dhsilv2 wrote:LaLover11 wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:
and? Putting Curry with a team of two really old stars with absolutely NOTHING else on the team isn't a contender.
Lol ok so just let Curry play 40 minutes plus and wear him out and potentially bring back his ankle injures because the ownership is cheap and doesn't want to bring back in real talent in his last few yrs.
I hope curry realizes that they did Klay dirty, if they would've kept Klay... Yeah retire a lifelong warrior but nah
Why give loyalty to a team that played it safe and saved money getting rid of Klay.
They could've easily gave him a bigger contract and had the fan base happy, the players happy & that legacy saved of the big 3.
Green is next in the chopping block, remember this post.
Once Draymond is gone before the season or halfway thru.
Curry will ask for a trade request and he deserves it
Klay made the team worse...they're better without him. Obviously the warriors aren't in a great place to contend.
Oh so screw loyalty lmao
Warriors are trash with or without Klay
Glad LeBron showed the players it's all a Business & teams will just throw you away because they think you suck