Image ImageImage Image

Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024

Moderators: HomoSapien, RedBulls23, Payt10, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, DASMACKDOWN, fleet, GimmeDat, Michael Jackson

Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,801
And1: 2,897
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#461 » by Betta Bulleavit » Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:27 pm

madvillian wrote:It's criminal to be running so many plays for Reese when in reality Cardoso is the more talented offensive player by a mile. Reese is a black hole whereas Cardoso sees doubles early and can even sometimes make a skip pass.

I found it telling that with the game over the Sky ran a play to try and get a Reese a desperation three to try and keep her double double streak alive.

Are they trying to win and make the playoffs or are they trying to pad Reese's stats? You can't do both. It's one or the other.

No, that’s not what happened at all. That play wasn’t run to get Reese a 3 pointer. The play was to get Reese the ball on the inbound so that she could pass it back to a shooter. But the Mystics broke it up.
madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 22,602
And1: 9,478
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#462 » by madvillian » Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:19 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
madvillian wrote:It's criminal to be running so many plays for Reese when in reality Cardoso is the more talented offensive player by a mile. Reese is a black hole whereas Cardoso sees doubles early and can even sometimes make a skip pass.

I found it telling that with the game over the Sky ran a play to try and get a Reese a desperation three to try and keep her double double streak alive.

Are they trying to win and make the playoffs or are they trying to pad Reese's stats? You can't do both. It's one or the other.

No, that’s not what happened at all. That play wasn’t run to get Reese a 3 pointer. The play was to get Reese the ball on the inbound so that she could pass it back to a shooter. But the Mystics broke it up.


that's not at all what I saw, but it doesn't matter. Reese was brutal down the stretch including jogging back on defense to allow a layup, blowing a contested shot with two people wide open at the three point line, and turning it over constantly all game. She also led the team in minutes. The coach isn't doing anybody any good pretending she's some juggernaut. She's a nice rebounder, that's about it.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,801
And1: 2,897
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#463 » by Betta Bulleavit » Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:45 pm

madvillian wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:
madvillian wrote:It's criminal to be running so many plays for Reese when in reality Cardoso is the more talented offensive player by a mile. Reese is a black hole whereas Cardoso sees doubles early and can even sometimes make a skip pass.

I found it telling that with the game over the Sky ran a play to try and get a Reese a desperation three to try and keep her double double streak alive.

Are they trying to win and make the playoffs or are they trying to pad Reese's stats? You can't do both. It's one or the other.

No, that’s not what happened at all. That play wasn’t run to get Reese a 3 pointer. The play was to get Reese the ball on the inbound so that she could pass it back to a shooter. But the Mystics broke it up.


that's not at all what I saw, but it doesn't matter. Reese was brutal down the stretch including jogging back on defense to allow a layup, blowing a contested shot with two people wide open at the three point line, and turning it over constantly all game. She also led the team in minutes. The coach isn't doing anybody any good pretending she's some juggernaut. She's a nice rebounder, that's about it.

Last night’s game was a mess in general and it wasn’t just Reese. They were sloppy from top to bottom and I think that the idea that Reese is being artificially pumped up by her coach is ridiculous. I’ve watched all but 4 games this season and I haven’t seen that at all. It’s reached a point where some people are just seeing what they want to see.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,338
And1: 10,486
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#464 » by nomorezorro » Thu Aug 29, 2024 7:36 pm

i think it's a fair criticism of reese to say there have been moments where it feels like she's straining to get her numbers, and moments where it feels like she's loafing because she knows it doesn't show up in the box score. but those moments aren't particularly commonplace, and she's got such a high motor most of the time that it's hard to be too harsh on her for occasionally letting up or making a selfish play. and then when people act like there's a team-wide conspiracy to try to make angel look good...it's detached from reality, yeah

i think people are struggling to understand the context that reese is playing in — namely, that there are next to no offensive creators on the sky, and for all those possessions you see her clumsily drive to the hoop to force a bricked layup, there are just as many plays when she's not involved or on the bench and the ball just stagnates. if the team is leaning too heavily on reese for any reason, it's because they can't rely on anyone else other than chennedy to put pressure on a defense. i think kamilla has a ton of potential, but she's still really passive and doesn't look totally comfortable operating with the ball in her hands (plus barely anyone on the team is capable of making an entry pass). basically everyone else just flat-out stinks.

the team is running out the clock until they can restore the roster with capable players, so you won't really be able to judge how angel actually plays as a member of a functioning team until next year at the earliest
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,801
And1: 2,897
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#465 » by Betta Bulleavit » Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:56 pm

nomorezorro wrote:i think it's a fair criticism of reese to say there have been moments where it feels like she's straining to get her numbers, and moments where it feels like she's loafing because she knows it doesn't show up in the box score. but those moments aren't particularly commonplace, and she's got such a high motor most of the time that it's hard to be too harsh on her for occasionally letting up or making a selfish play. and then when people act like there's a team-wide conspiracy to try to make angel look good...it's detached from reality, yeah

i think people are struggling to understand the context that reese is playing in — namely, that there are next to no offensive creators on the sky, and for all those possessions you see her clumsily drive to the hoop to force a bricked layup, there are just as many plays when she's not involved or on the bench and the ball just stagnates. if the team is leaning too heavily on reese for any reason, it's because they can't rely on anyone else other than chennedy to put pressure on a defense. i think kamilla has a ton of potential, but she's still really passive and doesn't look totally comfortable operating with the ball in her hands (plus barely anyone on the team is capable of making an entry pass). basically everyone else just flat-out stinks.

the team is running out the clock until they can restore the roster with capable players, so you won't really be able to judge how angel actually plays as a member of a functioning team until next year at the earliest


To add to this, I do feel like Angel could pass out of her ORBs more rather than going up against 2 defenders, knowing that she’s not a strong finisher at this point in her career. She shoots 12.4 times a game while a player like Cardoso only shoots 7.5 times a game. It feels to me like those numbers should be flipped considering Cardoso’s offensive skill set. So there’s a lot of room for growth for Reese both as a player and as a person. But her numbers are what they are for better or worse and I don’t think there’s some cover conspiracy going on to help her look better than she is.
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 27,216
And1: 16,258
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#466 » by Ice Man » Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:42 pm

Angel needs Clark and vice versa. (Clark gets little use from the Fever's startng #4 because that player doesn't run the floor or make basket cuts.) That would be a win-win.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,596
And1: 9,283
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#467 » by sco » Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:36 pm

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/fridays-sky-fever-caitlin-clark-212421385.html

wow, already the most expensive WNBA ticket in history.
:clap:
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 917
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#468 » by Almost Retired » Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:01 pm

GO Fever!
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,102
And1: 1,689
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#469 » by wojoaderge » Fri Aug 30, 2024 9:25 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:i think it's a fair criticism of reese to say there have been moments where it feels like she's straining to get her numbers, and moments where it feels like she's loafing because she knows it doesn't show up in the box score. but those moments aren't particularly commonplace, and she's got such a high motor most of the time that it's hard to be too harsh on her for occasionally letting up or making a selfish play. and then when people act like there's a team-wide conspiracy to try to make angel look good...it's detached from reality, yeah

i think people are struggling to understand the context that reese is playing in — namely, that there are next to no offensive creators on the sky, and for all those possessions you see her clumsily drive to the hoop to force a bricked layup, there are just as many plays when she's not involved or on the bench and the ball just stagnates. if the team is leaning too heavily on reese for any reason, it's because they can't rely on anyone else other than chennedy to put pressure on a defense. i think kamilla has a ton of potential, but she's still really passive and doesn't look totally comfortable operating with the ball in her hands (plus barely anyone on the team is capable of making an entry pass). basically everyone else just flat-out stinks.

the team is running out the clock until they can restore the roster with capable players, so you won't really be able to judge how angel actually plays as a member of a functioning team until next year at the earliest


To add to this, I do feel like Angel could pass out of her ORBs more rather than going up against 2 defenders, knowing that she’s not a strong finisher at this point in her career. She shoots 12.4 times a game while a player like Cardoso only shoots 7.5 times a game. It feels to me like those numbers should be flipped considering Cardoso’s offensive skill set. So there’s a lot of room for growth for Reese both as a player and as a person. But her numbers are what they are for better or worse and I don’t think there’s some cover conspiracy going on to help her look better than she is.

Kamilla very often passes out of the low post when she has single coverage, and she has a mismatch against every center not named Britney Griner. As far I'm concerned the FGA disparity is pretty much on her.
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
_txchilibowl_
Veteran
Posts: 2,527
And1: 2,726
Joined: Aug 17, 2017
     

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#470 » by _txchilibowl_ » Fri Aug 30, 2024 9:45 pm

wojoaderge wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:i think it's a fair criticism of reese to say there have been moments where it feels like she's straining to get her numbers, and moments where it feels like she's loafing because she knows it doesn't show up in the box score. but those moments aren't particularly commonplace, and she's got such a high motor most of the time that it's hard to be too harsh on her for occasionally letting up or making a selfish play. and then when people act like there's a team-wide conspiracy to try to make angel look good...it's detached from reality, yeah

i think people are struggling to understand the context that reese is playing in — namely, that there are next to no offensive creators on the sky, and for all those possessions you see her clumsily drive to the hoop to force a bricked layup, there are just as many plays when she's not involved or on the bench and the ball just stagnates. if the team is leaning too heavily on reese for any reason, it's because they can't rely on anyone else other than chennedy to put pressure on a defense. i think kamilla has a ton of potential, but she's still really passive and doesn't look totally comfortable operating with the ball in her hands (plus barely anyone on the team is capable of making an entry pass). basically everyone else just flat-out stinks.

the team is running out the clock until they can restore the roster with capable players, so you won't really be able to judge how angel actually plays as a member of a functioning team until next year at the earliest


To add to this, I do feel like Angel could pass out of her ORBs more rather than going up against 2 defenders, knowing that she’s not a strong finisher at this point in her career. She shoots 12.4 times a game while a player like Cardoso only shoots 7.5 times a game. It feels to me like those numbers should be flipped considering Cardoso’s offensive skill set. So there’s a lot of room for growth for Reese both as a player and as a person. But her numbers are what they are for better or worse and I don’t think there’s some cover conspiracy going on to help her look better than she is.

Kamilla very often passes out of the low post when she has single coverage, and she has a mismatch against every center not named Britney Griner. As far I'm concerned the FGA disparity is pretty much on her.



I've noticed this as well. Though, to her credit, she's been much more aggressive post All-Star break. Especially on the defensive end. She looks like she's settling in.
User avatar
wojoaderge
Analyst
Posts: 3,102
And1: 1,689
Joined: Jul 27, 2015

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#471 » by wojoaderge » Fri Aug 30, 2024 9:58 pm

_txchilibowl_ wrote:
wojoaderge wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:
To add to this, I do feel like Angel could pass out of her ORBs more rather than going up against 2 defenders, knowing that she’s not a strong finisher at this point in her career. She shoots 12.4 times a game while a player like Cardoso only shoots 7.5 times a game. It feels to me like those numbers should be flipped considering Cardoso’s offensive skill set. So there’s a lot of room for growth for Reese both as a player and as a person. But her numbers are what they are for better or worse and I don’t think there’s some cover conspiracy going on to help her look better than she is.

Kamilla very often passes out of the low post when she has single coverage, and she has a mismatch against every center not named Britney Griner. As far I'm concerned the FGA disparity is pretty much on her.



I've noticed this as well. Though, to her credit, she's been much more aggressive post All-Star break. Especially on the defensive end. She looks like she's settling in.

Yeah, she starting to shoot a sort of drop step banker successfully. Now she just has to find a move over her other shoulder she feels comfortable with. I hope she shoots whole a lot tonight, because I don't they'll have any chance at all if she doesn't.
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,338
And1: 10,486
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#472 » by nomorezorro » Fri Aug 30, 2024 10:20 pm

it would probably be an uphill battle anyway considering the directions the fever and sky are trending in, but chennedy being out basically kills any excitement i had for this game
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#473 » by Shill » Sat Aug 31, 2024 2:44 am

Sky were badly overmatched without Carter.

ROY debate is officially over.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,480
And1: 11,262
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#474 » by MrSparkle » Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:34 pm

Welp- back to getting our asses kicked by Indiana for the next 5-10 years.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,704
And1: 917
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#475 » by Almost Retired » Sat Aug 31, 2024 1:17 pm

Shill wrote:Sky were badly overmatched without Carter.

ROY debate is officially over.


Clark isn't just ROY, she should be runner up to A'ja Wilson for MVP as well. She's the Steph Curry of women's basketball from "3", and probably the best passer in women's basketball. She completely elevated the Fever once the other players got accustomed to her creative passing. Half of the turnovers credited to her early in the season were due to teammates not being ready for her passes. She has elevated her teammates.
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#476 » by Shill » Sat Aug 31, 2024 6:12 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
Shill wrote:Sky were badly overmatched without Carter.

ROY debate is officially over.


Clark isn't just ROY, she should be runner up to A'ja Wilson for MVP as well. She's the Steph Curry of women's basketball from "3", and probably the best passer in women's basketball. She completely elevated the Fever once the other players got accustomed to her creative passing. Half of the turnovers credited to her early in the season were due to teammates not being ready for her passes. She has elevated her teammates.




I’d probably put Napheesa Collier second, but Clark has certainly put herself in the conversation.

Fever are 15-8 since that brutal 1-8 start to the season when they were playing a murderers’ row every night.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,487
And1: 9,388
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#477 » by Jcool0 » Sat Aug 31, 2024 6:20 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
Shill wrote:Sky were badly overmatched without Carter.

ROY debate is officially over.


Clark isn't just ROY, she should be runner up to A'ja Wilson for MVP as well. She's the Steph Curry of women's basketball from "3", and probably the best passer in women's basketball. She completely elevated the Fever once the other players got accustomed to her creative passing. Half of the turnovers credited to her early in the season were due to teammates not being ready for her passes. She has elevated her teammates.


Still has TO issues they are 8-4 in the last 12 games and she hasd 6+ turnovers in 7 of those games.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,487
And1: 9,388
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#478 » by Jcool0 » Sat Aug 31, 2024 6:23 pm

Sky might of dropped the ball passing on her
Read on Twitter
User avatar
Shill
RealGM
Posts: 20,956
And1: 5,977
Joined: Nov 14, 2006
Location: Rebuild Loop
 

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#479 » by Shill » Sat Aug 31, 2024 6:33 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:
Shill wrote:Sky were badly overmatched without Carter.

ROY debate is officially over.


Clark isn't just ROY, she should be runner up to A'ja Wilson for MVP as well. She's the Steph Curry of women's basketball from "3", and probably the best passer in women's basketball. She completely elevated the Fever once the other players got accustomed to her creative passing. Half of the turnovers credited to her early in the season were due to teammates not being ready for her passes. She has elevated her teammates.


Still has TO issues they are 8-4 in the last 12 games and she hasd 6+ turnovers in 7 of those games.



She still has some sloppy turnovers, but it almost doesn’t matter because her usage rate is so high and she’s generating so much offense.

Fever are #1 in offensive rating since like mid-June.
Scottie Pippen's response to whom he would pick for his running mate, Michael or LeBron: "That's a dumbass question. I've never done anything with LeBron. I wouldn't take LeBron to the movies."
User avatar
dougthonus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,057
And1: 19,131
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Chicago Sky/WNBA thread 2024 

Post#480 » by dougthonus » Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:02 pm

Jcool0 wrote:Sky might of dropped the ball passing on her
Read on Twitter


Was hoping the Sky would take her and Reese.

Return to Chicago Bulls