
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust

Return to Toronto Raptors