ImageImageImageImageImage

Official RJ Barrett Thread

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,674
And1: 33,338
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1301 » by YogurtProducer » Wed Jul 31, 2024 1:41 pm

Johnny Bball wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:
:lol: sure it is.


You were wrong at almost every single turn with the FVV, Siakam, Scottie and OG core.

I think this bodes well for me long term wise.


I'm sure you will tell yourself anything to stroke your ego and pretend you're brilliant and nobody else understands.


let him be - he is still clamoring to "being right" about the FVV/Siakam/Scottie/OG core (ignoring that being on the negative side of things in a 30-team league means you are right more than you are wrong).

...but it was just a dick thing for you to type... just since you can't read the room.
ding ding ding. There is a subset of posters here that seem to think people hate their views, but in reality it mostly is just their tone and "holier than thou" schtick that really bothers people. Humble is really young (I think) so he will figure it out. I am a little less optimistic about some more.... tenured posters.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1302 » by Scase » Wed Jul 31, 2024 1:47 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:
CPT wrote:Without reading much of the thread, this was the comparison I was thinking of making. It's not perfect, but I think in terms of strengths, weaknesses, style, overall impact, etc, it's pretty close. I wonder what other people think of it.

From there, two things can be true, even if they contradict each other a bit.

1. I would be absolutely delighted if RJ becomes DeRozan. That's an amazing outcome for any player, let alone one we picked up as filler (arguably a cost) in a trade where we didn't have much leverage.

2. You do not want to lock yourself into a core building around DeMar DeRozan. When it's actually time to win, you know you will have to move off him.

Even if the on-court comparison isn't perfect, it's a pretty good representation of how I feel about RJ, and why I probably lean more negative at times in discussions about his future, role, upside, etc.


Re 2. Why not? That's exactly what we did before. Neither RJ, IQ or Barnes have shown they are on track to be championship core pieces in their current roles. But it seems good enough to be highly competent.

Our previous core started with DeMar-Lowry-Ross-JV. DeMar was upgraded for Kawhi. Ross was upgraded for Ibaka. JV was upgraded for Gasol. Kyle was nearly flipped for Mike Conley Jr. People wasted a lot of time arguing against those players, but they won a lot of games and raised their trade value as a result. They raised the standard of what it took to be a Raptor. I think that's more valuable then synergy or fit, or whatever gets complained about.

But this is exactly what everyone who is "complaining" is saying. People aren't complaining RJ just to complain, they are complaining about specific aspects of his game that indicate the same thing as those players traded, they don't have championship calibre skill sets.

Both IQ and Scottie do. RJ currently is DD with a considerably worse mid range game. I think most everyone who watched the DD years here can unequivocally say he does not possess any championship calibre skills outside his mid range game, and the value of that in the modern NBA is debatable.

The people "complaining" are simply saying the same thing that was said about the traded players, and they were right back then. Time will tell if that is the same case here, but it's not like there isn't precedent, people used to complain about DD's limitations all the time, and they were valid complaints cause they limited the ceiling of the team. So he was traded.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
Johnny Bball
RealGM
Posts: 55,041
And1: 59,440
Joined: Feb 01, 2015
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1303 » by Johnny Bball » Wed Jul 31, 2024 1:50 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
You were wrong at almost every single turn with the FVV, Siakam, Scottie and OG core.

I think this bodes well for me long term wise.


I'm sure you will tell yourself anything to stroke your ego and pretend you're brilliant and nobody else understands.


let him be - he is still clamoring to "being right" about the FVV/Siakam/Scottie/OG core (ignoring that being on the negative side of things in a 30-team league means you are right more than you are wrong).

...but it was just a dick thing for you to type... just since you can't read the room.
ding ding ding. There is a subset of posters here that seem to think people hate their views, but in reality it mostly is just their tone and "holier than thou" schtick that really bothers people. Humble is really young (I think) so he will figure it out. I am a little less optimistic about some more.... tenured posters.



What’s to be right about. Fvv left to an overpay UFA offer that nobody saw coming, OG was never re-signing and forced a trade, and Siakam was then just the last domino that was pointless in keeping. If OG doesn’t insist on going to NY, the probably never trade him or Siakam.
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,600
And1: 52,085
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1304 » by WuTang_CMB » Wed Jul 31, 2024 1:50 pm

For the second straight game, Canada’s leading scorer wasn’t Gilgeous-Alexander or Jamal Murray; it was Barrett, who followed up his 23-point Olympic debut with 24 points on Tuesday, 17 of which came in the second half. In addition to the team’s second-half defensive adjustments, Barrett’s inspired play helped turn the game in the third quarter, where he scored 13 of Canada’s 27 points.

He shot 8-for-14 and hit half of his six three-point attempts. He attacked the rim off the dribble and in transition, got to the line, and hit his free throws – he’s 11-for-12 through two games, an encouraging sign for Raptors fans after he shot 63 per cent from the stripe with Toronto last season.

“I’ve been playing with RJ for a long time, and RJ’s a dog,” said Dort. “He’ll always show up, he’ll always be aggressive. We need him to play like that, so he’s been doing a great job.”

“Yeah, he is that guy,” Fernandez said of Barrett. “Sometimes I don't call plays for him, and he just scores, so that's what he does. Probably, I should be better and call more plays for him. But he finds a way.”

Barrett was perhaps the biggest beneficiary of Andrew Wiggins’ 11th-hour decision to withdraw from training camp – and, yes, according to multiple sources it was his decision, not Golden State’s. Given the similarities, positionally and in terms of skill set, Wiggins would have almost certainly eaten into Barrett’s playing time and touches. Without him, the 24-year-old – and youngest player on Canada’s roster – has owned the role.

It's the perfect situation. With the Raptors, Barrett was often miscast defensively, asked to guard the other team’s best perimeter player after Pascal Siakam was traded and Scottie Barnes got hurt. Having Brooks and Dort next to him helps take that pressure off, while masking some of his shortcomings on that end of the floor and allowing him to thrive offensively, where the mere presence of Gilgeous-Alexander creates opportunities.

“I’m out there with Shai, one of the best players in the world,” Barrett said afterwards. “Just playing with him, the whole team is open because he draws so much attention. So, we’re just really out there trying to help him.”

His 24 points against Australia were the most by a Canadian men’s player at the Olympics since his godfather, Steve Nash, scored 26 in 2000.
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 18,673
And1: 25,754
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1305 » by HumbleRen » Wed Jul 31, 2024 1:59 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
You were wrong at almost every single turn with the FVV, Siakam, Scottie and OG core.

I think this bodes well for me long term wise.


I'm sure you will tell yourself anything to stroke your ego and pretend you're brilliant and nobody else understands.


let him be - he is still clamoring to "being right" about the FVV/Siakam/Scottie/OG core (ignoring that being on the negative side of things in a 30-team league means you are right more than you are wrong).

...but it was just a dick thing for you to type... just since you can't read the room.
ding ding ding. There is a subset of posters here that seem to think people hate their views, but in reality it mostly is just their tone and "holier than thou" schtick that really bothers people. Humble is really young (I think) so he will figure it out. I am a little less optimistic about some more.... tenured posters.


Like I said before, I responded with that energy because I’m being called a hater despite saying nothing truly disrespectful about RJ during this entire discussion.

I’ve yet to see you or Johnny respond to any of my posts with meaningful data or counter points in good faith. You just immediately jumped to calling people haters without even quoting them.

Last 2 pages have people discussing the topic in good faith with each other despite disagreements. That’s how you approach it, not with whatever you and Johnny tried to do.
User avatar
kwajo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,561
And1: 13,322
Joined: Apr 29, 2015
Location: Floating on the Bay of Fundy
     

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1306 » by kwajo » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:04 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:
For the second straight game, Canada’s leading scorer wasn’t Gilgeous-Alexander or Jamal Murray; it was Barrett, who followed up his 23-point Olympic debut with 24 points on Tuesday, 17 of which came in the second half. In addition to the team’s second-half defensive adjustments, Barrett’s inspired play helped turn the game in the third quarter, where he scored 13 of Canada’s 27 points.

He shot 8-for-14 and hit half of his six three-point attempts. He attacked the rim off the dribble and in transition, got to the line, and hit his free throws – he’s 11-for-12 through two games, an encouraging sign for Raptors fans after he shot 63 per cent from the stripe with Toronto last season.

“I’ve been playing with RJ for a long time, and RJ’s a dog,” said Dort. “He’ll always show up, he’ll always be aggressive. We need him to play like that, so he’s been doing a great job.”

“Yeah, he is that guy,” Fernandez said of Barrett. “Sometimes I don't call plays for him, and he just scores, so that's what he does. Probably, I should be better and call more plays for him. But he finds a way.”

Barrett was perhaps the biggest beneficiary of Andrew Wiggins’ 11th-hour decision to withdraw from training camp – and, yes, according to multiple sources it was his decision, not Golden State’s. Given the similarities, positionally and in terms of skill set, Wiggins would have almost certainly eaten into Barrett’s playing time and touches. Without him, the 24-year-old – and youngest player on Canada’s roster – has owned the role.

It's the perfect situation. With the Raptors, Barrett was often miscast defensively, asked to guard the other team’s best perimeter player after Pascal Siakam was traded and Scottie Barnes got hurt. Having Brooks and Dort next to him helps take that pressure off, while masking some of his shortcomings on that end of the floor and allowing him to thrive offensively, where the mere presence of Gilgeous-Alexander creates opportunities.

“I’m out there with Shai, one of the best players in the world,” Barrett said afterwards. “Just playing with him, the whole team is open because he draws so much attention. So, we’re just really out there trying to help him.”

His 24 points against Australia were the most by a Canadian men’s player at the Olympics since his godfather, Steve Nash, scored 26 in 2000.


It's wild that RJ is the youngest player on Team Canada, seems like a great reminder that he still has a long career and time to build skills ahead of him.
"They left them homeless, down and out,
In their crumbling empire"
User avatar
binjumper
Veteran
Posts: 2,670
And1: 3,905
Joined: Oct 02, 2009
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1307 » by binjumper » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:07 pm

Scase wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:
I'm sure you will tell yourself anything to stroke your ego and pretend you're brilliant and nobody else understands.

...but it was just a dick thing for you to type... just since you can't read the room.


Being called a hater for saying nothing disrespectful about RJ will do that. I’m just putting out the same energy I’m receiving.

This has been the case at every turn, say anything negative, you have some sort of slant or agenda. Nothing to do with stating facts, when the feefees get hurt. Same people that defended the same extremely limited players in the past as now. Talking about clear as day limitations isn't allowed, only hiss boom rah cheerleader stuff.

There is no real discourse, it's all just tribalism. It's been seen countless times with any criticism levied at Masai, we've gotta protect all these sweet baby angels.


You should be the last person talking about agendas tbh :lol: Amazing Masai was brought up in the RJ Barrett thread. On cue.
Image
User avatar
Badonkadonk
General Manager
Posts: 7,945
And1: 12,559
Joined: Jul 11, 2012

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1308 » by Badonkadonk » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:16 pm

I was waiting for this piece. Love Folk's use of anonymous scouts and generally his on court analysis. He breaks down the drivers of RJ's bump in performance:

https://www.raptorsrepublic.com/2024/02/22/rj-barrett-is-passing-all-expectations/

Couple of quotes:

Firstly, Barrett is a tremendous fit in Darko Rajakovic’s offense, and said as much: “I’m thankful for the opportunity to be able to showcase that (playstyle) in the offense that we have, a lot of cutting a lot of moving. So yeah, I’m just able to be myself.”

Barrett’s volume of drives hasn’t changed that much with the Raptors as opposed to the Knicks. He’s taking about a drive and a half extra every game. The big change is his efficiency on drives (54% shooting with the Raptors vs. 38% with the Knicks) which is impacted greatly by better decision making – which is easy to highlight with the pass-percentage on his drives changing from 27-percent with the Knicks to 38-percent with the Raptors. Barrett is forcing less shots at the rim. With that pass-percentage going up, we’ve seen a wider range of passes from Barrett, and more consistently. Who would have thought Barrett was the best skip passer coming over in the OG trade?
Image
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,020
And1: 68,363
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1309 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:22 pm

% of FGs attempted by distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .278
TOR: .431 (+55% Increase)

3-10 FT
NYK: .255
TOR: .293 (+15% Increase)

10-16 FT
NYK: .093
TOR: .028 (-70% Decrease)

16-3PT
NYK: .039
TOR: .004 (-90% Decrease)

3PT:
NYK: .335
TOR: .244 (-27% Decrease)


FG% by Distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .620
TOR: .731

3-10 FT
NYK: .374
TOR: .451

10-16 FT
NYK: .306
TOR: .286

16-3PT
NYK: .400
TOR: .500

3PT:
NYK: .331
TOR: .392


Overall TS%, 23/24:

NYK: .536
TOR: .615
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 18,673
And1: 25,754
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1310 » by HumbleRen » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:26 pm

OakleyDokely wrote:% of FGs attempted by distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .278
TOR: .431 (+55% Increase)

3-10 FT
NYK: .255
TOR: .293 (+15% Increase)

10-16 FT
NYK: .093
TOR: .028 (-70% Decrease)

16-3PT
NYK: .039
TOR: .004 (-90% Decrease)

3PT:
NYK: .335
TOR: .244 (-27% Decrease)


FG% by Distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .620
TOR: .731

3-10 FT
NYK: .374
TOR: .451

10-16 FT
NYK: .306
TOR: .286

16-3PT
NYK: .400
TOR: .500

3PT:
NYK: .331
TOR: .392


Overall TS%, 23/24:

NYK: .536
TOR: .615


His 2% leap seems legit IMO. Nothing seems outlierish from the eye test. His 3’s will come and go, I don’t really believe in that shot at all but I highly doubt he’ll suddenly revert to being an atrocious 2% point maker again.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1311 » by Scase » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:28 pm

Badonkadonk wrote:I was waiting for this piece. Love Folk's use of anonymous scouts and generally his on court analysis. He breaks down the drivers of RJ's bump in performance:

https://www.raptorsrepublic.com/2024/02/22/rj-barrett-is-passing-all-expectations/

Couple of quotes:

Firstly, Barrett is a tremendous fit in Darko Rajakovic’s offense, and said as much: “I’m thankful for the opportunity to be able to showcase that (playstyle) in the offense that we have, a lot of cutting a lot of moving. So yeah, I’m just able to be myself.”

Barrett’s volume of drives hasn’t changed that much with the Raptors as opposed to the Knicks. He’s taking about a drive and a half extra every game. The big change is his efficiency on drives (54% shooting with the Raptors vs. 38% with the Knicks) which is impacted greatly by better decision making – which is easy to highlight with the pass-percentage on his drives changing from 27-percent with the Knicks to 38-percent with the Raptors. Barrett is forcing less shots at the rim. With that pass-percentage going up, we’ve seen a wider range of passes from Barrett, and more consistently. Who would have thought Barrett was the best skip passer coming over in the OG trade?


OakleyDokely wrote:% of FGs attempted by distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .278
TOR: .431 (+55% Increase)

3-10 FT
NYK: .255
TOR: .293 (+15% Increase)

10-16 FT
NYK: .093
TOR: .028 (-70% Decrease)

16-3PT
NYK: .039
TOR: .004 (-90% Decrease)

3PT:
NYK: .335
TOR: .244 (-27% Decrease)


FG% by Distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .620
TOR: .731

3-10 FT
NYK: .374
TOR: .451

10-16 FT
NYK: .306
TOR: .286

16-3PT
NYK: .400
TOR: .500

3PT:
NYK: .331
TOR: .392


Overall TS%, 23/24:

NYK: .536
TOR: .615


This stuff passes the eye test and is backed up by the stats, it's the main reason I can't write off last year entirely. Still need to see it for a whole season, and I expect those numbers to come down a bit, but I definitely expect him to be more efficient than when he was in NYC based off the short stint with us last year.

Signs are there that some of that improvement is likely to carry over, the question is, how much.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,020
And1: 68,363
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1312 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:34 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:% of FGs attempted by distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .278
TOR: .431 (+55% Increase)

3-10 FT
NYK: .255
TOR: .293 (+15% Increase)

10-16 FT
NYK: .093
TOR: .028 (-70% Decrease)

16-3PT
NYK: .039
TOR: .004 (-90% Decrease)

3PT:
NYK: .335
TOR: .244 (-27% Decrease)


FG% by Distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .620
TOR: .731

3-10 FT
NYK: .374
TOR: .451

10-16 FT
NYK: .306
TOR: .286

16-3PT
NYK: .400
TOR: .500

3PT:
NYK: .331
TOR: .392


Overall TS%, 23/24:

NYK: .536
TOR: .615


His 2% leap seems legit IMO. Nothing seems outlierish from the eye test. His 3’s will come and go, I don’t really believe in that shot at all but I highly doubt he’ll suddenly revert to being an atrocious 2% point maker again.


I think his 3PT% shot will depend mostly on shot quality/quantity. The number of attempts he took in TOR went down, but if he's mostly taking open, good 3pt shots, a higher % is sustainable for him I think. He was probably given a little too much perimeter shot creation on the Knicks and that dragged down his shot quality.
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 18,673
And1: 25,754
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1313 » by HumbleRen » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:37 pm

OakleyDokely wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:% of FGs attempted by distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .278
TOR: .431 (+55% Increase)

3-10 FT
NYK: .255
TOR: .293 (+15% Increase)

10-16 FT
NYK: .093
TOR: .028 (-70% Decrease)

16-3PT
NYK: .039
TOR: .004 (-90% Decrease)

3PT:
NYK: .335
TOR: .244 (-27% Decrease)


FG% by Distance, 23/24:

0-3 FT
NYK: .620
TOR: .731

3-10 FT
NYK: .374
TOR: .451

10-16 FT
NYK: .306
TOR: .286

16-3PT
NYK: .400
TOR: .500

3PT:
NYK: .331
TOR: .392


Overall TS%, 23/24:

NYK: .536
TOR: .615


His 2% leap seems legit IMO. Nothing seems outlierish from the eye test. His 3’s will come and go, I don’t really believe in that shot at all but I highly doubt he’ll suddenly revert to being an atrocious 2% point maker again.


I think his 3PT% shot will depend mostly on shot quality/quantity. The number of attempts he took in TOR went down, but if he's mostly taking open, good 3pt shots, a higher % is sustainable for him I think. He was probably given a little too much perimeter shot creation on the Knicks and that dragged down his shot quality.


The on court geometry for him has probably changed so much as well.

Playing with 2 lefties who are ball dominate probably did not produce any good driving windows for him.
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 34,051
And1: 31,588
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1314 » by WaltFrazier » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:55 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
His 2% leap seems legit IMO. Nothing seems outlierish from the eye test. His 3’s will come and go, I don’t really believe in that shot at all but I highly doubt he’ll suddenly revert to being an atrocious 2% point maker again.


I think his 3PT% shot will depend mostly on shot quality/quantity. The number of attempts he took in TOR went down, but if he's mostly taking open, good 3pt shots, a higher % is sustainable for him I think. He was probably given a little too much perimeter shot creation on the Knicks and that dragged down his shot quality.


The on court geometry for him has probably changed so much as well.

Playing with 2 lefties who are ball dominate probably did not produce any good driving windows for him.


Yeah he seems to thrive in Darko's cutting offense. And was not a good fit with Thibs more iso offense because he and Randle did the same things.

Hard to picture him ever being moved, as some here post, because of the local hero angle. And also he might not thrive anywhere else like he does with Darko.
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 34,051
And1: 31,588
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1315 » by WaltFrazier » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:03 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:

He shot 8-for-14 and hit half of his six three-point attempts. He attacked the rim off the dribble and in transition, got to the line, and hit his free throws – he’s 11-for-12 through two games, an encouraging sign for Raptors fans after he shot
Barrett was perhaps the biggest beneficiary of Andrew Wiggins’ 11th-hour decision to withdraw from training camp – and, yes, according to multiple sources it was his decision, not Golden State’s. Given the similarities, positionally and in terms of skill set, Wiggins would have almost certainly eaten into Barrett’s playing time and touches. Without him, the 24-year-old – and youngest player on Canada’s roster – has owned the role.


OT for this thread but very disappointed to read that about Wiggins, if true. No slight on RJ but it would have been great to have an athletic slasher like Wiggins as well, the depth would have been amazing. Of course I'm thinking of the Wiggins who starred in the GSW championship including guarding Tatum so well.
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,674
And1: 33,338
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1316 » by YogurtProducer » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:03 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:
I'm sure you will tell yourself anything to stroke your ego and pretend you're brilliant and nobody else understands.


let him be - he is still clamoring to "being right" about the FVV/Siakam/Scottie/OG core (ignoring that being on the negative side of things in a 30-team league means you are right more than you are wrong).

...but it was just a dick thing for you to type... just since you can't read the room.
ding ding ding. There is a subset of posters here that seem to think people hate their views, but in reality it mostly is just their tone and "holier than thou" schtick that really bothers people. Humble is really young (I think) so he will figure it out. I am a little less optimistic about some more.... tenured posters.


Like I said before, I responded with that energy because I’m being called a hater despite saying nothing truly disrespectful about RJ during this entire discussion.

I’ve yet to see you or Johnny respond to any of my posts with meaningful data or counter points in good faith. You just immediately jumped to calling people haters without even quoting them.

Last 2 pages have people discussing the topic in good faith with each other despite disagreements. That’s how you approach it, not with whatever you and Johnny tried to do.

Claiming people who disagree with you "Don't understand basketball" is NOT a good faith argument.

I have nothing else to add here. I like RJ, I thought he was gonna be bad when we got him, and he has so far proven me wrong. There is good reason to believe his new found efficiency could sustain (23YO, 3rd pick, major change in playstyle in TOR vs NYK), etc.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,674
And1: 33,338
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1317 » by YogurtProducer » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:05 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
His 2% leap seems legit IMO. Nothing seems outlierish from the eye test. His 3’s will come and go, I don’t really believe in that shot at all but I highly doubt he’ll suddenly revert to being an atrocious 2% point maker again.


I think his 3PT% shot will depend mostly on shot quality/quantity. The number of attempts he took in TOR went down, but if he's mostly taking open, good 3pt shots, a higher % is sustainable for him I think. He was probably given a little too much perimeter shot creation on the Knicks and that dragged down his shot quality.


The on court geometry for him has probably changed so much as well.

Playing with 2 lefties who are ball dominate probably did not produce any good driving windows for him.

This lefty narrative is so **** weird to me :lol:

Not once in my life have I ever read about 90% of basketball teams with 5 righties claim someone struggled due to all those other righties out there :lol:
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,674
And1: 33,338
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1318 » by YogurtProducer » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:08 pm

Johnny Bball wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Johnny Bball wrote:
I'm sure you will tell yourself anything to stroke your ego and pretend you're brilliant and nobody else understands.


let him be - he is still clamoring to "being right" about the FVV/Siakam/Scottie/OG core (ignoring that being on the negative side of things in a 30-team league means you are right more than you are wrong).

...but it was just a dick thing for you to type... just since you can't read the room.
ding ding ding. There is a subset of posters here that seem to think people hate their views, but in reality it mostly is just their tone and "holier than thou" schtick that really bothers people. Humble is really young (I think) so he will figure it out. I am a little less optimistic about some more.... tenured posters.



What’s to be right about. Fvv left to an overpay UFA offer that nobody saw coming, OG was never re-signing and forced a trade, and Siakam was then just the last domino that was pointless in keeping. If OG doesn’t insist on going to NY, the probably never trade him or Siakam.
I guess "right" in terms of that the core was not a championship core (again, ignoring that no one really ever argued that without some improvements it ever was).

So let him "be right". A ton of those guys (cannot even remember if Ren was one of them) never actually cared to figure out what the other sides opinion was anyways and often they made up arguments that no one was making. They just saw that people were not on the"FVV SUCKS! WE NEED TO TANK" train and immediately just made assumptions about what the other side(s) actually wanted.

So sure, he was right. Good job.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1319 » by Scase » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:11 pm

WaltFrazier wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:
I think his 3PT% shot will depend mostly on shot quality/quantity. The number of attempts he took in TOR went down, but if he's mostly taking open, good 3pt shots, a higher % is sustainable for him I think. He was probably given a little too much perimeter shot creation on the Knicks and that dragged down his shot quality.


The on court geometry for him has probably changed so much as well.

Playing with 2 lefties who are ball dominate probably did not produce any good driving windows for him.


Yeah he seems to thrive in Darko's cutting offense. And was not a good fit with Thibs more iso offense because he and Randle did the same things.

Hard to picture him ever being moved, as some here post, because of the local hero angle. And also he might not thrive anywhere else like he does with Darko.

Minus the local part, that was the shared thought on DD tbf, hopefully Masai learned from the Siakam/OG/FVV situation and doesn't get overly attached to anyone. If an upgrade can be had, they should be movable. As for him fitting elsewhere, that's the problem for the receiving team, our FO just needs to sell his value and rake them across the coals for a return.
Image
Props TZ!
PoundTown
Starter
Posts: 2,068
And1: 1,379
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#1320 » by PoundTown » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:12 pm

Scase wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:
CPT wrote:Without reading much of the thread, this was the comparison I was thinking of making. It's not perfect, but I think in terms of strengths, weaknesses, style, overall impact, etc, it's pretty close. I wonder what other people think of it.

From there, two things can be true, even if they contradict each other a bit.

1. I would be absolutely delighted if RJ becomes DeRozan. That's an amazing outcome for any player, let alone one we picked up as filler (arguably a cost) in a trade where we didn't have much leverage.

2. You do not want to lock yourself into a core building around DeMar DeRozan. When it's actually time to win, you know you will have to move off him.

Even if the on-court comparison isn't perfect, it's a pretty good representation of how I feel about RJ, and why I probably lean more negative at times in discussions about his future, role, upside, etc.


Re 2. Why not? That's exactly what we did before. Neither RJ, IQ or Barnes have shown they are on track to be championship core pieces in their current roles. But it seems good enough to be highly competent.

Our previous core started with DeMar-Lowry-Ross-JV. DeMar was upgraded for Kawhi. Ross was upgraded for Ibaka. JV was upgraded for Gasol. Kyle was nearly flipped for Mike Conley Jr. People wasted a lot of time arguing against those players, but they won a lot of games and raised their trade value as a result. They raised the standard of what it took to be a Raptor. I think that's more valuable then synergy or fit, or whatever gets complained about.

But this is exactly what everyone who is "complaining" is saying. People aren't complaining RJ just to complain, they are complaining about specific aspects of his game that indicate the same thing as those players traded, they don't have championship calibre skill sets.

Both IQ and Scottie do. RJ currently is DD with a considerably worse mid range game. I think most everyone who watched the DD years here can unequivocally say he does not possess any championship calibre skills outside his mid range game, and the value of that in the modern NBA is debatable.

The people "complaining" are simply saying the same thing that was said about the traded players, and they were right back then. Time will tell if that is the same case here, but it's not like there isn't precedent, people used to complain about DD's limitations all the time, and they were valid complaints cause they limited the ceiling of the team. So he was traded.


Okay, I'll bite. If Demar had a championship caliber midrange game, then RJ has a championship caliber slashing game. The dude can just get to the paint and get to the line, and has to be top 10 wing in the game at that skill now. That's RJ's elite skill. You don't get to 23, 6, 4 on 55 percent from the field being a jack of all trades, master of none. He is a master at bulldozing his way to the hoop.

If you look at RJ as a championship caliber 3rd option, which I think he can be, and his contract currently warrants then you realize, this teams success is more about Scottie and IQ becoming a 1 and a 2, or more than likely you have to make a trade to get Scottie the 1A, to his 1B. I see RJ as kind of a prime Caron Butler, Antawn Jamison, Richard Jefferson level player impact wise. Might make an all star or two, but probably just a slight teir below that, but still a bucket and a gamer who will show up when it matters. I see IQ as a prime Jason Terry level impact player maybe sans a little edge that JT played with, and JT was the second best scorer on a championship team that just had good players up and down the roster with great team chemistry and bball IQ on both ends, and obviously prime Dirk. So, this team has a long way to go, and we really need to improve depth and defensively.

Return to Toronto Raptors