CHI - LAL - NO - POR

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,487
And1: 2,191
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#1 » by Village Idiot » Fri Jul 26, 2024 12:49 pm

This is pulling together a bunch of disparate pieces from teams needing to complete their off-seasons to align with strategies and ambitions.

Chicago trades:

Zach Lavine
2025 Portland 1st - lottery protected until 2028, then two seconds

Chicago receives:

CJ McCollum
Gabe Vincent

The Bulls do this to cut salary obliagions to Zach Lavine'. They entirely remove a $48 million obligation in 2026-27 due to both McCollum and Vincent's deals expiring in 2026.

LAL trade:

Rui Hachimura
D'Angelo Russell
Gabe Vincent

LA recceives:

Zach Lavine
Kris Murray

LA gets themselves a third star and one who has been an excellent 3 point shooter. This obviously presumes that he has a clean bill of health. The Lakers retain their draft capital as well which they can package, if needed, for additional reinforcements

New Orleans trades:

CJ McCollum

New Orleans receives:

DeAndre Ayton

The Pelicans trade a superfluos guard for a starting center without having to give up any additional assets.

Portland trades:

DeAndre Ayton
Kris Murray

Portland receives:

Rui Hachimura
D'Angelo Russsell
own pick returned from Chicago

Portland clear up its center rotation to get Clingan some playing time and takes a flier on Hachimura. With D'Angelo being an ending contract they also clear $18,692,307 from their cap at the end of the salary year.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
DanishLakerFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 02, 2015
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#2 » by DanishLakerFan » Fri Jul 26, 2024 12:54 pm

No thanks. Not sure he's an offensive upgrade over D'Lo (or even healthy) and he'll give the same problems defensively. And he's the most overpaid player in the league.
User avatar
JeffFosters
Rookie
Posts: 1,022
And1: 237
Joined: Jan 30, 2011
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#3 » by JeffFosters » Fri Jul 26, 2024 12:57 pm

I quite like this. Lavine makes a lot of sense in LA given how he plays and that LBJ has two years left.

I anticipate that NO fans would prefer to keep McCollum (and perhaps just prefer not to receive Ayton).
User avatar
JeffFosters
Rookie
Posts: 1,022
And1: 237
Joined: Jan 30, 2011
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#4 » by JeffFosters » Fri Jul 26, 2024 12:59 pm

DanishLakerFan wrote:No thanks. Not sure he's an offensive upgrade over D'Lo (or even healthy) and he'll give the same problems defensively. And he's the most overpaid player in the league.


Lavine gets a lot of hate on this board but he’s an excellent basketball player. He’s a good shooter, he’s got handles and he’s an excellent decision maker. He was also an above average defender this last season before he got hurt and is a clear defensive upgrade over d-lo.

Lavine playing off-ball with LBJ and AD would be great to watch. Lavine is a great off-ball cutter and I’m not sure there’s a better player to make use of that than LBJ.
DanishLakerFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 02, 2015
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#5 » by DanishLakerFan » Fri Jul 26, 2024 1:17 pm

jarryd3107 wrote:
DanishLakerFan wrote:No thanks. Not sure he's an offensive upgrade over D'Lo (or even healthy) and he'll give the same problems defensively. And he's the most overpaid player in the league.


Lavine gets a lot of hate on this board but he’s an excellent basketball player. He’s a good shooter, he’s got handles and he’s an excellent decision maker. He was also an above average defender this last season before he got hurt and is a clear defensive upgrade over d-lo.

Lavine playing off-ball with LBJ and AD would be great to watch. Lavine is a great off-ball cutter and I’m not sure there’s a better player to make use of that than LBJ.


He's a great offensive player, but he dropped off a bit last season and wasn't any better than D'Lo offensively. As for his defense he's always been horrible and there's no reason to think that's changed. And i dont think the stats back that up either, although it may look like it based on the eye test.
And he's owed a **** of money.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,569
And1: 13,920
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#6 » by JRoy » Fri Jul 26, 2024 1:28 pm

I don’t like this for POR.

No issue with moving Ayton, hope to do better than this.

DLo and Simons together would be enough for me to stop watching the nba.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,976
And1: 2,369
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#7 » by ChettheJet » Fri Jul 26, 2024 1:33 pm

This is so awful for the Bulls you can't understand why they're in it.

Look at Gabe Vincent and Jevon Carter, they're like twins except Vincent makes $5M more than Carter who isn't even in the rotation.

CJM only saves the Bulls about $8M and then one year down the road and he and Vincent don't just maintain the overload the Bulls have at guard already they make it worse. Giddey, White and Dosunmu are signed, younger and who the Bulls are looking for to keep around. Why bring in CJ who is even OLDER than Lavine and almost as injury prone.
User avatar
JeffFosters
Rookie
Posts: 1,022
And1: 237
Joined: Jan 30, 2011
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#8 » by JeffFosters » Fri Jul 26, 2024 2:22 pm

DanishLakerFan wrote:
jarryd3107 wrote:
DanishLakerFan wrote:No thanks. Not sure he's an offensive upgrade over D'Lo (or even healthy) and he'll give the same problems defensively. And he's the most overpaid player in the league.


Lavine gets a lot of hate on this board but he’s an excellent basketball player. He’s a good shooter, he’s got handles and he’s an excellent decision maker. He was also an above average defender this last season before he got hurt and is a clear defensive upgrade over d-lo.

Lavine playing off-ball with LBJ and AD would be great to watch. Lavine is a great off-ball cutter and I’m not sure there’s a better player to make use of that than LBJ.


He's a great offensive player, but he dropped off a bit last season and wasn't any better than D'Lo offensively. As for his defense he's always been horrible and there's no reason to think that's changed. And i dont think the stats back that up either, although it may look like it based on the eye test.
And he's owed a **** of money.


He’s actually not horrible on defense. He’s below average when off ball and above average when on ball. Read this for a bit more info.

https://theswishtheory.com/nba/2024/06/zach-lavine-the-wages-of-perception/

$40m per isn’t actually that much these days, especially considering it comes at the cost of dlo and hachimura. Lavine would be a ~$50m expiring in the season after LBJ’s deal runs out.

The offensive fit of Lavine playing off ball with LBJ and AD is enticing enough for the lakers to think about this.
User avatar
JeffFosters
Rookie
Posts: 1,022
And1: 237
Joined: Jan 30, 2011
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#9 » by JeffFosters » Fri Jul 26, 2024 2:26 pm

ChettheJet wrote:This is so awful for the Bulls you can't understand why they're in it.

Look at Gabe Vincent and Jevon Carter, they're like twins except Vincent makes $5M more than Carter who isn't even in the rotation.

CJM only saves the Bulls about $8M and then one year down the road and he and Vincent don't just maintain the overload the Bulls have at guard already they make it worse. Giddey, White and Dosunmu are signed, younger and who the Bulls are looking for to keep around. Why bring in CJ who is even OLDER than Lavine and almost as injury prone.


Getting off Lavine is worth taking on McCollum, who could be rerouted to a contender for picks and/or assets anyway.

I can’t believe this needs to be said but the decision to get off Lavine does not hinge on whether Vincent fits with Carter.
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,487
And1: 2,191
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#10 » by Village Idiot » Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:04 pm

JRoy wrote:I don’t like this for POR.

No issue with moving Ayton, hope to do better than this.

DLo and Simons together would be enough for me to stop watching the nba.
I imagine Portland would be happy to buy-out Russell and let him go elsewhere.

Personally I really want to clear up the center log-jam and get that pick unencumbered.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,569
And1: 13,920
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#11 » by JRoy » Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:11 pm

Village Idiot wrote:
JRoy wrote:I don’t like this for POR.

No issue with moving Ayton, hope to do better than this.

DLo and Simons together would be enough for me to stop watching the nba.
I imagine Portland would be happy to buy-out Russell and let him go elsewhere.

Personally I really want to clear up the center log-jam and get that pick unencumbered.


I get it, I’m just not convinced there is a logjam at C.

Ayton is starting for now, Clingan will get solid minutes from the bench, Reath is a 3rd string talent who will play sparingly and Williams will be injured.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
meekrab
RealGM
Posts: 13,811
And1: 10,485
Joined: Dec 15, 2014

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#12 » by meekrab » Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:46 pm

jarryd3107 wrote:
DanishLakerFan wrote:
jarryd3107 wrote:
Lavine gets a lot of hate on this board but he’s an excellent basketball player. He’s a good shooter, he’s got handles and he’s an excellent decision maker. He was also an above average defender this last season before he got hurt and is a clear defensive upgrade over d-lo.

Lavine playing off-ball with LBJ and AD would be great to watch. Lavine is a great off-ball cutter and I’m not sure there’s a better player to make use of that than LBJ.


He's a great offensive player, but he dropped off a bit last season and wasn't any better than D'Lo offensively. As for his defense he's always been horrible and there's no reason to think that's changed. And i dont think the stats back that up either, although it may look like it based on the eye test.
And he's owed a **** of money.


He’s actually not horrible on defense. He’s below average when off ball and above average when on ball. Read this for a bit more info.

https://theswishtheory.com/nba/2024/06/zach-lavine-the-wages-of-perception/

$40m per isn’t actually that much these days, especially considering it comes at the cost of dlo and hachimura. Lavine would be a ~$50m expiring in the season after LBJ’s deal runs out.

The offensive fit of Lavine playing off ball with LBJ and AD is enticing enough for the lakers to think about this.

The LaVine trade saga has gone on so long that people talk about Zach like he's a total bum, as if efficient 25 ppg scorers grow on trees and don't get paid big money simply to score points.

He does make total sense for the Lakers and would be the best guard LeBron has played with since Cleveland, but I don't think the Bulls are willing to trade him for what LA can offer, which is why we're seeing these increasingly complicated multi-team deals proposed, that still don't address any of the Bulls' actual roster needs, just the "dump Lavine contract" thing that isn't even an actual need. Playing with Giddey running the offense would be similar to playing with LBJ in that they're both great at finding open shooters, and LaVine is one of the most athletic 40% 3 point shooters in the league, provided his knees aren't Jello after all the surgeries.
DanishLakerFan
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 02, 2015
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#13 » by DanishLakerFan » Fri Jul 26, 2024 6:07 pm

There's a reason no one wants the guy and the market is non-existent/barren according to Woj.

He's flashy on one end but your team doesn't win when he's your guy. Lonzo and Caruso were far better in that regard.

Keep him for gods sake.
GatherStepGuru
Sophomore
Posts: 164
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 23, 2024
         

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#14 » by GatherStepGuru » Fri Jul 26, 2024 6:12 pm

I feel like if all it took was a lottery protected 1st for the Bulls to move off of Lavine, it would’ve been done already and they would’ve resigned Derozan.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,098
And1: 4,361
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#15 » by Tim Lehrbach » Fri Jul 26, 2024 6:35 pm

Easy yes for me from the Portland POV. Doubt NOP (or anybody) wants Ayton.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
User avatar
JeffFosters
Rookie
Posts: 1,022
And1: 237
Joined: Jan 30, 2011
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#16 » by JeffFosters » Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:56 am

meekrab wrote:
jarryd3107 wrote:
DanishLakerFan wrote:
He's a great offensive player, but he dropped off a bit last season and wasn't any better than D'Lo offensively. As for his defense he's always been horrible and there's no reason to think that's changed. And i dont think the stats back that up either, although it may look like it based on the eye test.
And he's owed a **** of money.


He’s actually not horrible on defense. He’s below average when off ball and above average when on ball. Read this for a bit more info.

https://theswishtheory.com/nba/2024/06/zach-lavine-the-wages-of-perception/

$40m per isn’t actually that much these days, especially considering it comes at the cost of dlo and hachimura. Lavine would be a ~$50m expiring in the season after LBJ’s deal runs out.

The offensive fit of Lavine playing off ball with LBJ and AD is enticing enough for the lakers to think about this.

The LaVine trade saga has gone on so long that people talk about Zach like he's a total bum, as if efficient 25 ppg scorers grow on trees and don't get paid big money simply to score points.

He does make total sense for the Lakers and would be the best guard LeBron has played with since Cleveland, but I don't think the Bulls are willing to trade him for what LA can offer, which is why we're seeing these increasingly complicated multi-team deals proposed, that still don't address any of the Bulls' actual roster needs, just the "dump Lavine contract" thing that isn't even an actual need. Playing with Giddey running the offense would be similar to playing with LBJ in that they're both great at finding open shooters, and LaVine is one of the most athletic 40% 3 point shooters in the league, provided his knees aren't Jello after all the surgeries.


I agree on all points. Best bet now is that he plays well in Chicago and rebuilds some trade value.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,490
And1: 43,635
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#17 » by zimpy27 » Sat Jul 27, 2024 1:21 am

Bulls could be cut out..


Lakers get CJ+Reath

Pelicans get Ayton

Blazers get DLo+Rui+pick
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,968
And1: 13,894
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#18 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Jul 27, 2024 1:36 am

zimpy27 wrote:Bulls could be cut out..


Lakers get CJ+Reath

Pelicans get Ayton

Blazers get DLo+Rui+pick


who is sending that pick to blazers
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,490
And1: 43,635
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#19 » by zimpy27 » Sat Jul 27, 2024 1:40 am

Godaddycurse wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Bulls could be cut out..


Lakers get CJ+Reath

Pelicans get Ayton

Blazers get DLo+Rui+pick


who is sending that pick to blazers



Don't know, what would be fair?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,098
And1: 4,361
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: CHI - LAL - NO - POR 

Post#20 » by Tim Lehrbach » Sat Jul 27, 2024 1:41 am

zimpy27 wrote:
Godaddycurse wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Bulls could be cut out..


Lakers get CJ+Reath

Pelicans get Ayton

Blazers get DLo+Rui+pick


who is sending that pick to blazers


Don't know, what would be fair?


Heck, it's fair without a pick.
Clipsz 4 Life

January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006

Saxon

February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007

Return to Trades and Transactions