CDM_Stats wrote:clyde21 wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:
Tend to agree.. its usually hard to build around one way players. Good enough to not make you the worst too
Warriors offer to Ainge should be shrinking as time goes on, and it shouldnt be that big to begin with
you can call him a one way player but the last two years in Utah he has a +10 On/Off and a +9.6 On/Off, and that was the highest out of anyone relevant on the team by a decent margin. he makes them better for sure and if Ainge decided to keep him until the deadline that's probably a 4 or 5 extra wins that he didn't need or want.
that's our leverage point and we should squeeze it.
He is a one way player and he is still a needle mover, the problem is, like I said - one-way players are tough to build around, but are still good enough to make you a late lotto team
If I'm MDJ, I'm imposing my own repeater tax on Ainge - every time I repeat my offer, it goes down
That's my negotiation style too. Screw Ainge.










