LAL/POR + LAL/UTA

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

dcstanley
Starter
Posts: 2,333
And1: 1,509
Joined: Nov 20, 2017

LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#1 » by dcstanley » Sun Jul 28, 2024 1:07 pm

LAL trades: Rui, Vincent, Reddish, 2029 LAL FRP, 2025 LAL SRP
POR trades: Grant

LAL trades: DLO, JHS, unprotect 2027 LAL FRP, 2031 LAL FRP
UTA trades: Sexton and Kessler

LAL rotation:
Reaves/Vanderbilt/Grant/Lebron/AD
Sexton/Christie/Knecht/Wood/Kessler

Lakers bolster their championship odds by adding Grant, a versatile forward who can defend and score, fitting well with LeBron and AD. The acquisition of Sexton and Kessler adds depth and youth, strengthening the bench and addressing the hole at back up center.

Jazz secure a 2027 first-round pick and a 2028 pick swap, adding valuable draft capital. Bringing in Russell's expiring contract and JHS offers immediate and future roster options, maintaining their flexibility.

The Blazers pull the trigger on a framework that has been much discussed. They get off Grant's contract and get a future first when the Lakers are likely not competitive. Threw in a second for the Blazers to take on Vincent.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,968
And1: 13,894
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#2 » by Godaddycurse » Sun Jul 28, 2024 1:23 pm

Utah already owns LAL 2027 pick top4 protected.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#3 » by louc1970 » Sun Jul 28, 2024 2:42 pm

If the rumors are true, Utah already turned down 2 FRPs for Kessler.
I would be interested in what value you give each Sexton and Kessler in the trade.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,293
And1: 8,034
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#4 » by Wizenheimer » Sun Jul 28, 2024 2:54 pm

Portland already has 15 players under contract so they'd have to move at least 2 players before the season. Delete Reddish from the deal, at minimum, and the Blazers will need more than a 2nd round pick as incentive to take on Vincent

is that 2029 first LA sends Portland unprotected?
AingesBurner
RealGM
Posts: 15,244
And1: 3,904
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
   

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#5 » by AingesBurner » Sun Jul 28, 2024 4:10 pm

We own that pick already. Unprotect the 27, unprotected 28 swap, and top 3 protected 29 1st
Karmaloop
General Manager
Posts: 9,672
And1: 1,773
Joined: Sep 24, 2009
       

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#6 » by Karmaloop » Sun Jul 28, 2024 4:15 pm

AingesBurner wrote:We own that pick already. Unprotect the 27, unprotected 28 swap, and top 3 protected 29 1st


NOBODY is going to give you that kind of value for Kessler and Sexton.
dcstanley
Starter
Posts: 2,333
And1: 1,509
Joined: Nov 20, 2017

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#7 » by dcstanley » Sun Jul 28, 2024 4:29 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:Portland already has 15 players under contract so they'd have to move at least 2 players before the season. Delete Reddish from the deal, at minimum, and the Blazers will need more than a 2nd round pick as incentive to take on Vincent

is that 2029 first LA sends Portland unprotected?

Needed to include a minimum to make the salaries work. What about LAC's 2025 SRP as well? Vincent isn't total dead money, he can be a useful vet that can provide some POA defense. Would including JHS (as a replacement for Reddish) in lieu of the two 2nds better incentivize POR to take on Vincent?

Top 3 protected.

AingesBurner wrote:We own that pick already. Unprotect the 27, unprotected 28 swap, and top 3 protected 29 1st

I think unprotecting 27 and a protected 31 1st is sufficient value.
AingesBurner
RealGM
Posts: 15,244
And1: 3,904
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
   

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#8 » by AingesBurner » Sun Jul 28, 2024 6:15 pm

dcstanley wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:Portland already has 15 players under contract so they'd have to move at least 2 players before the season. Delete Reddish from the deal, at minimum, and the Blazers will need more than a 2nd round pick as incentive to take on Vincent

is that 2029 first LA sends Portland unprotected?

Needed to include a minimum to make the salaries work. What about LAC's 2025 SRP as well? Vincent isn't total dead money, he can be a useful vet that can provide some POA defense. Would including JHS (as a replacement for Reddish) in lieu of the two 2nds better incentivize POR to take on Vincent?

Top 3 protected.

AingesBurner wrote:We own that pick already. Unprotect the 27, unprotected 28 swap, and top 3 protected 29 1st

I think unprotecting 27 and a protected 31 1st is sufficient value.


Not seeing it as sufficient when we would want the 27 1st unprotected for Sexton and an unprotected pick for Kessler. We could care less about JHS.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,068
And1: 17,586
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#9 » by babyjax13 » Sun Jul 28, 2024 6:22 pm

louc1970 wrote:If the rumors are true, Utah already turned down 2 FRPs for Kessler.
I would be interested in what value you give each Sexton and Kessler in the trade.

They turned down picks that will convey as seconds.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,068
And1: 17,586
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#10 » by babyjax13 » Sun Jul 28, 2024 6:25 pm

I think Utah is still owed value. One first and taking off what little protections are on the 27 pick is a good start, but the rest of the package has no value to us. Afterward we'd have 4 guys on the roster who are primarily point guards
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,098
And1: 3,422
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: LAL/POR + LAL/UTA 

Post#11 » by SkyHook » Sun Jul 28, 2024 6:34 pm

dcstanley wrote:
AingesBurner wrote:We own that pick already. Unprotect the 27, unprotected 28 swap, and top 3 protected 29 1st

I think unprotecting 27 and a protected 31 1st is sufficient value.


Extremely doubtful that the Jazz would agree with you.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."

Return to Trades and Transactions