ImageImageImageImageImage

Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper

User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,051
And1: 68,521
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#141 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:43 pm

Fairview4Life wrote:
C_Money wrote:
earth007 wrote:Well, time to find another team to root for. It is going to be a sh*tshow with Ed calling the shots. Masai will walk in the next couple of years as well. End of an era folks. We are back to being the craptors.


We’ve been the Craptors for the past 4 years.


The last 4 years includes a 48 win season which would have been a franchise record pre Masai, a .500 season which would have been the 5th best season in franchise history pre Masai, and two years where we tanked for half the season, something fans were clamoring for both years. The Craptors years were all significantly worse, and in fact most people's problems with management has been because the team wasn't worse for longer.


ya, people don't realize just how bad it was pre Masai.

They sucked for most their history, but they didn't suck enough to get top picks (other than for the Bargnani year which took a lot of lottery luck), and they were generally unwatchable other than for a couple VC years. The best part of most seasons were the meme's posted on this board.

That's not to say Masai has been great lately or that he shouldn't be replaced, but a mediocre Masai is 5x better than what we had prior.
User avatar
Tacoma
Head Coach
Posts: 6,432
And1: 5,521
Joined: Dec 08, 2004

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#142 » by Tacoma » Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:46 pm

Reeko wrote:
Scase wrote:
Fairview4Life wrote:
Speaking of ROI, let me just take a big sip of tea and take a quick look at how much Bell paid for their 37.5% share in 2012.

You're completely ignoring the point he is making though.

The amount of money we spend on the FO vs the success the team has had for the last 4-5 years. Bell and Rogers both made money hand over fist buying the Raptors, but that had nothing to do with Masai, anyone in the FO, or the chip. The entire NBA has had an explosion of valuations since 2013.

Spoiler:
Image


Reeko wrote:So what's the next move? Total and complete ownership of all Toronto sports teams? Larry T just sells his shares to Rogers when his time is up? This is revolting. And people saying "Oh don't worry Rogers isn't cheap they spend so much money on the Blue Jays", you know who else wasn't scared of spending money? James Dolan, and look at what he did to the Knicks for the better part of 2 decades. Maybe it won't be as bad as many of us seem to think, but the fact still remains that the guy at the top of sports pyramid in this city is a blithering idiot.


It really depends on your definition of bad I think. Plenty of people who watch the Raps were completely content with the 7-10th place teams because it was "competitive" basketball. I suspect we go back to the BC era of basketball with the team consistently floating anywhere between 35-45 wins, with no real chance at anything aside from the occasional 1st round win.

Which quite frankly, most people are seemingly fine, with if the last few years are anything to go by. It's not all doom and gloom in the sense of seeing a product put forth on the level of a grunwald/babcock, but for anyone as a fan of the team actually having a chance to win something meaningful, it's probably not gonna happen. But again, that's been par for the course as of late, so I'm not seeing much of a change.

Well the major difference would be that the previous/current group has a track record of success going back a decade and actually won a championship. Rogers hasn't had any real success and when he has had it, however fleetingly, he sabotages himself and the sports franchise by alienating the people that actually made the team successful. Best case scenario is that Masai moves on, they keep Bobby and the rest of the team in place and they don't meddle too much in the team's day to day and basketball operations.


Let's look at Raptors' record under Masai compared to Jays' record under Shapiro:

  • No. of seasons: Masai 11; Shapiro 9 (excluding 2024 which is still ongoing)
  • Reg season winning %: Masai 58%; Shapiro 52%
  • Championship: Masai 1; Shapiro 0
  • Playoffs final-4 team: Masai 2x ECF; Shapiro 2x ALCS
  • # seasons making playoffs: Masai 8; Shapiro 5

While Masai clearly has had better results, it's not doom and gloom for Shapiro either. That said, I concur with the majority that Ed Rogers as controlling owner of Raptors is not good news for reasons already noted.

Rogers reportedly holds an option to buyout Tanenbaum’s 20% minority share in 2026 which Ed will most likely exercise. Ed had reportedly preferred promoting Bobby Webster over re-signing Masai at $15M /season, which he felt was an overpayment.

$15M/yr was his base pay but he has incentives which reportedly includes % of business value increase of the team since 2021 which could be quite significant. Masai's record since 2021 has been rather subpar 141-177 (44%). If Bobby takes over (as Ed has previously preferred), he's continuity and likely won't do worse or at least not as bad as first thought.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,723
And1: 23,853
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#143 » by ATLTimekeeper » Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:50 pm

OakleyDokely wrote:
Fairview4Life wrote:
C_Money wrote:
We’ve been the Craptors for the past 4 years.


The last 4 years includes a 48 win season which would have been a franchise record pre Masai, a .500 season which would have been the 5th best season in franchise history pre Masai, and two years where we tanked for half the season, something fans were clamoring for both years. The Craptors years were all significantly worse, and in fact most people's problems with management has been because the team wasn't worse for longer.


ya, people don't realize just how bad it was pre Masai.

They sucked for most their history, but they didn't suck enough to get top picks (other than for the Bargnani year), and they were generally unwatchable other than for a couple VC years. The best part of most seasons were the meme's posted on this board.

That's not to say Masai has been great lately or that he shouldn't be replaced, but a mediocre Masai is 5x better than what we had prior.


But aside from Richard Peddie, who was not an owner but a power broker in the organization (like Larry), ownership hasn't been the reason we've sucked. Masai, Drake, DeMar and Kyle changed how the Raptors were viewed and brought the ultimate prize.

I'm not worried about the MAGA aspect, as only 5 NBA owners gave money exclusively to Democrats.

I'd be more worried about the instability that would come if Masai departed, as this is his rebuild and if there's a year of waiting to be fired/trying to force him to quit, it's more wasted time for us and then we're subject to the new guy's rebuild.
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,051
And1: 68,521
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#144 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:53 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:
Fairview4Life wrote:
The last 4 years includes a 48 win season which would have been a franchise record pre Masai, a .500 season which would have been the 5th best season in franchise history pre Masai, and two years where we tanked for half the season, something fans were clamoring for both years. The Craptors years were all significantly worse, and in fact most people's problems with management has been because the team wasn't worse for longer.


ya, people don't realize just how bad it was pre Masai.

They sucked for most their history, but they didn't suck enough to get top picks (other than for the Bargnani year), and they were generally unwatchable other than for a couple VC years. The best part of most seasons were the meme's posted on this board.

That's not to say Masai has been great lately or that he shouldn't be replaced, but a mediocre Masai is 5x better than what we had prior.


But aside from Richard Peddie, who was not an owner but a power broker in the organization (like Larry), ownership hasn't been the reason we've sucked. Masai, Drake, DeMar and Kyle changed how the Raptors were viewed and brought the ultimate prize.

I'm not worried about the MAGA aspect, as only 5 NBA owners gave money exclusively to Democrats.

I'd be more worried about the instability that would come if Masai departed, as this is his rebuild and if there's a year of waiting to be fired/trying to force him to quit, it's more wasted time for us and then we're subject to the new guy's rebuild.


My guess is Ed will keep Webster on, but he will hire a good old boy yes man as President who Bobby will have to report to until he's fired and replaced. That is, if Webster just doesn't leave as well. He's a smart guy who will have a lot of opportunities outside of basketball and without Masai/Larry T around, it might given him reason to bolt.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#145 » by Scase » Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:56 pm

Reeko wrote:
Scase wrote:
Fairview4Life wrote:
Speaking of ROI, let me just take a big sip of tea and take a quick look at how much Bell paid for their 37.5% share in 2012.

You're completely ignoring the point he is making though.

The amount of money we spend on the FO vs the success the team has had for the last 4-5 years. Bell and Rogers both made money hand over fist buying the Raptors, but that had nothing to do with Masai, anyone in the FO, or the chip. The entire NBA has had an explosion of valuations since 2013.

Image

Reeko wrote:So what's the next move? Total and complete ownership of all Toronto sports teams? Larry T just sells his shares to Rogers when his time is up? This is revolting. And people saying "Oh don't worry Rogers isn't cheap they spend so much money on the Blue Jays", you know who else wasn't scared of spending money? James Dolan, and look at what he did to the Knicks for the better part of 2 decades. Maybe it won't be as bad as many of us seem to think, but the fact still remains that the guy at the top of sports pyramid in this city is a blithering idiot.


It really depends on your definition of bad I think. Plenty of people who watch the Raps were completely content with the 7-10th place teams because it was "competitive" basketball. I suspect we go back to the BC era of basketball with the team consistently floating anywhere between 35-45 wins, with no real chance at anything aside from the occasional 1st round win.

Which quite frankly, most people are seemingly fine, with if the last few years are anything to go by. It's not all doom and gloom in the sense of seeing a product put forth on the level of a grunwald/babcock, but for anyone as a fan of the team actually having a chance to win something meaningful, it's probably not gonna happen. But again, that's been par for the course as of late, so I'm not seeing much of a change.

Well the major difference would be that the previous/current group has a track record of success going back a decade and actually won a championship. Rogers hasn't had any real success and when he has had it, however fleetingly, he sabotages himself and the sports franchise by alienating the people that actually made the team successful. Best case scenario is that Masai moves on, they keep Bobby and the rest of the team in place and they don't meddle too much in the team's day to day and basketball operations.

Yeah, that's kind of my expectation. Little Eddy over there doesn't seem to know or care much about basketball, so hopefully he just stays out of the way. It seems like his issue with Masai stemmed from his perception of "arrogance" on Masai's end, so less about knowing better, and more of the little man fragile ego thing.

Presumably you can both find a good pres/GM who also doesn't care much about stepping on toes and treats Ed like a child, patting on the head and saying "Yes totally, you're right" while just doing whatever he thinks is best for the franchise. At the end of the day, it's all about managing relationships and personalities, and probably some racism sprinkled in.

That's why I think the worst case is that we go back to the middling treadmill days, and not bottom of the league for a decade days. And like I said, we're already halfway there, so not much is going to change. My concern is what Masai does in the next 2 years that he's here, while presumably not giving a **** about the future cause he will be gone.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
Vampirate
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,673
And1: 4,497
Joined: Dec 04, 2016
     

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#146 » by Vampirate » Wed Sep 18, 2024 7:58 pm

Scase wrote:Anyone who thought Masai wasn't gone when his contract ended was being pretty delusional. It pretty much lined up perfectly with Larry's rumoured exit. Ed Roger is an absolute clown, but Masai was leaving with Larry, and Larry didn't want to stay anymore.

We got a chip and that was awesome, but the last few years have felt more like BC years than anything, so I don't see it getting much worse. The real question for me, is that with it being so obvious that Masai is gone in a year or two, how hard does he lean into this "chase the play in" re-tool.


Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.
Image
tms
Analyst
Posts: 3,152
And1: 2,431
Joined: Jun 02, 2010
   

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#147 » by tms » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:09 pm

I'm sure this bodes well
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#148 » by Scase » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:10 pm

OakleyDokely wrote:
Fairview4Life wrote:
C_Money wrote:
We’ve been the Craptors for the past 4 years.


The last 4 years includes a 48 win season which would have been a franchise record pre Masai, a .500 season which would have been the 5th best season in franchise history pre Masai, and two years where we tanked for half the season, something fans were clamoring for both years. The Craptors years were all significantly worse, and in fact most people's problems with management has been because the team wasn't worse for longer.


ya, people don't realize just how bad it was pre Masai.

They sucked for most their history, but they didn't suck enough to get top picks (other than for the Bargnani year which took a lot of lottery luck), and they were generally unwatchable other than for a couple VC years. The best part of most seasons were the meme's posted on this board.

That's not to say Masai has been great lately or that he shouldn't be replaced, but a mediocre Masai is 5x better than what we had prior.

We havent been much better post chip though. It's been a constant decline that resulted in 2 of the 5 worst post expansion era seasons in franchise history. And while I won't throw too much **** at him for the covid season, you gotta accept the whole body of work. People can say how we won 48 games post chip, but without the context of what that team actually was, and what they would have resulted in it's meaningless. Instead of tearing it down, we tried to win with a flawed core and have gotten progressively worse, and we're right back at BC/Babcock era win rates.

Ultimately I'm of the mindset that it can't get much worse than it currently is, I've seen the worst and the best of this team, so I'm prepared for the future of it.
Image
Props TZ!
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,723
And1: 23,853
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#149 » by ATLTimekeeper » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:11 pm

Vampirate wrote:
Scase wrote:Anyone who thought Masai wasn't gone when his contract ended was being pretty delusional. It pretty much lined up perfectly with Larry's rumoured exit. Ed Roger is an absolute clown, but Masai was leaving with Larry, and Larry didn't want to stay anymore.

We got a chip and that was awesome, but the last few years have felt more like BC years than anything, so I don't see it getting much worse. The real question for me, is that with it being so obvious that Masai is gone in a year or two, how hard does he lean into this "chase the play in" re-tool.


Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.


The Bulls direction was largely due to bad drafting in their rebuild phase. If you hit singles or strike out too much in the high value slot, you're going to end up with a weak treadmill team.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#150 » by Scase » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:14 pm

Vampirate wrote:
Scase wrote:Anyone who thought Masai wasn't gone when his contract ended was being pretty delusional. It pretty much lined up perfectly with Larry's rumoured exit. Ed Roger is an absolute clown, but Masai was leaving with Larry, and Larry didn't want to stay anymore.

We got a chip and that was awesome, but the last few years have felt more like BC years than anything, so I don't see it getting much worse. The real question for me, is that with it being so obvious that Masai is gone in a year or two, how hard does he lean into this "chase the play in" re-tool.


Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.

Eh could it though? IMO the worst place for a team is being stuck in the middle, not being a 20 win team, but exactly where we are now. Obviously that's subjective, but for me, this is the bottom of the barrel. At least with really low win teams you have the promise of high draft picks and getting lucky with some breakout prospect.

In the middle you have picks that rarely ever amount to anything substantial, and just sniff the playoffs while never being a real threat. One has a chance to break out, the other doesn't, it's designed to hit the bare minimum bar of "competitive" for people to keep buying.

I don't want to turn this into a tanking thread, so I'll just say, from my perspective, we're in the worst position possible currently and I can't see it getting much worse.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,051
And1: 68,521
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#151 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:19 pm

Scase wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:
Fairview4Life wrote:
The last 4 years includes a 48 win season which would have been a franchise record pre Masai, a .500 season which would have been the 5th best season in franchise history pre Masai, and two years where we tanked for half the season, something fans were clamoring for both years. The Craptors years were all significantly worse, and in fact most people's problems with management has been because the team wasn't worse for longer.


ya, people don't realize just how bad it was pre Masai.

They sucked for most their history, but they didn't suck enough to get top picks (other than for the Bargnani year which took a lot of lottery luck), and they were generally unwatchable other than for a couple VC years. The best part of most seasons were the meme's posted on this board.

That's not to say Masai has been great lately or that he shouldn't be replaced, but a mediocre Masai is 5x better than what we had prior.

We havent been much better post chip though. It's been a constant decline that resulted in 2 of the 5 worst post expansion era seasons in franchise history. And while I won't throw too much **** at him for the covid season, you gotta accept the whole body of work. People can say how we won 48 games post chip, but without the context of what that team actually was, and what they would have resulted in it's meaningless. Instead of tearing it down, we tried to win with a flawed core and have gotten progressively worse, and we're right back at BC/Babcock era win rates.

Ultimately I'm of the mindset that it can't get much worse than it currently is, I've seen the worst and the best of this team, so I'm prepared for the future of it.


It depends on who they are replaced with because there are a lot options much worse than a Masai/Webster duo.

You can be bad record wise and also take Giddey or Suggs instead of Barnes. That's how it gets worse and that's what happened a lot pre Masai.
ciueli
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,888
And1: 2,864
Joined: Apr 11, 2007

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#152 » by ciueli » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:19 pm

Vampirate wrote:
Scase wrote:Anyone who thought Masai wasn't gone when his contract ended was being pretty delusional. It pretty much lined up perfectly with Larry's rumoured exit. Ed Roger is an absolute clown, but Masai was leaving with Larry, and Larry didn't want to stay anymore.

We got a chip and that was awesome, but the last few years have felt more like BC years than anything, so I don't see it getting much worse. The real question for me, is that with it being so obvious that Masai is gone in a year or two, how hard does he lean into this "chase the play in" re-tool.


Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.


The only reason the Bulls have gone the way they have is bad luck with injuries. Lonzo's career ending injury and Zach Lavine's career altering injury are the two big ones, if those don't happen they would have been a decent team the last few seasons, certainly better than the Raptors.

I actually like what the Bulls are doing now, they are committed to rebuilding, sold off veterans, drafted Buzelis, Giddey is a reasonable pickup for an expiring player. The only veterans they haven't gotten rid of are the ones no one wants, Lavine and Vucevic, they would trade those guys if there were any takers. They'll be terrible this year anyway and likely wind up with top picks over the next few seasons while our team pushes for the play-in, at least they've picked a direction, our front office is desperately trying to scrape into the playoffs and get crushed in the first round by the championship Celitcs.
Quattro
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 9,671
Joined: Jan 29, 2016
   

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#153 » by Quattro » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:19 pm

Tacoma wrote:
Reeko wrote:
Scase wrote:You're completely ignoring the point he is making though.

The amount of money we spend on the FO vs the success the team has had for the last 4-5 years. Bell and Rogers both made money hand over fist buying the Raptors, but that had nothing to do with Masai, anyone in the FO, or the chip. The entire NBA has had an explosion of valuations since 2013.

Spoiler:
Image




It really depends on your definition of bad I think. Plenty of people who watch the Raps were completely content with the 7-10th place teams because it was "competitive" basketball. I suspect we go back to the BC era of basketball with the team consistently floating anywhere between 35-45 wins, with no real chance at anything aside from the occasional 1st round win.

Which quite frankly, most people are seemingly fine, with if the last few years are anything to go by. It's not all doom and gloom in the sense of seeing a product put forth on the level of a grunwald/babcock, but for anyone as a fan of the team actually having a chance to win something meaningful, it's probably not gonna happen. But again, that's been par for the course as of late, so I'm not seeing much of a change.

Well the major difference would be that the previous/current group has a track record of success going back a decade and actually won a championship. Rogers hasn't had any real success and when he has had it, however fleetingly, he sabotages himself and the sports franchise by alienating the people that actually made the team successful. Best case scenario is that Masai moves on, they keep Bobby and the rest of the team in place and they don't meddle too much in the team's day to day and basketball operations.


Let's look at Raptors' record under Masai compared to Jays' record under Shapiro:

  • No. of seasons: Masai 11; Shapiro 9 (excluding 2024 which is still ongoing)
  • Reg season winning %: Masai 58%; Shapiro 52%
  • Championship: Masai 1; Shapiro 0
  • Playoffs final-4 team: Masai 2x ECF; Shapiro 2x ALCS
  • # seasons making playoffs: Masai 8; Shapiro 5

While Masai clearly has had better results, it's not doom and gloom for Shapiro either. That said, I concur with the majority that Ed Rogers as controlling owner of Raptors is not good news for reasons already noted.

Rogers reportedly holds an option to buyout Tanenbaum’s 20% minority share in 2026 which Ed will most likely exercise. Ed had reportedly preferred promoting Bobby Webster over re-signing Masai at $15M /season, which he felt was an overpayment.

$15M/yr was his base pay but he has incentives which reportedly includes % of business value increase of the team since 2021 which could be quite significant. Masai's record since 2021 has been rather subpar 141-177 (44%). If Bobby takes over (as Ed has previously preferred), he's continuity and likely won't do worse or at least not as bad as first thought.



Wait...you're giving Shatkins credit for Anthopolous's teams? I guess that's the only way you make their record more favourable to masai's
Quattro
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,069
And1: 9,671
Joined: Jan 29, 2016
   

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#154 » by Quattro » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:23 pm

Does anyone realistically think that Kawhi Leonard deal gets done with this turd in charge? Trade away out best player, a guy the fans love, a guy who sells tickets for a bet on an injured guy who might not play here? That might hurt the bottom line!
User avatar
Boardbreaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,890
And1: 7,007
Joined: Aug 04, 2002
Location: Hangin with Mr. Cooper

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#155 » by Boardbreaker » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:24 pm

ciueli wrote:
Vampirate wrote:
Scase wrote:Anyone who thought Masai wasn't gone when his contract ended was being pretty delusional. It pretty much lined up perfectly with Larry's rumoured exit. Ed Roger is an absolute clown, but Masai was leaving with Larry, and Larry didn't want to stay anymore.

We got a chip and that was awesome, but the last few years have felt more like BC years than anything, so I don't see it getting much worse. The real question for me, is that with it being so obvious that Masai is gone in a year or two, how hard does he lean into this "chase the play in" re-tool.


Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.


The only reason the Bulls have gone the way they have is bad luck with injuries. Lonzo's career ending injury and Zach Lavine's career altering injury are the two big ones, if those don't happen they would have been a decent team the last few seasons, certainly better than the Raptors.

I actually like what the Bulls are doing now, they are committed to rebuilding, sold off veterans, drafted Buzelis, Giddey is a reasonable pickup for an expiring player. The only veterans they haven't gotten rid of are the ones no one wants, Lavine and Vucevic, they would trade those guys if there were any takers. They'll be terrible this year anyway and likely wind up with top picks over the next few seasons while our team pushes for the play-in, at least they've picked a direction, our front office is desperately trying to scrape into the playoffs and get crushed in the first round by the championship Celitcs.

Lonzo and Lavine have a pretty lengthy injury history but sure chalk it up to bad luck.
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,051
And1: 68,521
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#156 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:27 pm

Jerry Lucas wrote:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter



He has the charisma of a traffic cone.
User avatar
Vampirate
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,673
And1: 4,497
Joined: Dec 04, 2016
     

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#157 » by Vampirate » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:32 pm

Scase wrote:
Vampirate wrote:
Scase wrote:Anyone who thought Masai wasn't gone when his contract ended was being pretty delusional. It pretty much lined up perfectly with Larry's rumoured exit. Ed Roger is an absolute clown, but Masai was leaving with Larry, and Larry didn't want to stay anymore.

We got a chip and that was awesome, but the last few years have felt more like BC years than anything, so I don't see it getting much worse. The real question for me, is that with it being so obvious that Masai is gone in a year or two, how hard does he lean into this "chase the play in" re-tool.


Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.

Eh could it though? IMO the worst place for a team is being stuck in the middle, not being a 20 win team, but exactly where we are now. Obviously that's subjective, but for me, this is the bottom of the barrel. At least with really low win teams you have the promise of high draft picks and getting lucky with some breakout prospect.

In the middle you have picks that rarely ever amount to anything substantial, and just sniff the playoffs while never being a real threat. One has a chance to break out, the other doesn't, it's designed to hit the bare minimum bar of "competitive" for people to keep buying.

I don't want to turn this into a tanking thread, so I'll just say, from my perspective, we're in the worst position possible currently and I can't see it getting much worse.


I'm going to remind you that Masai drafted Barnes. Masai has a lot to blame for the last couple of years, but it's one thing to have a middling franchise, it's quite another to have a middling franchise with actual no young blue chip prospect to potentially build around.

We could be stuck in the same situation but have Suggs instead of Barnes (and Suggs is a great role player, but not a building block).

That Barnes pick is why I still hold Masai in high regard, despite the last few years, he went away from the hype of Suggs.

Now you say we are like the Bulls well who exactly who are the Bulls building around? Josh Giddey? Coby White?
Image
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,844
And1: 26,051
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#158 » by ItsDanger » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:33 pm

ForeverTFC wrote:
ItsDanger wrote:Masai also got a % of franchise market value appreciation (amount is unknown). Something that any board would hesitate on.


Show me a Sr. Executive of a multi-billion dollar company without RSUs/options vesting and I'll show you a fool.

Stop opining on things you have no clue about.

Most sports execs don't get that in their compensation. It was a nice reward for the championship.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,051
And1: 68,521
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#159 » by OakleyDokely » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:36 pm

ForeverTFC wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:
Kreamy wrote:Masai will probably end up in Seattle or Vegas when the NBA expands in 2026.


That's a good bet, especially if Lieweke is involved with one of the projects


I think he’ll go with Larry and his son and buy themselves a bigger soccer team.


They got one.

They purchased Saint-Étienne, a top division club in France this past spring.

https://www.kilmergroup.com/kilmer-sports-ventures-acquires-french-professional-football-club-as-saint-etienne/
ciueli
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,888
And1: 2,864
Joined: Apr 11, 2007

Re: Breaking: Rogers Aquires Bell Stake In MLSE 

Post#160 » by ciueli » Wed Sep 18, 2024 8:39 pm

Boardbreaker wrote:
ciueli wrote:
Vampirate wrote:
Keep in mind it's quite possible we could be going into the Bulls direction as a franchise as an MO.

It's been very disappointing the last few years, but it could get much worse.


The only reason the Bulls have gone the way they have is bad luck with injuries. Lonzo's career ending injury and Zach Lavine's career altering injury are the two big ones, if those don't happen they would have been a decent team the last few seasons, certainly better than the Raptors.

I actually like what the Bulls are doing now, they are committed to rebuilding, sold off veterans, drafted Buzelis, Giddey is a reasonable pickup for an expiring player. The only veterans they haven't gotten rid of are the ones no one wants, Lavine and Vucevic, they would trade those guys if there were any takers. They'll be terrible this year anyway and likely wind up with top picks over the next few seasons while our team pushes for the play-in, at least they've picked a direction, our front office is desperately trying to scrape into the playoffs and get crushed in the first round by the championship Celitcs.

Lonzo and Lavine have a pretty lengthy injury history but sure chalk it up to bad luck.


Lonzo Ball didn't have a history of injury when the Bulls traded for him, he was actually coming off the best season of his career to that point, his contract was very reasonable given his production, the career ending injury was impossible to predict.

Zach Lavine you can argue did have an injury history, but realistically most teams aren't going to bail on a 25 year old All-Star coming off a 27/5/5 42% 3pt season, that player gets a max contract extension every time. The whole idea that they are where they are because their front office is so much worse than ours is just not true.

Return to Toronto Raptors