AleksandarN wrote:Yeah whenever a big accumulates accolades or is a threat to his legacy he gets weird and defensive. Look at how he treated Jokic when he won his third MVP.
I would agree with this, but then how does that explain JaVale McGee?
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

AleksandarN wrote:Yeah whenever a big accumulates accolades or is a threat to his legacy he gets weird and defensive. Look at how he treated Jokic when he won his third MVP.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
dc wrote:Nate505 wrote:Shaq is an insecure moron. What's new.
Shaq's been kind of a professional hater since the end of his playing career and then afterwards as an "analyst". Remember the beef he had with guys like Perkins and Dampier circa 2010, LOL.
He likes clowning on other players, especially bigmen. And let's not forget that clowning players is the entire basis of Shaqtin a Fool, which everyone seems to love.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
MrBigShot wrote:Shaq always needs someone to bully. If it's not Dwight he'll find another big to bully, this time it's gobert.

zimpy27 wrote:Rudy hate is led by jealousy by Green who wants the DPoYs and cash that Gobert got. I'm sure Green has been in Shaq ear
Hon-essim wrote:LOL @John Starks, Charles Oakley, Harper and Davis = average team but Smush, Kwame and Luke = not.
Mr Peanut wrote:There's probably several reasons why Gobert is hated on, but I think a significant one would have to be that it is generally felt he was not deserving of his contract.
Wallace_Wallace wrote:I don't think he's a bad defender. But unfortunately, there were too many lowlight tapes of Gobert getting crossed by Curry/Harden, Clippers mounting that comeback with him getting blown by numerous times and this past season with Jokic/Doncic having iconic moments with him in the picture. A bulk of it are not his fault, but lowlights stick out so much more than the highlights. There's not a lot of "highlight tapes" of Gobert in general, maybe due to lack of fanbase?
Take my favorite player, Ben Wallace, for example. You search him on YouTube, you would probably see highlights with ferocious blocks to the 3rd row, pinning Shaq's dunk, etc. Most would only remember that. To be honest, I'm getting old, these were some of my favorite moments and I have this nostalgic feeling as I'm typing this. I also remember Yao Ming jammed it on him in the post.....but who cares, he was a post defender to pour his heart out every game.
Also, there is probably a decent amount of people who would say someone like Jamal Crawford is better Derrick White (for example) strictly due to highlights.
og15 wrote:Okay, he's saying "show me $250M", but first of all, Rudy is not lacking in effort is he? Second, Rudy didn't force anyone to give him the contract, the team gave it to him. Third, Shaq maybe is saying part of the show me $250M is that Rudy should have developed more on offense, etc, but at this level does Gobert have the natural skill to be more? His touch is weak, not sure what is going to magically improve that, he's a lot of legs, so he's not strong enough to move people around. He was the 27th pick initially for a reason, but he did a lot to make himself a very valuable player. He's been a consistent around 65% +/-2-3% FT shooter since his 4th season, something Shaq didn't even accomplish.
Then the comment about people with "real jobs", okay, but economies can't sustain them making anything close to that kind of money, but secondly, Shaq himself also made tons of money (salary, sponsorship, etc) through this not real job, and how does he know Rudy won't also be walking funny and having all these issues when it's all said and done?
This just seems like Shaq is mad that he was born into the wrong era and a guy like Rudy will have more career salary earnings than him, but who is making that comparison for him to just be calling the guy out like that? Very rude.
SomeBunghole wrote:whatisacenter wrote:Dude, what's with the cassette tape? It's like you haven't cleaned that tabletop off since the 90's!
Just digitizing old tapes lately.
dhsilv2 wrote:Wallace_Wallace wrote:I don't think he's a bad defender. But unfortunately, there were too many lowlight tapes of Gobert getting crossed by Curry/Harden, Clippers mounting that comeback with him getting blown by numerous times and this past season with Jokic/Doncic having iconic moments with him in the picture. A bulk of it are not his fault, but lowlights stick out so much more than the highlights. There's not a lot of "highlight tapes" of Gobert in general, maybe due to lack of fanbase?
Take my favorite player, Ben Wallace, for example. You search him on YouTube, you would probably see highlights with ferocious blocks to the 3rd row, pinning Shaq's dunk, etc. Most would only remember that. To be honest, I'm getting old, these were some of my favorite moments and I have this nostalgic feeling as I'm typing this. I also remember Yao Ming jammed it on him in the post.....but who cares, he was a post defender to pour his heart out every game.
Also, there is probably a decent amount of people who would say someone like Jamal Crawford is better Derrick White (for example) strictly due to highlights.
Great defense isn't a block where you send the ball back 3 rows. It's that subtle play where you stay on your feet and challenge a shot. Or you stop a drive by and they kick it back out. That's really hard to explain to even some NBA players. Let alone casual fans.
PushDaRock wrote:The Gobert slander is a bit much. He's made the playoffs 8 out of 11 seasons. His on court per 100 and on/off per 100 for his career are +6.8 and +7.2 respectively, so his teams have consistently won the minutes he's been on the court and are significantly better with him on the court than off it. He's not putting up empty numbers and he's impacting winning. He probably needs to win a chip before the narrative changes around him.
oversteerdawg wrote:Shaq didn't start crapping on Gobert randomly. Spice Williams told Shaq on a podcast that Gobert would hold him to 12 points, Shaq responded, "Yeah, 12 points in 3 mi it's". Gobert took it upon himself to post "I would lock his ass up" on IG
This is where this beef started. If you trash talk Shaq, he will go absolutely scorched earth and won't ver let it go.
Roscoe Sheed wrote:PushDaRock wrote:The Gobert slander is a bit much. He's made the playoffs 8 out of 11 seasons. His on court per 100 and on/off per 100 for his career are +6.8 and +7.2 respectively, so his teams have consistently won the minutes he's been on the court and are significantly better with him on the court than off it. He's not putting up empty numbers and he's impacting winning. He probably needs to win a chip before the narrative changes around him.
not a fan of Gobert, but you are right that he is more of a positive than a negative despite his limitations.
However, these critics are so set in their beliefs that they probably wouldn't even give him credit if they won a title- they would just give all the credit to Edwards, KAT, or Reid, etc.

dc wrote:oversteerdawg wrote:Shaq didn't start crapping on Gobert randomly. Spice Williams told Shaq on a podcast that Gobert would hold him to 12 points, Shaq responded, "Yeah, 12 points in 3 mi it's". Gobert took it upon himself to post "I would lock his ass up" on IG
This is where this beef started. If you trash talk Shaq, he will go absolutely scorched earth and won't ver let it go.
I believe this is the correct answer (as to when Shaq really started hating on Gobert).

PushDaRock wrote:The Gobert slander is a bit much. He's made the playoffs 8 out of 11 seasons. His on court per 100 and on/off per 100 for his career are +6.8 and +7.2 respectively, so his teams have consistently won the minutes he's been on the court and are significantly better with him on the court than off it. He's not putting up empty numbers and he's impacting winning. He probably needs to win a chip before the narrative changes around him.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment