ImageImage

Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,771
And1: 417
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#41 » by Butter » Fri Jul 26, 2024 6:33 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:Simons is in that tier of guys that includes Herro, DLo, Poole, Clarkson - hell even LaVine could be in this bucket. Offensive only guards who are not creators, are not defenders, are not 'do the little things' guys. I wouldnt be surprised if we cant find a FRP offer for Simons right now. The devaluation of guys with his skillset on top of the general lack of teams around the league having the right salary ballast and team needs for a pure scoring SG are pretty obvious.



Your post is hitting on the original focus of this entire thread. What is the relative VALUE of Blazers players? Cost divided by production.


Ant $25 vs Clarkson $14M
https://fanspo.com/nba/compare-players/jordan-clarkson-203903/anfernee-simons-1629014

Ant $25 vs DRus $18M
https://fanspo.com/nba/compare-players/d'angelo-russell-1626156/anfernee-simons-1629014

Ant $25M vs Herro $30M
https://fanspo.com/nba/compare-players/tyler-herro-1629639/anfernee-simons-1629014

Ant $25M vs Poole $32M
https://fanspo.com/nba/compare-players/jordan-poole-1629673/anfernee-simons-1629014

Ant $25M vs Lavine $43M
https://fanspo.com/nba/compare-players/zach-lavine-203897/anfernee-simons-1629014
Rip City, baby!!!!
GEE
Starter
Posts: 2,416
And1: 369
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#42 » by GEE » Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:17 pm

I like Simons more than any of those scrubs you mentioned, including the ones that cost far more... and I firmly believe that it's quite possible that Cronin may as well. Hell... I think it's even possible that Cronin actually adores Simons and has ZERO desire to trade Simons at all.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,476
And1: 10,030
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#43 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:57 pm

GEE wrote:I like Simons more than any of those scrubs you mentioned, including the ones that cost far more... and I firmly believe that it's quite possible that Cronin may as well. Hell... I think it's even possible that Cronin actually adores Simons and has ZERO desire to trade Simons at all.


lol.

There is no statistical argument that Simons and Herro are anything but basically the same player.

To call those guys all scrubs but Simons some prize is homer thinking at it’s best.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,186
And1: 3,723
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#44 » by zzaj » Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:06 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
zzaj wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:I see little chance anyone on the roster outside Grant is moved prior to the season. I just dont see a market for Simons or Ayton - and I also am not convinced the FO even has either on the block.


I agree with your valuations...but I disagree that there's even a slim chance Grant is moved prior to the season--for no other reason than there is nobody on the roster that Grant is keeping "development" time from. Or at least nobody that the Blazers probably view as the future starting PF for the team. Camara is probably closest to fitting that bill, and IIRC played the majority of his minutes at the 4 last year...but he plays like a natural SF, and likely his best role will be coming off the bench behind Deni.

I think it's much more likely that nobody gets traded before the start of the season (as you say), and Grant and Simons get traded at the deadline.


Ya I can see that. I was thinking specifically LAL regarding Grant. I see no other teams really in play prior to the season starting.

If LAL is down for a deal where the meat of the trade is basically Grant for Rui and a pick - I take that and run. Rui is younger, decent and the FO can spin him as a 'young player with potential' to justify what really is a trade of Grant for a FRP. I think that face saving is something the current managment would hold as valuable. They want people to keep coming to games and burning a 20ppg guy like Grant just for ballast and a FRP will be hard to spin. I think Rui gives them someone to lean on to help justify a lose-now move of trading Grant.

But realistically, I dont see LAL making the move. And the whispers that Cronin is asking for 2 FRP for Grant basically make any Grant deal unworkable as no team in their right mind would do such a trade.



I don't really see any incentive for Cronin to trade Grant to the Lakers for Rui and a first rounder, unless that first rounder is post-Lebron.
Rui is likely not a future starter in the NBA and likely has less trade value than Grant. It's helpful for Deni and Scoot to have a 40% 3pt shooter to pass to--especially for a team that was last in 3pt% in the NBA last year--Grant by all accounts wants to be in Portland, there is nobody he's blocking in terms of development, and he's not going to contribute very much to the W column. The Blazers are under the apron, so his money doesn't really affect the team that way. I also think the "must fit the age timeline" narrative is largely overblown...

I think it's fine for Cronin to wait to trade Grant until it's obvious who his successor is going to be (hopefully via draft next year). Does that lessen Grant's value? Probably a little bit, but if the reality of the return is a single first rounder then Grant will fetch that pretty much any time...no need to do it exactly right now.

Trading Grant to the Lakers would also be Cronin helping a WC team...and I'm not sure that "help" would ever be reciprocated during Cronin's tenure as GM.

Simons is another story altogether. While it would be very impactful to lose his 3pt shooting and on-ball self creation, he's also going to be sending one of Scoot or Sharpe to the bench, which IS a pretty big issue if you're trying to evaluate if Scoot or Sharpe are 100% starting cornerstones going forward. He's also hinted at wanted to "win" at this stage of his career...getting ANY value for him now, before he pulls a Lillard is probably the smart move.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,771
And1: 417
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#45 » by Butter » Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:11 pm

zzaj wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
zzaj wrote:
I agree with your valuations...but I disagree that there's even a slim chance Grant is moved prior to the season--for no other reason than there is nobody on the roster that Grant is keeping "development" time from. Or at least nobody that the Blazers probably view as the future starting PF for the team. Camara is probably closest to fitting that bill, and IIRC played the majority of his minutes at the 4 last year...but he plays like a natural SF, and likely his best role will be coming off the bench behind Deni.

I think it's much more likely that nobody gets traded before the start of the season (as you say), and Grant and Simons get traded at the deadline.


Ya I can see that. I was thinking specifically LAL regarding Grant. I see no other teams really in play prior to the season starting.

If LAL is down for a deal where the meat of the trade is basically Grant for Rui and a pick - I take that and run. Rui is younger, decent and the FO can spin him as a 'young player with potential' to justify what really is a trade of Grant for a FRP. I think that face saving is something the current managment would hold as valuable. They want people to keep coming to games and burning a 20ppg guy like Grant just for ballast and a FRP will be hard to spin. I think Rui gives them someone to lean on to help justify a lose-now move of trading Grant.

But realistically, I dont see LAL making the move. And the whispers that Cronin is asking for 2 FRP for Grant basically make any Grant deal unworkable as no team in their right mind would do such a trade.



I don't really see any incentive for Cronin to trade Grant to the Lakers for Rui and a first rounder, unless that first rounder is post-Lebron.
Rui is likely not a future starter in the NBA and likely has less trade value than Grant. It's helpful for Deni and Scoot to have a 40% 3pt shooter to pass to--especially for a team that was last in 3pt% in the NBA last year--Grant by all accounts wants to be in Portland, there is nobody he's blocking in terms of development, and he's not going to contribute very much to the W column. I also think the "must fit the age timeline" narrative is largely overblown...

I think it's fine for Cronin to wait to trade Grant until it's obvious who his successor is going to be (hopefully via draft next year). Does that lessen Grant's value? Probably a little bit, but if the reality of the return is a single first rounder then Grant will fetch that pretty much any time...no need to do it exactly right now.

Trading Grant to the Lakers would also be Cronin helping a WC team...and I'm not sure that "help" would ever be reciprocated during Cronin's tenure as GM.

Simons is another story altogether. While it would be very impactful to lose his 3pt shooting and on-ball self creation, he's also going to be sending one of Scoot or Sharpe to the bench, which IS a pretty big issue if you're trying to evaluate if Scoot or Sharpe are 100% starting cornerstones going forward. He's also hinted at wanted to "win" at this stage of his career...getting ANY value for him now, before he pulls a Lillard is probably the smart move.


I'd love to see Blazers players that other fans claim are over-rated traded to other possible tank competitors to help them win more games
Rip City, baby!!!!
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,186
And1: 3,723
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#46 » by zzaj » Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:35 pm

Butter wrote:
zzaj wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
Ya I can see that. I was thinking specifically LAL regarding Grant. I see no other teams really in play prior to the season starting.

If LAL is down for a deal where the meat of the trade is basically Grant for Rui and a pick - I take that and run. Rui is younger, decent and the FO can spin him as a 'young player with potential' to justify what really is a trade of Grant for a FRP. I think that face saving is something the current managment would hold as valuable. They want people to keep coming to games and burning a 20ppg guy like Grant just for ballast and a FRP will be hard to spin. I think Rui gives them someone to lean on to help justify a lose-now move of trading Grant.

But realistically, I dont see LAL making the move. And the whispers that Cronin is asking for 2 FRP for Grant basically make any Grant deal unworkable as no team in their right mind would do such a trade.



I don't really see any incentive for Cronin to trade Grant to the Lakers for Rui and a first rounder, unless that first rounder is post-Lebron.
Rui is likely not a future starter in the NBA and likely has less trade value than Grant. It's helpful for Deni and Scoot to have a 40% 3pt shooter to pass to--especially for a team that was last in 3pt% in the NBA last year--Grant by all accounts wants to be in Portland, there is nobody he's blocking in terms of development, and he's not going to contribute very much to the W column. I also think the "must fit the age timeline" narrative is largely overblown...

I think it's fine for Cronin to wait to trade Grant until it's obvious who his successor is going to be (hopefully via draft next year). Does that lessen Grant's value? Probably a little bit, but if the reality of the return is a single first rounder then Grant will fetch that pretty much any time...no need to do it exactly right now.

Trading Grant to the Lakers would also be Cronin helping a WC team...and I'm not sure that "help" would ever be reciprocated during Cronin's tenure as GM.

Simons is another story altogether. While it would be very impactful to lose his 3pt shooting and on-ball self creation, he's also going to be sending one of Scoot or Sharpe to the bench, which IS a pretty big issue if you're trying to evaluate if Scoot or Sharpe are 100% starting cornerstones going forward. He's also hinted at wanted to "win" at this stage of his career...getting ANY value for him now, before he pulls a Lillard is probably the smart move.


I'd love to see Blazers players that other fans claim are over-rated traded to other possible tank competitors to help them win more games


You mean like Brogdon? lol
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,771
And1: 417
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#47 » by Butter » Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:25 am

zzaj wrote:
Butter wrote:
zzaj wrote:

I don't really see any incentive for Cronin to trade Grant to the Lakers for Rui and a first rounder, unless that first rounder is post-Lebron.
Rui is likely not a future starter in the NBA and likely has less trade value than Grant. It's helpful for Deni and Scoot to have a 40% 3pt shooter to pass to--especially for a team that was last in 3pt% in the NBA last year--Grant by all accounts wants to be in Portland, there is nobody he's blocking in terms of development, and he's not going to contribute very much to the W column. I also think the "must fit the age timeline" narrative is largely overblown...

I think it's fine for Cronin to wait to trade Grant until it's obvious who his successor is going to be (hopefully via draft next year). Does that lessen Grant's value? Probably a little bit, but if the reality of the return is a single first rounder then Grant will fetch that pretty much any time...no need to do it exactly right now.

Trading Grant to the Lakers would also be Cronin helping a WC team...and I'm not sure that "help" would ever be reciprocated during Cronin's tenure as GM.

Simons is another story altogether. While it would be very impactful to lose his 3pt shooting and on-ball self creation, he's also going to be sending one of Scoot or Sharpe to the bench, which IS a pretty big issue if you're trying to evaluate if Scoot or Sharpe are 100% starting cornerstones going forward. He's also hinted at wanted to "win" at this stage of his career...getting ANY value for him now, before he pulls a Lillard is probably the smart move.


I'd love to see Blazers players that other fans claim are over-rated traded to other possible tank competitors to help them win more games


You mean like Brogdon? lol


Exactly. Cronin is going to Game of Thrones his way to the #1 pick
Rip City, baby!!!!
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,476
And1: 10,030
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#48 » by BlazersBroncos » Sat Jul 27, 2024 3:21 am

zzaj wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
zzaj wrote:
I agree with your valuations...but I disagree that there's even a slim chance Grant is moved prior to the season--for no other reason than there is nobody on the roster that Grant is keeping "development" time from. Or at least nobody that the Blazers probably view as the future starting PF for the team. Camara is probably closest to fitting that bill, and IIRC played the majority of his minutes at the 4 last year...but he plays like a natural SF, and likely his best role will be coming off the bench behind Deni.

I think it's much more likely that nobody gets traded before the start of the season (as you say), and Grant and Simons get traded at the deadline.


Ya I can see that. I was thinking specifically LAL regarding Grant. I see no other teams really in play prior to the season starting.

If LAL is down for a deal where the meat of the trade is basically Grant for Rui and a pick - I take that and run. Rui is younger, decent and the FO can spin him as a 'young player with potential' to justify what really is a trade of Grant for a FRP. I think that face saving is something the current managment would hold as valuable. They want people to keep coming to games and burning a 20ppg guy like Grant just for ballast and a FRP will be hard to spin. I think Rui gives them someone to lean on to help justify a lose-now move of trading Grant.

But realistically, I dont see LAL making the move. And the whispers that Cronin is asking for 2 FRP for Grant basically make any Grant deal unworkable as no team in their right mind would do such a trade.



I don't really see any incentive for Cronin to trade Grant to the Lakers for Rui and a first rounder, unless that first rounder is post-Lebron.
Rui is likely not a future starter in the NBA and likely has less trade value than Grant. It's helpful for Deni and Scoot to have a 40% 3pt shooter to pass to--especially for a team that was last in 3pt% in the NBA last year--Grant by all accounts wants to be in Portland, there is nobody he's blocking in terms of development, and he's not going to contribute very much to the W column. The Blazers are under the apron, so his money doesn't really affect the team that way. I also think the "must fit the age timeline" narrative is largely overblown...

I think it's fine for Cronin to wait to trade Grant until it's obvious who his successor is going to be (hopefully via draft next year). Does that lessen Grant's value? Probably a little bit, but if the reality of the return is a single first rounder then Grant will fetch that pretty much any time...no need to do it exactly right now.

Trading Grant to the Lakers would also be Cronin helping a WC team...and I'm not sure that "help" would ever be reciprocated during Cronin's tenure as GM.

Simons is another story altogether. While it would be very impactful to lose his 3pt shooting and on-ball self creation, he's also going to be sending one of Scoot or Sharpe to the bench, which IS a pretty big issue if you're trying to evaluate if Scoot or Sharpe are 100% starting cornerstones going forward. He's also hinted at wanted to "win" at this stage of his career...getting ANY value for him now, before he pulls a Lillard is probably the smart move.


Any LAL pick would be after LBJ. And I would demand Top-4 protection. Not lotto protection.

As for keeping grant around because he isn’t blocking anyone, he is also helping us win games for no reason. Scoot showed last year he isn’t a plug and play franchise guy. If he met expectations I could see taking a ‘surround the elite young talent with vets and max his development’ strategy - as SAS is doing.

We don’t have a young guy that warrants that approach. We need more swings at a true franchise guy. When that guy lands on your team, you are going to know it in your gut by the end of his first season 9/10 times.

I don’t think we have that guy. It’s just my feel on the team. We need to max our chances of finding him. Grant hurts that chance.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,186
And1: 3,723
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#49 » by zzaj » Sat Jul 27, 2024 5:04 am

BlazersBroncos wrote:
zzaj wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
Ya I can see that. I was thinking specifically LAL regarding Grant. I see no other teams really in play prior to the season starting.

If LAL is down for a deal where the meat of the trade is basically Grant for Rui and a pick - I take that and run. Rui is younger, decent and the FO can spin him as a 'young player with potential' to justify what really is a trade of Grant for a FRP. I think that face saving is something the current managment would hold as valuable. They want people to keep coming to games and burning a 20ppg guy like Grant just for ballast and a FRP will be hard to spin. I think Rui gives them someone to lean on to help justify a lose-now move of trading Grant.

But realistically, I dont see LAL making the move. And the whispers that Cronin is asking for 2 FRP for Grant basically make any Grant deal unworkable as no team in their right mind would do such a trade.



I don't really see any incentive for Cronin to trade Grant to the Lakers for Rui and a first rounder, unless that first rounder is post-Lebron.
Rui is likely not a future starter in the NBA and likely has less trade value than Grant. It's helpful for Deni and Scoot to have a 40% 3pt shooter to pass to--especially for a team that was last in 3pt% in the NBA last year--Grant by all accounts wants to be in Portland, there is nobody he's blocking in terms of development, and he's not going to contribute very much to the W column. The Blazers are under the apron, so his money doesn't really affect the team that way. I also think the "must fit the age timeline" narrative is largely overblown...

I think it's fine for Cronin to wait to trade Grant until it's obvious who his successor is going to be (hopefully via draft next year). Does that lessen Grant's value? Probably a little bit, but if the reality of the return is a single first rounder then Grant will fetch that pretty much any time...no need to do it exactly right now.

Trading Grant to the Lakers would also be Cronin helping a WC team...and I'm not sure that "help" would ever be reciprocated during Cronin's tenure as GM.

Simons is another story altogether. While it would be very impactful to lose his 3pt shooting and on-ball self creation, he's also going to be sending one of Scoot or Sharpe to the bench, which IS a pretty big issue if you're trying to evaluate if Scoot or Sharpe are 100% starting cornerstones going forward. He's also hinted at wanted to "win" at this stage of his career...getting ANY value for him now, before he pulls a Lillard is probably the smart move.


Any LAL pick would be after LBJ. And I would demand Top-4 protection. Not lotto protection.

As for keeping grant around because he isn’t blocking anyone, he is also helping us win games for no reason. Scoot showed last year he isn’t a plug and play franchise guy. If he met expectations I could see taking a ‘surround the elite young talent with vets and max his development’ strategy - as SAS is doing.

We don’t have a young guy that warrants that approach. We need more swings at a true franchise guy. When that guy lands on your team, you are going to know it in your gut by the end of his first season 9/10 times.

I don’t think we have that guy. It’s just my feel on the team. We need to max our chances of finding him. Grant hurts that chance.


I’m not really disagreeing…

Grant had a whopping 2.7 total win shares last year. So if keeping him around till the deadline or the Blazers land his replacement happens, I won’t be too worried.

Even with Grant, the Blazers are likely to have the worst record in the West next season. And maaaaybe there are a couple teams in the East that will be worst. Regardless, the Blazers would still almost certainly land in the Top 5 in the 2025 draft with Grant on the roster.
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,262
And1: 4,296
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#50 » by JasonStern » Sun Aug 4, 2024 11:21 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
Butter wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:I agree with TL that often discussions get bogged down around here (and elsewhere) about comparative trade values. The weird thing about that is we don't know what a player's trade value is unless he's traded, and even then ancillary parts of a trade can make that confusing

I think it's safe to say that the Blazer veterans: Grant-Ant-Ayton-Thybulle-Timelord are at most, role-playing members of a supporting cast for a good team. Not really good 3rd options but more like 4th options. The only player of that 5 that might actually alter a good team's trajectory is a healthy Timelord, and that player might not ever be

generically, I'd estimate that Grant probably has the most value; or at least be valued by the most teams because he's a wing that has been shooting 40% on three's for a couple of seasons. Wings are probably the most coveted players

The best role for Simons is as a 6th man and I'd say that's obvious. I'm not sure how many teams would be looking to have a 26M/year 6th man though. However many it is I'd think it would be more than the teams looking at Simons as a starter

Ayton's flaws and salary probably make him difficult to move


Good discussion points. And I think the Celtics have proven 2 thing:

1- championship teams need more than a Big 3
2- teams are going to have to spend big to get those players

I somewhat disagree that the Blazers are 4th best on all teams, but maybe you're right (see #1 above).

I have also come to terms that your description of Simons is probably right. I've compared him to Vinny Johnson in other threads, that may be the case.

My instinct is that the Blazers will stick with Ayton through the end of his contract. And out of all the current large contract vets, I'm ok with him starting while Clingan develops.

The big problem with all of this is that the Blazers will likely have to wait till closer to the trade deadline to move the vets, which will impact their Capture the Flagg campaign.

Cronin is probably a year too late to move some of these jokers.


IMO, Cronin made the mess with a series of blunders last summer....

* he did not have to trade for Ayton but apparently has wanted him for a couple of seasons. I count that as a mistake he made a little worse by investing a 7th pick in a backup for Ayton

* Cronin could have routed Timelord to another team, IMO, even if it was just for a couple of 2nd's. Of all the teams in the NBA, Portland is the last team that should have traded for an injury-prone big man

* Cronin did not need to sign Grant to that 5 year/160M deal. No other team would have given him a 5 years deal and no other team would have given him more than 20M/year

* Cronin did not have to match the offer sheet to Thybulle. That was utterly stupid and it hamstrings Portland's cap/tax option this year, and next year

* and after being around for longer than Olshey, Cronin should have recognized the fallacy of investing heavily in yet another undersized, no-defense starting SG like Simons. Portland failed with CJ in that role for 7 years. Now it looks like they will fail with Simons in that role for the 10th straight season

IMO, Cronin's 2023 off-season wasn't as big a disater as Olshey's 2016 off-season, but it's looking pretty bad right now


Ayton wasn't a mistake. It was a gamble. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. The Blazers needed to eat some salary in the Dame trade, and taking a former #1 pick was how they did it. And you're overlooking all of the other draft capital and pieces that came in the Dame trade. And even then, he still put up 16ppg/11rpg.
"But they were empty stats!"
What does that even mean? The points still count. And the rebounds gave the team extra possessions.

Simons is going nowhere. The Brogdon trade confirmed that we're all-in on the undersized SG. If Sharpe and Scoot can beat him out, the narrative changes. But at this point, that's just wishful thinking that hasn't proven itself on the court.

I'm not sure Timelord lands any 2nd round picks. He's just too injury prone and hasn't played in nearly a year.

Thybulle can be moved easy enough. He's a proven role player. Just don't expect some huge return.

I honestly cannot defend the Grant contract. Hopefully Portland gets lucky and some team is desperate and trades an asset for him. No disrespect to Grant. He just doesn't fit the timeline and is vastly overpaid.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,289
And1: 1,275
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#51 » by Walton1one » Mon Aug 5, 2024 12:07 am

Simons is going to leave POR, let’s not relive the Aldridge free agency experience. He has been here for 7? Years, he wants to win and this team, even if they “capture the Flagg” are not going to be there in the next 2 years.

Do you want to pay him $40+ m a year? Or repeat the Grant contract (paying way above market value)? In the hopes of keeping him?

The clock is ticking on Simons and the more time goes by, the less value POR will get in return for him.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,771
And1: 417
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#52 » by Butter » Wed Aug 7, 2024 2:40 am

Rip City, baby!!!!
GEE
Starter
Posts: 2,416
And1: 369
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#53 » by GEE » Wed Aug 7, 2024 7:40 pm

Awesome... Now do Scoot vs. Green :D
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,262
And1: 4,296
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#54 » by JasonStern » Wed Aug 21, 2024 2:49 pm

Walton1one wrote:Simons is going to leave POR, let’s not relive the Aldridge free agency experience. He has been here for 7? Years, he wants to win and this team, even if they “capture the Flagg” are not going to be there in the next 2 years.


Source? Every player wants to win. It's really just a few posters on this board that are hoping that the Blazers go 0-82.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,289
And1: 1,275
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#55 » by Walton1one » Wed Aug 21, 2024 4:59 pm

Well I mean the source is Simons himself isn’t it? He literally said he is tired of losing and wants to win. This POR team will not be “winning “\sniffing the playoffs for a few years at best, even if they get the #1 pick next year.

So do you think a guy who is tired of losing, who has been here eight years, 28? by the time is contract is up, is going to willingly sign on for more? Not unless he’s getting paid an obscene amount of money to do so, which would not the best interest of the franchise

We have seen this movie (LA) before haven’t we? When a player puts out comments like that in public, mgmt should take it seriously, should they not?

If Cronin wants to overpay Simons ($40+ mil/yr?) like he did Grant to keep him here, that would be a whole other level of stupidity Especially for a one way, undersized player, best suited as a 6th man, who is literally one of the worst defensive players in the entire NBA.

@JasonStern - appreciate your posts, good discussion, just disagree on value of Simons, I see see him as a decent player but overvalued here.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,580
And1: 1,286
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#56 » by tester551 » Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:22 am

Walton1one wrote:Well I mean the source is Simons himself isn’t it? He literally said he is tired of losing and wants to win. This POR team will not be “winning “\sniffing the playoffs for a few years at best, even if they get the #1 pick next year.

So do you think a guy who is tired of losing, who has been here eight years, 28? by the time is contract is up, is going to willingly sign on for more? Not unless he’s getting paid an obscene amount of money to do so, which would not the best interest of the franchise

We have seen this movie (LA) before haven’t we? When a player puts out comments like that in public, mgmt should take it seriously, should they not?

If Cronin wants to overpay Simons ($40+ mil/yr?) like he did Grant to keep him here, that would be a whole other level of stupidity Especially for a one way, undersized player, best suited as a 6th man, who is literally one of the worst defensive players in the entire NBA.

@JasonStern - appreciate your posts, good discussion, just disagree on value of Simons, I see see him as a decent player but overvalued here.

Simons wants to win, but his skill set (or lack thereof) is a big factor in the Blazer's records the last few years.

He's a net-negative player when on the court. I don't see that changing much moving to another team.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,476
And1: 10,030
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#57 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Aug 22, 2024 2:44 pm

Simons is a 6th man on a contender - is he ready to take that role?
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,988
And1: 14,331
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#58 » by JRoy » Thu Aug 22, 2024 3:45 pm

tester551 wrote:
Walton1one wrote:Well I mean the source is Simons himself isn’t it? He literally said he is tired of losing and wants to win. This POR team will not be “winning “\sniffing the playoffs for a few years at best, even if they get the #1 pick next year.

So do you think a guy who is tired of losing, who has been here eight years, 28? by the time is contract is up, is going to willingly sign on for more? Not unless he’s getting paid an obscene amount of money to do so, which would not the best interest of the franchise

We have seen this movie (LA) before haven’t we? When a player puts out comments like that in public, mgmt should take it seriously, should they not?

If Cronin wants to overpay Simons ($40+ mil/yr?) like he did Grant to keep him here, that would be a whole other level of stupidity Especially for a one way, undersized player, best suited as a 6th man, who is literally one of the worst defensive players in the entire NBA.

@JasonStern - appreciate your posts, good discussion, just disagree on value of Simons, I see see him as a decent player but overvalued here.

Simons wants to win, but his skill set (or lack thereof) is a big factor in the Blazer's records the last few years.

He's a net-negative player when on the court. I don't see that changing much moving to another team.


True, but then he is another team’s problem.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,239
And1: 3,167
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#59 » by PDXKnight » Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:05 pm

JRoy wrote:
tester551 wrote:
Walton1one wrote:Well I mean the source is Simons himself isn’t it? He literally said he is tired of losing and wants to win. This POR team will not be “winning “\sniffing the playoffs for a few years at best, even if they get the #1 pick next year.

So do you think a guy who is tired of losing, who has been here eight years, 28? by the time is contract is up, is going to willingly sign on for more? Not unless he’s getting paid an obscene amount of money to do so, which would not the best interest of the franchise

We have seen this movie (LA) before haven’t we? When a player puts out comments like that in public, mgmt should take it seriously, should they not?

If Cronin wants to overpay Simons ($40+ mil/yr?) like he did Grant to keep him here, that would be a whole other level of stupidity Especially for a one way, undersized player, best suited as a 6th man, who is literally one of the worst defensive players in the entire NBA.

@JasonStern - appreciate your posts, good discussion, just disagree on value of Simons, I see see him as a decent player but overvalued here.

Simons wants to win, but his skill set (or lack thereof) is a big factor in the Blazer's records the last few years.

He's a net-negative player when on the court. I don't see that changing much moving to another team.


True, but then he is another team’s problem.


If he could accept a 6th man role he'd probably fix his problem. Otherwise, meh
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,988
And1: 14,331
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Blazers Players: Comparison / Trade Value 

Post#60 » by JRoy » Thu Aug 22, 2024 4:07 pm

PDXKnight wrote:
JRoy wrote:
tester551 wrote:Simons wants to win, but his skill set (or lack thereof) is a big factor in the Blazer's records the last few years.

He's a net-negative player when on the court. I don't see that changing much moving to another team.


True, but then he is another team’s problem.


If he could accept a 6th man role he'd probably fix his problem. Otherwise, meh


Too many warts, want him gone.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers