MrDollarBills wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
She's a grown woman, not a child. She doesn't need anyone's protection.
The NBA does their best to protect their stars, who are grown ass men, so not sure why the WNBA would be any different.
I guess they could go the Old Skool route and teams can get enforcers to protect their own, but that seems like a pretty stupid marketing strategy unless you think injured stars and fights breaking out during games is good for the league.
I don’t, personally.
What does the NBA do to protect their stars? Everyone is gonna get fouled, I've seen LeBron get absolutely hammered over the years. There are no special protections, but common rules that apply to EVERYONE:
If someone gets hard fouled, a review is initiated, flagrant fouls are handed out and the league levies fines or suspensions. The WNBA is no different. That's the system. Why should that change?
I've seen next to nothing happen to CC that even remotely comes close to the violence I've seen Draymond Green hand out towards his peers over the last decade and he's been dealt with accordingly. Every time she gets hit people act like it's a crime against humanity and it's honestly bizarre. Did people start watching basketball this year?
What kind of policy do you want? Automatic ejections for fouling Caitlin Clark? Should she wear a no contact jersey like how NFL QBs do in practice? Seriously, what do you want the league to do?
This is basketball. No one is advocating for violence nor has anything that has happened on the court even remotely been so egregious that it warrants a heavy handed response. I've seen A'ja Wilson nearly get her face smashed in this season in a way that would have had you upset if CC got hit in the face like that, and guess what? no one cared.
A'ja is the best player in the world right now. If she can take a hard foul and keep going, why should CC be treated any differently? Come on now. The W is physical but yall are acting like Clark is getting body slammed in mid air. No, that actually happened to Angel Reese months ago and no one cared.
I'm sorry. I know people are protective of her, but she is not a child or some precious little princess that can't be touched. This blatant infantilization of Caitlin Clark is just weird guys and it undermines her as an athlete.
I don't want to see Lebron or Jokic taken out by cheap shots either, does that mean I'm infantilizing them and treating them like
a princess and undermining them as an athlete?
Honestly that take is what's weird to me. I want to watch basketball, not MMA. I don't think I'm breaking news here by saying that cheap shots lead to injuries and fights.
And that goes for Wilson and other stars of the WNBA too. I'm an Aces fan, so you better believe I want the league to protect her, and I think it's the right thing to do.
Now maybe you disagree. There are a lot of fans who are still nostalgic for '80s basketball, stuff like when McHale clotheslined Rambis in the Finals. But the league determined it was bad for the game, and I agree. You asked what the league has done to protect their stars, are you not familiar with the Jordan Rules? The Pistons were known for beating the hell out of MJ in the '80s, and by the '90s you couldn't get away with that stuff.
Whether you like it or not, the stars of the game are cash cows and a smart company is going to protect their biggest money makers. Don't be surprised if Clark gets a little more protection from the league next season is all I'm saying.
And it doesn't need to be something extreme like in your silly strawman examples -- "Automatic ejections for fouling Caitlin Clark? Should she wear a no contact jersey like how NFL QBs do in practice?" -- but just enforcing existing rules tighter.
Clark was flagrantly fouled 3 times in the last 2 games, and last night the 2 flagrant fouls were only upgraded upon review.
The first foul was an obvious landing zone violation on Cardoso, but Clark had to make a scene to get the refs to look at it. Steph gets that call automatically every time.
The second one was a body check from behind in the open court, with no play on the ball. Super dangerous, and I've seen fights break out in pickup games over less.
You asked if I just started watching basketball this year, but have you played the game, like, ever? You telling me you'd be cool with being ran down from behind and body checked to the floor?
I'd be heated, and most ballers I know would too. It's completely unnecessary and not even remotely a basketball play.
Anyway, to me that's a clear flagrant 2 and ejection, especially given the context. DeShields checked in and fouled her 3 times in quick succession in a blowout, the last one being the most egregious. The refs are too stupid to recognize what's going on there in real time?
You can also look at the Carter body check from earlier in the season, deemed a common foul. She ran up on her from behind, called her a bitch, and body checked Clark when the ball wasn't even in play.
That's a common foul?
Give me an example of something like that being called a common foul in the modern NBA, especially if the person being fouled is a star like Lebron. You can't because NBA refs wouldn't allow that, and they shouldn't.
I get that you like seeing the chippiness and cheap shots, but they are against the rules and the league would be morons to continue allowing stars to get targeted with cheap shots, any stars, not just Clark.
The chippiness may have been a big part of the game in the past, but there was a lot less skill to market in the past too. Now they can market the basketball, and doing that means protecting the stars of the league.
And I hope they start doing it soon, rather than waiting for a player like Clark, Stewie, Wilson, etc. to sustain an injury before acting.