MrDollarBills wrote:Kampuchea wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Prioritizing Daniel jones over Barkley looking like how the Sixers paid Tobias Harris over Jimmy butler
Both of them should have been gone, keeping Barkley on this trash team would have been another mistake.
Yeah exactly. No sense in compounding issues. Jones is next on the chopping block.
If you wanted to tank then yeah both of them shouldve been gone together. But it doesn't change the fact that priortizing paying Daniel Jones before Barkley looks really bad. No need to defend the front office and Daniel Jones. Paying Daniel Jones all that money when he's proven to be really bad over paying Barkley who's much more proven just looks terrible.
