durden_tyler wrote:Pachinko_ wrote:durden_tyler wrote:
Aside from the money, there is the question of competitiveness. Only until they get hurt (losing the WC, etc) that they actually send the best teams and in recent years, looks like every four years (Olympics) is fine establishing or reestablishing the supposed dominance. So you are correct, the Americans are not changing their playstyle and/or how they compose the teams (though appears this year, they are willing to add role players) until the international teams are consistent threats to the crown.
I'm not talking about the way they compose the teams or competing with the Europeans. There is no competition, the Europeans could become twice as good as the Americans and still they would lose for the simple reason that American States are united as one team and European States aren't, their good players are scettered across 20 different national teams.
I'm talking about the NBA being forced to adopt some of the good aspects of European basketball, like refereeing the game properly like Duffman100 said. It's not gonna happen no matter what happens in the Olympics. The NBA sells really well as it is and therefore it's not going to change, it's a star driven league and the fans pay to see their stars score a million points uninterrupted by such petty details like basketball rules, period.
Point taken. So yeah, while the FIBA/Euro game is faster, some rules are better (goaltend on missed shots, 5 fouls) refs better (maybe, they all know the spread too, and they favor the home/established teams as seen in the France-Japan and Spain-Nigeria games) there is near zero chance the NBA adapts to the FIBA game because simply they don't have to change it.
i can see FIBA adapting to the NBA rules if it comes to that. LOL
The EuroLeague already wanted to change to the NBA sized court and the NBA 3 point line, but FIBA blocked it. FIBA has no control over the EuroLeague, but the EuroLeague regulations go by whatever the international rules are. So even though the EuroLeague made those changes, if FIBA doesn't agree to it, then they keep the same rules, to not have different rules, like the NBA does.
However, the EuroLeague did not want to add the defensive 3 seconds, and said they would never adopt such a rule.
On FIBA's side, they said they were open to eventually adopting the changes the EuroLeague wanted, and might go to the NBA court size and 3 point line, but they won't do so until it's economically feasible for all of the clubs around the world to be able to change their arena seating layouts and their courts.
However, like the EuroLeague, FIBA said that they would never adopt a rule like the defensive 3 seconds. FIBA then later also reaffirmed that, after the NBA block of FIBA's voting committee proposed to add the defensive 3 seconds rule to FIBA. FIBA heads again said they would never consider such a rule.
So the NBA size court and the NBA 3 point line are likely going to be adopted by FIBA, but they are not going to adopt the defensive 3 seconds rule, as it is considered to be very anti-sportive pretty much everywhere outside of the US and Canada.