BI for JERAMI

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Syko_boB
Junior
Posts: 320
And1: 91
Joined: Jan 23, 2019
 

BI for JERAMI 

Post#1 » by Syko_boB » Fri Aug 2, 2024 4:41 am

pause


Blazers send:

Jerami Grant
Duop Reath
27 NYK 2nd + 28 GSW 2nd



Pelicans send:

Brandon Ingram



POR gets 4 years younger & a bit more versatile with BI's vision and ballhandling, at a price they can afford to extend with so many rookie deals locked in



NOP lock in a more affordable piece in Grant who's range (40% from deep) can open lanes for their main attractions & be a great compliment to their lengthy defensive wings, while Reath can be the real prize & end up having a major role
free palestine
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 13,918
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#2 » by JRoy » Fri Aug 2, 2024 4:43 am

Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,629
And1: 4,416
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#3 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Fri Aug 2, 2024 5:00 am

JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


Which one has the cap space to take him? Only Houston is projected to have room and from what we've seen this offseason, players are not just automatically getting a pay increase because they want one
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,057
And1: 5,694
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#4 » by winforlose » Fri Aug 2, 2024 5:31 am

BI won’t have much of a market until the trade deadline. Injuries may create a demand for a rental with a possibility of more depending on how he plays up till then. At this point the money he wants with the new CBA makes him very difficult to move, much less for value.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,457
And1: 2,207
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#5 » by Norm2953 » Fri Aug 2, 2024 5:40 am

This would allow Portland to clear a lot of cap space by the summer of 2026 when they
could allow Simons and Ayton to walk but then again, Portland is not a free agent destination
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,487
And1: 43,630
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#6 » by zimpy27 » Fri Aug 2, 2024 6:19 am

JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


Plenty of glamor in Portland
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,427
And1: 7,164
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#7 » by giberish » Fri Aug 2, 2024 6:41 am

JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


I'd be shocked if he chose glamor over getting paid.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,064
And1: 17,579
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#8 » by babyjax13 » Fri Aug 2, 2024 7:34 am

I really like this, outside the box and probably shouldn't be. Portland rolls the dice on someone who could be part of their long-term core. Worst case they are out some seconds and the opportunity cost of the asset Grant could bring in. But, they will also have cap space sooner in that scenario, which likely has a similar value to what Grant would pull in a trade. For New Orleans, it gives them a manageable way to retain talent (I think).
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 3,471
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#9 » by Decipher » Fri Aug 2, 2024 9:12 am

UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


Which one has the cap space to take him? Only Houston is projected to have room and from what we've seen this offseason, players are not just automatically getting a pay increase because they want one


Brooklyn
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,685
And1: 9,242
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#10 » by Dez » Fri Aug 2, 2024 9:31 am

JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


You're getting out of paying Grant's contract and taking a flier on Ingram.

There is zero reason for Portland to say no.
BuddyBuckets
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,342
And1: 1,052
Joined: Jan 23, 2019
 

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#11 » by BuddyBuckets » Fri Aug 2, 2024 10:17 am

Grant doesn't fill a need. Pels pass, would rather Ayton
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,098
And1: 4,361
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#12 » by Tim Lehrbach » Fri Aug 2, 2024 11:21 am

BuddyBuckets wrote:Grant doesn't fill a need. Pels pass, would rather Ayton

Done!
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,098
And1: 4,361
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#13 » by Tim Lehrbach » Fri Aug 2, 2024 11:23 am

If Ingram has value, send him to a third team for something Portland wants, like a pick and filler. I don't think he's the right piece for the Blazers.
Clipsz 4 Life

January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006

Saxon

February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,930
And1: 5,998
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#14 » by R-DAWG » Fri Aug 2, 2024 12:31 pm

JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


Looking at the landscape of the league, are we sure a glamor market max offer for Ingram will exist.

I think the better question for Portland is if Ingram signed to an extension is with more in the trade market than Grant on his current deal.
YayBasketball
Junior
Posts: 403
And1: 140
Joined: Apr 26, 2024

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#15 » by YayBasketball » Fri Aug 2, 2024 12:35 pm

Tim Lehrbach wrote:If Ingram has value, send him to a third team for something Portland wants, like a pick and filler. I don't think he's the right piece for the Blazers.

Exactly. One overlooked aspect of the Ingram trade dreams is-- the rebuilding (tanking) teams won't want to trade for him because he will make them better (in theory). Those 10+ more wins he could being could be just enough to keep them out of the top 5 in this loaded Flagg-led draft, but still not good enough to compete with the top of the West.

Blazers, Pistons, Nets, Hornets, Wizards, Bulls, Raptors, Spurs, maybe Jazz-- they won't risk giving up assets for the chance to miss out on Flagg, etc. and to overpay Ingram. Now, mid-season, one of these teams could have a great early start like the Pacers last season. Then want to buy talent and start a winning culture, then trade for Ingram at the deadline to boost their playoff run and long term outlook. I could see the Hornets being that team.
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,629
And1: 4,416
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#16 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Fri Aug 2, 2024 12:56 pm

Decipher wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
JRoy wrote:Zero interest in an expiring Ingram that will 100% choose a glamor market.


Which one has the cap space to take him? Only Houston is projected to have room and from what we've seen this offseason, players are not just automatically getting a pay increase because they want one


Brooklyn


Don’t see the point in that if they’re rebuilding
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
Decipher
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 3,471
Joined: May 13, 2022
 

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#17 » by Decipher » Fri Aug 2, 2024 1:02 pm

UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Decipher wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Which one has the cap space to take him? Only Houston is projected to have room and from what we've seen this offseason, players are not just automatically getting a pay increase because they want one


Brooklyn


Don’t see the point in that if they’re rebuilding


Neither do I but they can do it
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,321
And1: 18,441
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#18 » by BBallFreak » Fri Aug 2, 2024 1:35 pm

This is just awkward imo.

Grant doesn't have the value to return Ingram as I see Grant as slightly positive to neutral value, but Portland shouldn't pursue Ingram as he's not a needle mover and the actual value this need to add wouldn't make sense.

I would think both teams should pass.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#19 » by HartfordWhalers » Fri Aug 2, 2024 2:13 pm

I have Ingram worth more by enough that I think NO passes. But maybe as a three teamer there is a variation that works.
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,659
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: BI for JERAMI 

Post#20 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Fri Aug 2, 2024 3:29 pm

BBallFreak wrote:This is just awkward imo.

Grant doesn't have the value to return Ingram as I see Grant as slightly positive to neutral value, but Portland shouldn't pursue Ingram as he's not a needle mover and the actual value this need to add wouldn't make sense.

I would think both teams should pass.

Portland says yes on value alone imo . Can always trade him. Ingram younger than grant. Not like grant a better fit for them long team.

Return to Trades and Transactions