DreamTeam09 wrote:Dalek wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:
Cade / Thompson / Fonteccino / Tobias / Duren
That works position wise, maybe not enough shooting & creativity
Ivey / Beasley / THJ / Holland / Stewart
I guess the shooting comes off the bench
Paul Reed
Sasser
Bobi Klintman (who I like)
They got guys they can move around,
I like Charlotte too, new coach & yeah hopefully they're healthy
Detroit getting JB Bickerstaff was a smart move. Look at how he turned around Cleveland which was a young team with an odd configuration (two PGs in and two Cs). He made them an elite defense despite it not quite being a normal line-up. Detroit has good talent all around and we just have to see what a healthy Cade looks like. I still think he has the best player potential in that class, although Mobley if he figures out how to shoot will be tough.
I'd personally take Barnes over both for a multitude of reasons, but to each their own
I can see the argument for all 3 tbh:
- Scottie: Most success and best development curve to date
- Mobley: Highest floor of the 3 as an All-NBA defender and perennial DPOY contender
- Cade: Most untapped potential as a number 1 option
If you're buying Cade, you're betting on potential and buying the highest ceiling. If you're buying Mobley, you are betting on the safest of the 3. If you are buying Scottie, you're buying a higher ceiling vs Mobley and a higher floor vs Cade.
If I had to pick today, I think I'm choosing between Scottie and Mobley though I'm less high on Cade's ceiling than most I think.
