UcanUwill wrote:LaLover11 wrote:UcanUwill wrote:
Personally, I think you overrate Lakers players. Knicks with Brunson is just a far better team that what you proposing, this is a league where the team with best guy usually wins, and Brunson is top 10 guy in the league, not many teams have a betterguy than that. What is Knicks with Reaves, Hart, OG, Randle, Robinson and 12 mil? Its just a treadmill team, just a bunch of nothing.
You can disagree but Reaves and Vando would actually help give rest to all players.
They can play small or big with a smart IQ player that will play team ball and get the whole team going.
New York is known for hustle basketball playing with teamwork
Reaves, Hart, OG, Randle, Robinson, McBride, Donte, Vando is Better than just having Brunson.
You can even throw in Gabe to Backup Reaves/Hart
Hart literally broke apart because he was playing 48 minutes a game, c'mon let's be honest now
Hustle players are key to success but you also need a superstar to create offense. Put just hustle guys and they go nowhere, that is just reality of the league. I know Austin Reaves is talented offensively, but he is not Brunson, he is not number one guy in the NBA.
the key to knicks and brunsons' success is teamchemistry first an foremost. you cannot just put reaves on the team.
its laughable that someone actually thinks that reaves and vando would net better results. i would suggest not to entertain this kind of trolling. its kinda obvious. speaks for the basketball knowledge of the person breaking it all down
either way, this trade is never gonna happen because everybody knows brunson is much more valuable than any of the lakers players aside from AD and Lebron.































