cdubbz wrote:There's already online arguments on how Caitlin Clark & Angel Reese are both rated 90 overall in the game lol. Brink, Cardoso, & Jackson are all 80 overall rating.
All this is good imo. Its the outside chatter that happens in the men's game with fans and now we have fans caring about WNBA ratings?! Who would have thought.
Right!?? The fact that people are arguing about this is great
I really think I'm gonna buy the game just for the ladies. I really hope they put as much detail into the W side of the game as the men got or I will feel ripped off. I'm gonna wait til I see some reviews from WNBA fans first.
Now, personally, I think 2K was being overly generous by giving CC and Angel 90s. Rookies shouldn't be ranked that high imo even though both of them are having historical rookie campaigns. If anything, mid to lower 80s for both, since they are both flawed and have things to work on.
I would have given Angel an 82, and CC an 84. Angel's rebounding and defense are elite, CC's handle and passing are elite. I think that's a good overall score.
The rest of the rookies should be in the 70s imo. Jackson might be in the low 80s if we're being generous. 80 at best. Brink and Cardoso should not be rated that high (Brink's shot blocking would give her a big boost though).
A'ja being 99 is the only rating I agree with. She is the top dog.
I would rank Stewie and Phee the same tbh, at 96. I don't think Griner is a 94 at this point.
Please consider donating blood:
https://www.nybc.org/2025-2026 Indiana Pacers C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
